QR Wall
REMOTE · QRWALL.LIVE
Read-only facts, pricing, use cases and demo links for QR Wall, a live event photo wall.
Available components
Last scanned (11 hours ago)
Scores higher than 81% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Entertainment and Games
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 401 tokens (~80/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
- Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://qrwall.live/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=qrwall.live | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 17 Oct 2026 | 15 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | fc61ff1f59d73e410e6360905e57e9e9 |
| SANs: qrwall.live, *.qrwall.live | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of qrwall.live. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| live. | present | 4724, 36322 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| qrwall.live. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self';script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://js.stripe.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net https://www.googleadservices.com https://www.google.com https://connect.facebook.net https://bzrcdn.openai.com https://replit.com https://us-assets.i.posthog.com;style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://cdn.jsdelivr.net;font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com;img-src 'self' data: https: blob:;media-src 'self' blob:;connect-src 'self' https://api.stripe.com https://*.replit.dev wss://*.replit.dev https://www.google-analytics.com https://region1.google-analytics.com https://ad.doubleclick.net https://stats.g.doubleclick.net https://www.googletagmanager.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net https://www.googleadservices.com https://www.google.com https://www.facebook.com https://connect.facebook.net https://bzr.openai.com https://bzrcdn.openai.com https://us.i.post |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://qrwall.live/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://qrwall.live/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://qrwall.live/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare Compare QR Wall with another product ~63
Given a competitor or alternative (e.g. 'Kululu', 'Walls.io', 'Slido', 'Glip'), return QR Wall's comparison and alternatives pages with their one-paragraph answer, plus QR Wall's honest limits.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| competitor | string | yes | Product name. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_use_case Find the QR Wall page and media for an event ~93
Describe an event (e.g. '150-guest wedding reception', 'company holiday party with remote staff', 'celebration of life') and get the matching QR Wall use-case pages, quotable descriptions, licensed screenshots/videos and a no-signup demo link.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| description | string | yes | The event or use case, in the user's words. |
| lang | string | – | Preferred page language (default en). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_facts Verified QR Wall facts ~74
Canonical, code-verified facts about QR Wall: product summary, plan capability matrix, how guests post, the screen, moderation, data and privacy, limits, where it fits and where it does NOT, and quick answers. Optionally narrow by topic.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| topic | string | – | Section to return (default all). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_pricing QR Wall plans and prices ~48
Every QR Wall plan (Free, Premium, Professional) and one-off add-on, with prices in USD, what each includes and its limits, plus the cheapest way to cover a single event.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_demos QR Wall demos and media ~47
Links a user can open to see QR Wall working with no sign-up — product video, live try-it wall, moderation demo, playable seasonal walls — plus the media kit per use case.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the QR Wall MCP server?
QR Wall is a hosted endpoint at https://qrwall.live/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · qrwall.live
claude mcp add --transport http live-qrwall-qrwall 'https://qrwall.live/mcp'
What is the QR Wall MCP server?
QR Wall is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as live.qrwall/qrwall. Read-only facts, pricing, use cases and demo links for QR Wall, a live event photo wall. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://qrwall.live/mcp).
Is the QR Wall MCP server safe to use?
QR Wall scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the QR Wall MCP server expose?
QR Wall exposes 5 tools: find_use_case, get_pricing, get_facts, compare, list_demos. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 325 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the QR Wall MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to QR Wall without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the QR Wall MCP server still maintained?
QR Wall is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.