Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations)

REMOTE · JP-INVOICE-REGISTRY-PRODUCTION.MK-CAREER-PLANNING.WORKERS.DEV

Japan NTA qualified invoice issuer status of corporations by T-number. Records daily changes.

+3 this week 73 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 60% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 498 tokens (~124/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management43
  • Stability observed for 13 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “get_receipt” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 23 Oct 26 67

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://jp-invoice-registry-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mk-career-planning.workers.dev CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 10 Oct 2026 8 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 62a608d12f78fd3a8d88d692f2a2cd87fd3
SANs: *.mk-career-planning.workers.dev, mk-career-planning.workers.dev
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of jp-invoice-registry-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://jp-invoice-registry-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://jp-invoice-registry-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp Inconclusive 406
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~498 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
catalog ~27

List the tools of this server with prices, data sources, licensing, daily limits and data freshness.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
daily_limitsobjectyesDaily limits of paid calls (calls, usd, timezone) or a misconfiguration notice.
fetch_status_valuesobject––
legalobjectyes–
pausedobjectyesOperator pause flags (true = paused).
paymentobjectyes–
provenancearray–Freshness receipts for every upstream source used.
serverobjectyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.
toolsarrayyesEvery tool of this server with its price.

No examples provided.

get_receipt ~83

Re-fetch the stored result of a settled paid call by its receipt_id, for when the response was lost after payment. Free. Unknown or unsettled receipt ids return RECEIPT_NOT_FOUND. Results are kept for 30 days after settlement.

NameTypeReqDescription
receipt_idstringyesThe receipt_id returned with a paid result ("rcpt_" + 64 hex characters).
NameTypeReqDescription
paymentobjectyes–
provenancearrayyesFreshness receipts for every upstream source used.
receipt_idstringyesReceipt id of the settled paid call ("rcpt_" + 64 hex). Use with get_receipt.
result–yesThe stored result, exactly as returned by the paid call.
settled_atstring|nullyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.
toolstringyesName of the paid tool that produced the result.

No examples provided.

invoice_registration_changes ~207

Which Japanese corporations were newly registered as qualified invoice issuers, had their published details changed, or had their registration cancelled or expired, in NTA's daily difference files since a date? From this service's own record of the files it read (NTA keeps them 40 business days). Each change has the file date, observed_at, the event type and the dates as published. Corporations only. Free window: last 30 days; page with next_cursor.

NameTypeReqDescription
cursorstring–next_cursor from a previous answer, to read the next page
event_typestring–Optional filter: registered, details_changed, expired, cancelled, record_deleted or past_record
limitinteger–Maximum number of changes, 1-500 (default 100)
sincestringyesISO 8601 date or date-time with time zone, e.g. 2026-10-01; changes in difference files created on or after that date
NameTypeReqDescription
answered_atstringyes–
attributionobjectyes–
changesarrayyesCorporate rows of the NTA difference files read by this service, oldest first.
coverageobjectyes–
files_observedarrayyes–
history_notestringyes–
history_windowobjectyesFree history window applied to this answer.
legal_noticestringyes–
next_cursorstring|nullyes–
nta_noticeobjectyesAlways pass on: cancellation and expiry are published facts with the dates as published, not an assessment of the business.
official_checkobjectyesRead first: as published by NTA; check the official site listed here before relying on this answer.
provenancearrayyesFreshness receipts for every upstream source used.
queryobjectyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.
tracking_sincestring|nullyesDate of the first NTA difference file this service read. Nothing before it was observed.
truncatedbooleanyes–

No examples provided.

invoice_registration_lookup ~181

Is this Japanese corporation a registered qualified invoice issuer, since when, and was it cancelled or did it expire? Give number (T1000020109142) or corporate_number (13 digits); the check digit is validated. Returns listed, expired (cancellation or expiry date passed) or unknown, with NTA's published dates, the difference file used, fetched_at and recorded changes. Corporations only. A number not seen in the recorded files is unknown, never 'not registered'.

NameTypeReqDescription
corporate_numberstring–Corporate number (houjin bangou), 13 digits, e.g. 1000020109142; looked up as T + the 13 digits
numberstring–Registration number: T followed by 13 digits, e.g. T1000020109142 (width, spaces and hyphens ignored)
NameTypeReqDescription
answered_atstringyes–
attributionobjectyes–
data_versionobjectyes–
legal_noticestringyes–
nta_noticeobjectyesAlways pass on: cancellation and expiry are published facts with the dates as published, not an assessment of the business.
official_checkobjectyesRead first: as published by NTA; check the official site listed here before relying on this answer.
provenancearrayyesFreshness receipts for every upstream source used.
queryobjectyes–
recorded_changesarrayyes–
registration–yes–
registry_statusobjectyes–
statusstringyeslisted = the latest recorded record shows a registration; expired = it shows a cancellation or expiry date that has passed; unknown = not in the changes recorded since tracking_since while the full f…
status_notestringyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.
unknown_reasonstring|nullyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) MCP server?

Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) is a hosted endpoint at https://jp-invoice-registry-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · jp-invoice-registry-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http mk-career-planning-jp-invoice-registry 'https://jp-invoice-registry-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) MCP server?

Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.mk-career-planning/jp-invoice-registry. Japan NTA qualified invoice issuer status of corporations by T-number. Records daily changes. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://jp-invoice-registry-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) MCP server safe to use?

Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) MCP server expose?

Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) exposes 4 tools: catalog, invoice_registration_lookup, invoice_registration_changes, get_receipt. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 498 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) MCP server still maintained?

Japan Qualified Invoice Issuers (Corporations) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.