# QR Wall (remote · qrwall.live)

Read-only facts, pricing, use cases and demo links for QR Wall, a live event photo wall.

- Trust score: 80/100 (high trust)
- Change this week: +3
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-11-05

## Components

- remote · `qrwall.live`: 80/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/live-qrwall-qrwall/qrwall.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/live-qrwall-qrwall/qrwall)

## Channel facts

- Endpoint: `https://qrwall.live/mcp`
- Transports: `streamable-http`
- Auth: `none`
- Version: `1.0.0`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-11-05.

- **Endpoint Security**: 80/100
  - The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key.
  - No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one.
  - HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path.
  - The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present.
  - DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC.
- **Transport & Reachability**: 100/100
  - Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 71/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Tool/resource definitions use about 401 tokens (~80/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 50/100
  - Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 100/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 100% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 100/100
  - Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.

## Install

### How do I install the QR Wall MCP server?

QR Wall is a hosted endpoint at https://qrwall.live/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add --transport http live-qrwall-qrwall 'https://qrwall.live/mcp'
```

### Cursor

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "live-qrwall-qrwall": {
      "url": "https://qrwall.live/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### VS Code

```json
{
  "servers": {
    "live-qrwall-qrwall": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://qrwall.live/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Codex

```toml
[mcp_servers.live-qrwall-qrwall]
url = "https://qrwall.live/mcp"
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "live-qrwall-qrwall": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://qrwall.live/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add live-qrwall-qrwall --url 'https://qrwall.live/mcp' --transport streamable-http
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  live-qrwall-qrwall:
    url: "https://qrwall.live/mcp"
```

### Netclaw

```json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "live-qrwall-qrwall": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://qrwall.live/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Vellum

```bash
assistant mcp add live-qrwall-qrwall -t streamable-http -u 'https://qrwall.live/mcp'
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "live-qrwall-qrwall": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://qrwall.live/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-11-05 (score 80, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-03 (score 79, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-01 (score 78, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-29 (score 77, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-27 (score 76, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-25 (score 75, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-23 (score 74, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-22 (score 73, 0)

- [functional improvement] Stability: unverified → 0.03

## MCP tools (5)

### `find_use_case` (~93 tokens)

Find the QR Wall page and media for an event

Describe an event (e.g. '150-guest wedding reception', 'company holiday party with remote staff', 'celebration of life') and get the matching QR Wall use-case pages, quotable descriptions, licensed screenshots/videos and a no-signup demo link.

Input parameters:

- `description` (string, required): The event or use case, in the user's words.
- `lang` (string): Preferred page language (default en).

### `get_pricing` (~48 tokens)

QR Wall plans and prices

Every QR Wall plan (Free, Premium, Professional) and one-off add-on, with prices in USD, what each includes and its limits, plus the cheapest way to cover a single event.

### `get_facts` (~74 tokens)

Verified QR Wall facts

Canonical, code-verified facts about QR Wall: product summary, plan capability matrix, how guests post, the screen, moderation, data and privacy, limits, where it fits and where it does NOT, and quick answers. Optionally narrow by topic.

Input parameters:

- `topic` (string): Section to return (default all).

### `compare` (~63 tokens)

Compare QR Wall with another product

Given a competitor or alternative (e.g. 'Kululu', 'Walls.io', 'Slido', 'Glip'), return QR Wall's comparison and alternatives pages with their one-paragraph answer, plus QR Wall's honest limits.

Input parameters:

- `competitor` (string, required): Product name.

### `list_demos` (~47 tokens)

QR Wall demos and media

Links a user can open to see QR Wall working with no sign-up — product video, live try-it wall, moderation demo, playable seasonal walls — plus the media kit per use case.

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: TLS, DNSSEC, Authorisation, Transports. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/live-qrwall-qrwall/qrwall#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-11-05: 80
- 2026-11-04: 79
- 2026-11-03: 79
- 2026-11-02: 78
- 2026-11-01: 78
- 2026-10-31: 77
- 2026-10-30: 77
- 2026-10-29: 77
- 2026-10-28: 76
- 2026-10-27: 76
- 2026-10-26: 75
- 2026-10-25: 75
- 2026-10-24: 74
- 2026-10-23: 74
- 2026-10-22: 73
- 2026-10-21: 73

## Common questions

### What is the QR Wall MCP server?

QR Wall is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as live.qrwall/qrwall. Read-only facts, pricing, use cases and demo links for QR Wall, a live event photo wall. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://qrwall.live/mcp).

### Is the QR Wall MCP server safe to use?

QR Wall scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the QR Wall MCP server expose?

QR Wall exposes 5 tools: find_use_case, get_pricing, get_facts, compare, list_demos. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 325 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### Does the QR Wall MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to QR Wall without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

### Is the QR Wall MCP server still maintained?

QR Wall is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

## Links

- Remote endpoint: https://qrwall.live/mcp
- Website: https://qrwall.live/
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/live-qrwall-qrwall/qrwall.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/live-qrwall-qrwall/qrwall.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/live-qrwall-qrwall/qrwall