Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Lithuanian Data Portal documentation

REMOTE · GUIDES.DATAPORTAL.GOV.LT

Search and read the Lithuanian Data Portal user guide and Data API docs, in Lithuanian and English

+2 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 84% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Code Search and Documentation

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 579 tokens (~193/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://guides.dataportal.gov.lt/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.2 with TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.dataportal.gov.lt,O=Valstybės duomenų agentūra,L=Vilnius,C=LT CN=GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US 1 Jul 2026 15 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA b51ab89d891fa0683ae39d0e0db4880
SANs: *.dataportal.gov.lt, dataportal.gov.lt
CN=GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US (CA) CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US 2 Nov 2017 2 Nov 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA d07782a133fc6f9a57296e131ffd179

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of guides.dataportal.gov.lt. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
lt. present 1765 13 Verified
gov.lt. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://guides.dataportal.gov.lt/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://guides.dataportal.gov.lt/api/mcp Served over HTTP 200
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~385 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_page ~125

Returns one documentation page as Markdown, with absolute links. Screenshots appear as images whose alt text describes them; the numbered list after a screenshot explains its numbered markers. Accepts a URL or path from search_docs or list_pages (e.g. "/lt/docs/guide/browsing-data/table"), or a slug such as "guide/browsing-data/table".

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–"lt" or "en". Overrides the language in the path; defaults to the path's language, else English.
pagestringyesPage URL, site path or slug.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_pages ~73

The documentation structure in sidebar order: every page with its title, link and one-line description, nested as on the site.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–"lt" or "en". Omit for both.
sectionstring–"guide", "api" or "mcp". Omit for all.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_docs ~187

Full-text search over the Lithuanian Data Portal documentation — the same index as the search box on the site. Searches the Lithuanian and English text of every page and returns the pages in the language asked for, with the passages that matched and their links. Write the query in the user's language.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Language of the pages to return: "lt" (Lithuanian) or "en" (English) — the language of the user's question. Omit to detect it from the query.
limitinteger–Maximum number of pages to return.
querystringyesWords to look for, e.g. "export filtered data" or "eksportuoti".
sectionstring–"guide" (user guide), "api" (Data API reference) or "mcp" (connecting AI assistants). Omit to search all.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Lithuanian Data Portal documentation MCP server?

Lithuanian Data Portal documentation is a hosted endpoint at https://guides.dataportal.gov.lt/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · guides.dataportal.gov.lt

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http lt-gov-dataportal-guides-docs 'https://guides.dataportal.gov.lt/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Lithuanian Data Portal documentation MCP server?

Lithuanian Data Portal documentation is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as lt.gov.dataportal.guides/docs. Search and read the Lithuanian Data Portal user guide and Data API docs, in Lithuanian and English. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://guides.dataportal.gov.lt/api/mcp).

Is the Lithuanian Data Portal documentation MCP server safe to use?

Lithuanian Data Portal documentation scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Lithuanian Data Portal documentation MCP server expose?

Lithuanian Data Portal documentation exposes 3 tools: search_docs, get_page, list_pages. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 385 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Lithuanian Data Portal documentation MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Lithuanian Data Portal documentation without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Lithuanian Data Portal documentation MCP server still maintained?

Lithuanian Data Portal documentation is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.