Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Packagist

NPM · @PIPEWORX/MCP-PACKAGIST · 2 COMPONENTS

Packagist MCP — PHP / Composer package registry

81 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 69% of npm servers

Category Code Search and Documentation

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to pipeworx-io/mcp-packagist). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 385 tokens (~96/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

What we tested

Checks we ran (15)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (1)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 81

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@pipeworx/mcp-packagist@0.2.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo pipeworx-io/mcp-packagist
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-packagist/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3685243670
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:31ac6a897f2a8c5839ac0c4ed284ffe092f0b8cfa1029431c9a5f13d93d1bbaad53f3587bad8d57efc349e9109c80ba67c255624f6087115202c05560

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~331 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_package ~100

Full Packagist registry record for one PHP/Composer package named in vendor/package form, e.g. symfony/console. Returns description, repository URL, maintainers, license, type, download and favers counts, and every published version with its requires, autoload, and dist details. Answers what a Composer package is, who maintains it, and what each release declares.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesPackage name in "vendor/package" form

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_versions ~75

Release history of one PHP/Composer package on the Packagist registry, given a vendor/package name such as symfony/console. Returns every published version string paired with its release timestamp, plus a total count. Answers which versions of a Composer package exist and when the latest one shipped.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesvendor/package

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

package_stats ~31

Download counts (total, monthly, daily) + dependents count.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesvendor/package

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~125

Search the Packagist PHP/Composer registry by free text with optional type (e.g. library, symfony-bundle) and tag filters. Returns package names, descriptions, download counts, and latest versions.

NameTypeReqDescription
pagenumber–1-based page
per_pagenumber–1-15 (default 15, API max)
querystringyesFree-text — package name / description
tagsstring–Comma-separated tags
typestring–composer-plugin | library | symfony-bundle | wordpress-plugin | ...

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Packagist MCP server?

Packagist runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-packagist. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @pipeworx/mcp-packagist

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add pipeworx-io-packagist -- npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-packagist
Common questions

What is the Packagist MCP server?

Packagist is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.pipeworx-io/packagist. Packagist MCP, PHP / Composer package registry. This page covers its npm package (@pipeworx/mcp-packagist).

Is the Packagist MCP server safe to use?

Packagist scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Packagist MCP server expose?

Packagist exposes 4 tools: search, get_package, list_versions, package_stats. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 331 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Packagist MCP server still maintained?

Packagist is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Packagist MCP server under?

Packagist declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Packagist MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 15 checks on Packagist, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 11 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Packagist: Stability. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.