Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

RAK Real Estate projects

REMOTE · WWW.RAK.REALESTATE

Off-plan projects in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE: search by area, developer, budget and handover year.

+3 this week 76 Trust /100

Last scanned (12 hours ago)

Scores higher than 66% of remote servers

Unreachable for 1 day in a row. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.43 → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 22 Oct 26 70

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.rak.realestate/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=rak.realestate CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 11 Oct 2026 9 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6af77f189751de5ab1034b2490979f3cb0e
SANs: *.rak.realestate, rak.realestate
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.rak.realestate. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
realestate. present 60815 8 Verified
rak.realestate. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Inconclusive

We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.

Result Inconclusive

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.rak.realestate/mcp Unreachable
http (plaintext) http://www.rak.realestate/mcp HTTPS enforced
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~770 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
compare_projects ~71

Compare 2-4 projects side by side. Accepts slugs or project names; anything that cannot be resolved is reported in not_found.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer. Default en.
slugsarrayyesArray of project slugs or names (2-4 entries)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_project_details ~113

Fetch every stored fact for one project: developer, area, starting price, handover, ownership, DLD fee, payment plan, unit mix, amenities, distances, FAQ and description. Accepts a slug or a project name.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer. Default en.
namestring–Project name e.g. "Radisson Blu by RAK". Used when the slug is unknown.
slugstring–Project slug e.g. "costa-mare"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_areas ~75

List the Ras Al Khaimah area guides published on this site, with the guide URL, its on-page summary and how many catalogue projects sit in each area.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer. Default en.
querystring–Optional area name filter, e.g. "Marjan"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_developers ~107

List the developers that have a profile page on this site, with the page URL and how many catalogue projects each one has. Use it for "which developers build in RAK" or to look a developer up before filtering projects.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer. Default en.
limitinteger–Max results, default 40, hard cap 100
querystring–Optional developer name filter, e.g. "Aldar"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_projects ~256

List off-plan projects from the site catalogue. Filter by area, developer, budget, handover year or free text. Returns name, developer, area, starting price, handover, unit types and the page URL. Sold-out projects are excluded unless include_sold_out is true.

NameTypeReqDescription
areastring–Area name e.g. "Al Marjan Island", "Mina Al Arab", "RAK Central"
developerstring–Developer name e.g. "RAK Properties", "BNW Developments"
handover_yearinteger–Year of handover, e.g. 2027
include_sold_outboolean–Include projects flagged sold out. Default false.
langstring–Language of the answer. Default en.
limitinteger–Max results, default 5, hard cap 25. ALWAYS request 5 unless visitor explicitly asks for more.
max_price_aedinteger–Maximum starting price in AED
min_price_aedinteger–Minimum starting price in AED
querystring–Free text matched against project, developer and area names (e.g. "beachfront", "branded residence")

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_site ~148

Free-text search across the whole site: projects, developer pages, area guides, informational guide pages and blog articles. Use this for any question the project tools do not answer directly (buying process, freehold ownership, visas, mortgages, fees, market news) and cite the pages it returns.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the answer. Default en.
limitinteger–Max results per group, default 5, hard cap 20
querystringyesSearch text, e.g. "buying process for foreigners", "freehold ownership", "Wynn casino"
typesarray–Optional subset of result groups. Default: all five.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the RAK Real Estate projects MCP server?

RAK Real Estate projects is a hosted endpoint at https://www.rak.realestate/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.rak.realestate

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http realestate-rak-catalog 'https://www.rak.realestate/mcp'
Common questions

What is the RAK Real Estate projects MCP server?

RAK Real Estate projects is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as realestate.rak/catalog. Off-plan projects in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE: search by area, developer, budget and handover year. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.rak.realestate/mcp).

Is the RAK Real Estate projects MCP server safe to use?

RAK Real Estate projects scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the RAK Real Estate projects MCP server expose?

RAK Real Estate projects exposes 6 tools: list_projects, get_project_details, compare_projects, list_developers, list_areas, search_site. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 770 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the RAK Real Estate projects MCP server require authentication?

Its publisher declares no required credentials for RAK Real Estate projects. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.

Is the RAK Real Estate projects MCP server still maintained?

RAK Real Estate projects is still listed in the MCP registry, though our most recent checks did not reach this channel. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.