WordRadar
REMOTE · WWW.WORDRADAR.DEV
Keyword intelligence via MCP: emerging search terms, SERP difficulty, site radar, Stripe rankings
Available components
Last scanned (4 hours ago)
Scores higher than 44% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 9 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 528 tokens (~58/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management37
- Stability observed for 11 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage73
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 20% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
- Schema quality: 51 → 58 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 8% → 20% ▲ functional
- New tool “meme_radar” functional
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 25 Oct 26 57
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.wordradar.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=wordradar.dev | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 19 Oct 2026 | 17 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 64b5ad237cfd5393817c3cc7b3e8d9ee3e8 |
| SANs: *.wordradar.dev, wordradar.dev | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.wordradar.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| wordradar.dev. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.wordradar.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.wordradar.dev/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://www.wordradar.dev/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
domain_timeline ~42
域名历史：RDAP 注册事件 × Wayback 分段/空窗/换主结论。2 credits
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_usage ~16
查我的 credits 余额（免费）
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ledger_pulse ~30
新词脉搏：最新账本期的首现新词数（免费端点）
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ledger_words ~98
词账本查询：按类型(新词|二次爆火|长期大词|存量)/方向(AI|游戏|工具)/站群匹配过滤。1 credit
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| direction | string | – | – |
| limit | number | – | – |
| site | string | – | 站群匹配（如 voicememotext）——该词该进你哪个站 |
| type | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
meme_radar ~117
梗雷达：梗词监控层（KYM/新闻/TikTok 官方榜/Trends/Reddit）新捕获的梗词，含首见时间、来源与 flag。带 term 查单条，不带则列近期（默认仅 flagged）。1 credit
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| flagged_only | boolean | – | 列表模式是否只看词面规则命中 |
| limit | number | – | – |
| term | string | – | 精确查单条（大小写不敏感） |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
proxy_kd_score ~57
SERP 前十构成打分（proxy-kd，0-100+判定）。喂入 [{url,domain?}]。1 credit
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | – | – |
| results | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
site_radar_latest ~55
HN 新站发现（free=免费托管子域/custom=自有域名）。1 credit
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| hosting | string | – | – |
| limit | number | – | – |
| min_points | number | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stripe_leaderboard ~36
Stripe 官方引荐月榜（跑通闭环的新玩家信号）。1 credit
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| month | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trends_rising ~37
谷歌趋势上升词（Breakout 优先，读采集缓存）。2 credits
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the WordRadar MCP server?
WordRadar is a hosted endpoint at https://www.wordradar.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.wordradar.dev
claude mcp add --transport http lian-yang-wordradar 'https://www.wordradar.dev/mcp'
What is the WordRadar MCP server?
WordRadar is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.lian-yang/wordradar. Keyword intelligence via MCP: emerging search terms, SERP difficulty, site radar, Stripe rankings. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.wordradar.dev/mcp).
Is the WordRadar MCP server safe to use?
WordRadar scores 63 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the WordRadar MCP server expose?
WordRadar exposes 9 tools: ledger_pulse, ledger_words, proxy_kd_score, site_radar_latest, trends_rising, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 488 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the WordRadar MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to WordRadar without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the WordRadar MCP server still maintained?
WordRadar is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.