Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Japan Residence Processing Times

REMOTE · JP-RESIDENCE-PROCESSING-PRODUCTION.MK-CAREER-PLANNING.WORKERS.DEV

Average processing days of Japan residence applications per status, from ISA's published PDFs.

+4 this week 72 Trust /100

Last scanned (43 minutes ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 655 tokens (~131/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management37
  • Stability observed for 11 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “get_receipt” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 25 Oct 26 67

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://jp-residence-processing-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mk-career-planning.workers.dev CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 10 Oct 2026 8 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 62a608d12f78fd3a8d88d692f2a2cd87fd3
SANs: *.mk-career-planning.workers.dev, mk-career-planning.workers.dev
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of jp-residence-processing-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://jp-residence-processing-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://jp-residence-processing-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp Inconclusive 406
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~655 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
catalog ~27

List the tools of this server with prices, data sources, licensing, daily limits and data freshness.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
daily_limitsobjectyesDaily limits of paid calls (calls, usd, timezone) or a misconfiguration notice.
fetch_status_valuesobject––
legalobjectyes–
pausedobjectyesOperator pause flags (true = paused).
paymentobjectyes–
provenancearray–Freshness receipts for every upstream source used.
serverobjectyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.
toolsarrayyesEvery tool of this server with its price.

No examples provided.

get_receipt ~83

Re-fetch the stored result of a settled paid call by its receipt_id, for when the response was lost after payment. Free. Unknown or unsettled receipt ids return RECEIPT_NOT_FOUND. Results are kept for 30 days after settlement.

NameTypeReqDescription
receipt_idstringyesThe receipt_id returned with a paid result ("rcpt_" + 64 hex characters).
NameTypeReqDescription
paymentobjectyes–
provenancearrayyesFreshness receipts for every upstream source used.
receipt_idstringyesReceipt id of the settled paid call ("rcpt_" + 64 hex). Use with get_receipt.
result–yesThe stored result, exactly as returned by the paid call.
settled_atstring|nullyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.
toolstringyesName of the paid tool that produced the result.

No examples provided.

residence_processing_history ~239

How has ISA's average processing time for this status of residence changed over time? Give status and optionally procedure and measure. Returns series per granularity (monthly from October 2024, quarterly FY2017 to FY2024 Q2, never mixed or interpolated), procedure and measure, oldest first, with periods that could not be read or are blank listed as gaps with the reason.

NameTypeReqDescription
measurestring–Optional: disposition (days to issuance or notification of permission) or review_end (days to the end of examination; extension and change, from FY2020). Omit for both
procedurestring–Optional: coe (certificate of eligibility), extension (extension of period of stay) or change (change of status of residence). Omit for all
statusstringyesStatus of residence: key (e.g. engineer-humanities-international, student, highly-skilled-professional-1a), Japanese name as in ISA's table (e.g. 留学, 高度専門職1号イ) or English name (e.g. Student). Exact m…
NameTypeReqDescription
answered_atstringyes–
attributionobjectyes–
disclaimerobjectyesRead first: averages of applications approved in the period, as published by ISA; not a forecast for any individual application.
fixed_notesarrayyesNotes that apply to every figure (approvals only, what disposition means, blank is not zero, seasonal peaks).
history_notestringyes–
latest_official_period–yesISA's latest period on the list page and whether this service could read its PDF.
legal_noticestringyes–
provenancearrayyesFreshness receipts for every upstream source used.
queryobjectyes–
residence_statusobjectyes–
seriesarrayyesOne series per granularity, procedure and measure, oldest first. Monthly and quarterly series are separate; nothing is interpolated.
sourceobjectyesWhere the answer comes from: ISA's list page and PDF, and when this service read them.
statusstringyes–
status_notestringyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.

No examples provided.

residence_processing_latest ~256

How many days did ISA take on average, in its latest published period, to process a residence application for this status of residence? Give status (key, Japanese or English name), optionally procedure. Returns figures with period, blank cells, the PDF's notes, ISA's PDF URL and retrieval time. Status: found, not_listed (blank, not zero), unknown, unreadable_latest (older readable period, labelled). Averages of approved applications, not a forecast.

NameTypeReqDescription
measurestring–Optional: disposition (days to issuance or notification of permission) or review_end (days to the end of examination; extension and change, from FY2020). Omit for both
procedurestring–Optional: coe (certificate of eligibility), extension (extension of period of stay) or change (change of status of residence). Omit for all
statusstringyesStatus of residence: key (e.g. engineer-humanities-international, student, highly-skilled-professional-1a), Japanese name as in ISA's table (e.g. 留学, 高度専門職1号イ) or English name (e.g. Student). Exact m…
NameTypeReqDescription
answer–yes–
answered_atstringyes–
attributionobjectyes–
disclaimerobjectyesRead first: averages of applications approved in the period, as published by ISA; not a forecast for any individual application.
fixed_notesarrayyesNotes that apply to every figure (approvals only, what disposition means, blank is not zero, seasonal peaks).
latest_official_period–yesISA's latest period on the list page and whether this service could read its PDF.
legal_noticestringyes–
older_readable–yesOnly with unreadable_latest: the most recent period this service could read. Older than ISA's latest.
provenancearrayyesFreshness receipts for every upstream source used.
queryobjectyes–
residence_statusobjectyes–
sourceobjectyesWhere the answer comes from: ISA's list page and PDF, and when this service read them.
statusstringyesfound = figures in the latest period read; not_listed = blank cells in that period (not zero); unknown = no readable data yet; unreadable_latest = ISA's latest PDF could not be read, older_readable h…
status_notestringyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.

No examples provided.

residence_processing_statuses ~50

Which statuses of residence and procedures do ISA's processing-time tables cover, and which keys and names does this service accept? Returns the canonical list (key, Japanese and English names), procedures and measures.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
answered_atstringyes–
attributionobjectyes–
disclaimerobjectyesRead first: averages of applications approved in the period, as published by ISA; not a forecast for any individual application.
fixed_notesarrayyesNotes that apply to every figure (approvals only, what disposition means, blank is not zero, seasonal peaks).
legal_noticestringyes–
matching_notestringyes–
proceduresarrayyes–
statusesarrayyes–
termsstringyesURL of the terms of service.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Japan Residence Processing Times MCP server?

Japan Residence Processing Times is a hosted endpoint at https://jp-residence-processing-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · jp-residence-processing-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http mk-career-planning-jp-residence-processing 'https://jp-residence-processing-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Japan Residence Processing Times MCP server?

Japan Residence Processing Times is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.mk-career-planning/jp-residence-processing. Average processing days of Japan residence applications per status, from ISA's published PDFs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://jp-residence-processing-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the Japan Residence Processing Times MCP server safe to use?

Japan Residence Processing Times scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Japan Residence Processing Times MCP server expose?

Japan Residence Processing Times exposes 5 tools: catalog, residence_processing_latest, residence_processing_history, residence_processing_statuses, get_receipt. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 655 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Japan Residence Processing Times MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Japan Residence Processing Times without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Japan Residence Processing Times MCP server still maintained?

Japan Residence Processing Times is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.