io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind
NPM · SAFE-MIND-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20
Psychological risk assessments (GBU Psyche) via Safe Mind: surveys, departments, analytics.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 31 of 96 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 22 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 582 tokens (~48/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
- Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage70
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 9% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind MCP server?
io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y safe-mind-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · safe-mind-mcp
claude mcp add lewo-media-safe-mind -- npx -y safe-mind-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"lewo-media-safe-mind": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"safe-mind-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"lewo-media-safe-mind": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"safe-mind-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add lewo-media-safe-mind -- npx -y safe-mind-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"lewo-media-safe-mind": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"safe-mind-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add lewo-media-safe-mind --command npx --arg -y --arg safe-mind-mcp
mcp_servers:
lewo-media-safe-mind:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "safe-mind-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"lewo-media-safe-mind": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"safe-mind-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add lewo-media-safe-mind -t stdio -c npx -a -y safe-mind-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"lewo-media-safe-mind": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"safe-mind-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Sept 26 +4
- Stability: unverified → 0.27 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/safe-mind-mcp@0.1.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 96 packages
| Packages resolved | 96 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 31 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
safe_mind_create_department ~46
Create a company department/area (Tätigkeitsbereich), e.g. "Produktion (Halle 1, 2)".
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_create_location ~26
Create a company location (Standort).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_create_survey ~126
Create a survey draft for the psychological risk assessment. Departments are passed by name and created automatically if missing. Returns edit and preview links; the survey is started by the account owner in the Safe Mind app.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| analyticsMinThreshold | integer | – | Minimum group size for segmented analytics (default 7) |
| departments | array | yes | – |
| durationWeeks | integer | yes | – |
| employeeCount | integer | yes | – |
| locations | array | – | – |
| startDate | string | yes | YYYY-MM-DD, first day of the survey |
| title | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_get_analytics ~50
Aggregated survey results (overall and per category), optionally grouped. Groups below the anonymity threshold are never returned.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| groupBy | string | – | – |
| surveyId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_get_api_key ~64
Obtain an API key for a verified Safe Mind account (email + password). The key is kept in memory for this session; for permanent use set the SAFE_MIND_API_KEY environment variable.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| string | yes | – | |
| password | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_get_survey ~31
Show one survey: status, timeframe, participation link.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| surveyId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_list_departments ~29
List the company departments/areas (Tätigkeitsbereiche) used for survey segmentation.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_list_locations ~19
List the company locations (Standorte).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_list_surveys ~23
List the surveys of the company with status and dates.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_me ~19
Show the authenticated Safe Mind account and company.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_register ~112
Create a Safe Mind account with a company. Safe Mind runs the legally required psychological risk assessment (Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung, GBU Psyche) for German companies. A verification code is sent by email; verify with safe_mind_verify_email.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| companyName | string | yes | – |
| string | yes | – | |
| employeeCount | integer | yes | – |
| firstName | string | yes | – |
| lastName | string | yes | – |
| password | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
safe_mind_verify_email ~37
Verify a Safe Mind account with the code received by email.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | – |
| string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind MCP server?
io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind. Psychological risk assessments (GBU Psyche) via Safe Mind: surveys, departments, analytics. This page covers its npm package (safe-mind-mcp).
Is the io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind MCP server safe to use?
io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind MCP server expose?
io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind exposes 12 tools: safe_mind_register, safe_mind_verify_email, safe_mind_get_api_key, safe_mind_me, safe_mind_list_departments, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 582 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind MCP server still maintained?
io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind MCP server under?
io.github.lewo-media/safe-mind declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.