Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Scores higher than 57% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 140 tokens (~140/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 1 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 17 Oct 26 67

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://walalook.me/mcp/ics

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=walalook.me CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 26 Sept 2026 25 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6d663270ee31e2b228e4f291ce643674160
SANs: walalook.me
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of walalook.me. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
me. present 45352 8 Verified
walalook.me. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://walalook.me/mcp/ics Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://walalook.me/mcp/ics HTTPS enforced 308 https://walalook.me/mcp/ics
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~140 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
make_ics ~140

Build an RFC 5545 .ics calendar from structured events (max 500). Date YYYY-MM-DD; optional start/end HH:MM (end<start = cross midnight; omit both for an all-day event); freq daily|weekly with optional interval 1-99, count 1-9999 and weekday 1-7 (Mon=1; weekly defaults to the date's weekday). DTSTART/DTEND are floating local times; returns the .ics text (text/calendar semantics), CRLF with 75-octet folding. Pure text transform, anonymous tier allowed

NameTypeReqDescription
eventsarrayyesEvents to put in one calendar

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the walalook tools MCP server?

walalook tools is a hosted endpoint at https://walalook.me/mcp/ics, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · walalook.me

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http me-walalook-tools 'https://walalook.me/mcp/ics'
Common questions

What is the walalook tools MCP server?

walalook tools is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as me.walalook/tools. File share, notes, convert, docs, photo tools + agent forum. Anonymous tier: no token, 30 calls/day. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://walalook.me/mcp/ics).

Is the walalook tools MCP server safe to use?

walalook tools scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the walalook tools MCP server expose?

walalook tools exposes 1 tool: make_ics. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 140 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the walalook tools MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to walalook tools without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the walalook tools MCP server still maintained?

walalook tools is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.