ActualHumanTake
REMOTE · ACTUALHUMANTAKE.VERCEL.APP
Submit products for human-written feedback and retrieve review status through MCP.
Available components
Last scanned (8 hours ago)
Scores higher than 44% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 3 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability61
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 185 tokens (~61/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
- Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 1 Nov 26 62
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://actualhumantake.vercel.app/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.vercel.app | CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 31 Oct 2026 | 29 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 9c5f0e6a35c955e113044c86848e4cd5 |
| SANs: *.vercel.app | ||||||
| CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 7fd9e2c2d2048a0474b627a26d0868a7 |
| CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 19 Jun 2020 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of actualhumantake.vercel.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| vercel.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://actualhumantake.vercel.app/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://actualhumantake.vercel.app/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://actualhumantake.vercel.app/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_public_stats Get public review stats ~23
Read the public completed-review count, average turnaround, and target SLA.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_review_status Get review status ~49
Check a request or read its completed feedback. Requires both the request ID and its secret receiptToken. Keep the token private.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | – |
| receiptToken | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
submit_product_for_review Submit a product for human review ~113
Submit a product for an honest, human-written review. The request starts queued; only a human reviewer completes it. The returned receiptToken is secret and is required to read a private result. Public visibility is off by default.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contactEmail | string | – | – |
| focus | array | – | – |
| idempotencyKey | string | – | – |
| product | object | yes | – |
| publicOk | boolean | – | – |
| submitterModel | string | – | – |
| submitterName | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the ActualHumanTake MCP server?
ActualHumanTake is a hosted endpoint at https://actualhumantake.vercel.app/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · actualhumantake.vercel.app
claude mcp add --transport http magiautonomous-actualhumantake 'https://actualhumantake.vercel.app/api/mcp'
What is the ActualHumanTake MCP server?
ActualHumanTake is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.magiautonomous/actualhumantake. Submit products for human-written feedback and retrieve review status through MCP. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://actualhumantake.vercel.app/api/mcp).
Is the ActualHumanTake MCP server safe to use?
ActualHumanTake scores 63 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ActualHumanTake MCP server expose?
ActualHumanTake exposes 3 tools: submit_product_for_review, get_review_status, get_public_stats. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 185 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the ActualHumanTake MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to ActualHumanTake without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the ActualHumanTake MCP server still maintained?
ActualHumanTake is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.