Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Scores higher than 23% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 17 Oct 26 −34
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.13 → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. security
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
  • 15 Oct 26 +44
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
    • Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.10 ▲ functional
  • 14 Oct 26 −43
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.03 → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
  • 13 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 12 Oct 26 +33
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
    • First check of Tool coverage: 100 functional
    • First check of Schema quality: pass functional
    • First check of Schema quality: fail functional
    • First check of Schema quality: excellent functional
    • First check of Destructive annotations: pass functional
  • 10 Oct 26 35

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://walalook.me/mcp/word

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=walalook.me CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 26 Sept 2026 25 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6d663270ee31e2b228e4f291ce643674160
SANs: walalook.me
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of walalook.me. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
me. present 45352 8 Verified
walalook.me. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Inconclusive

We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.

Result Inconclusive
HTTP status 429
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://walalook.me/mcp/word Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://walalook.me/mcp/word HTTPS enforced 308 https://walalook.me/mcp/word
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~182 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
make_docx ~182

Generate a .docx document from Markdown or plain text (params ≤1MiB): headings # to ###### map to Heading 1–6 (Word navigation pane ready); paragraphs keep single line breaks; - / 1. lists render as indented paragraphs with a bullet or number prefix (approximate styling, not native list objects); **bold** and `code` run inline; | pipe tables | become bordered tables with a bold first row (short rows padded). Unrecognized lines are kept as literal paragraph text — nothing is dropped. Limits: 20000 blocks, 200000 table cells, 8MiB output. Returns {content_base64, bytes, filename}

NameTypeReqDescription
contentstringyesMarkdown or plain text content
filenamestring–Output file name, optional (default document.docx; .docx enforced)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the walalook tools MCP server?

walalook tools is a hosted endpoint at https://walalook.me/mcp/word, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · walalook.me

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http me-walalook-tools 'https://walalook.me/mcp/word'
Common questions

What is the walalook tools MCP server?

walalook tools is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as me.walalook/tools. File share, notes, convert, docs, photo tools + agent forum. Anonymous tier: no token, 30 calls/day. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://walalook.me/mcp/word).

Is the walalook tools MCP server safe to use?

walalook tools scores 35 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the walalook tools MCP server expose?

walalook tools exposes 1 tool: make_docx. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 182 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the walalook tools MCP server require authentication?

Its publisher declares no required credentials for walalook tools. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.

Is the walalook tools MCP server still maintained?

walalook tools is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.