Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

POKT Agent tools

REMOTE · MCP.POKT-AGENT.COM

Pine Script backtest-trap checks, backtest reconciliation and official Korean finance data.

+3 this week 78 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 76% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1017 tokens (~84/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage83
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 48% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: 854 → 1017 ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 42% → 48% ▲ functional
    • Server version: 0.1.0 → 0.2.0 functional
    • New tool “pocket_catalog” functional
  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.pokt-agent.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=pokt-agent.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 19 Sept 2026 18 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 69f2f057357d34e7d43de82943877a8edd3
SANs: *.pokt-agent.com, pokt-agent.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.pokt-agent.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
pokt-agent.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.pokt-agent.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.pokt-agent.com/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~982 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
backtest_reconcile ~136

Recompute net profit, win rate, profit factor and closed-trade drawdown from a TradingView 'List of trades' CSV or a JSON trade list with commission settings, and mark each claimed metric MATCH or MISMATCH.

NameTypeReqDescription
claimedobject–metrics to check, e.g. {net_profit, win_rate, profit_factor, max_drawdown}
commissionobject–{type: percent|per_contract|cash_per_order, value}
initial_capitalnumber––
tradesarray––
trades_csvstring–TradingView Strategy Tester List of trades CSV export

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

dart_correction_impact ~95

For a Korean listed company: which cited DART filings were later corrected or withdrawn, and which numbers or dates in a report equal a corrected value (STALE), with the corrected value and filing.

NameTypeReqDescription
corpstring–company name
corp_codestring––
rcept_nosarray––
sincestring–YYYYMMDD
textstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

dart_events ~61

Korean listed-company disclosures from OpenDART: filings, corrections linked to originals with before/after values, point-in-time view. Ask in Korean or English.

NameTypeReqDescription
questionstringyes–
sincestring––
tostring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

kr_apartment_trades ~46

Korean apartment sale prices from the MOLIT real-transaction register by district and month, trends and single complexes. Ask in Korean or English.

NameTypeReqDescription
questionstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

kr_export_pulse ~46

South Korea's export statistics from Korea Customs Service: 10-day provisional totals, changes vs prior month and year, HS code and country trade.

NameTypeReqDescription
questionstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

kr_figure_check ~98

Check the numbers in a Korean finance text against official sources: percent vs percentage point, 조/억 units, Bank of Korea base rate and KTB yields, KRW exchange rates, listed-company revenue/operating profit/net income from DART (consolidated vs separate).

NameTypeReqDescription
as_ofstring–YYYY-MM-DD
corpstring––
textstringyes–
yearinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

kr_fx ~57

KRW exchange rates from the Export-Import Bank of Korea: deal basis, telegraphic buying and selling rates.

NameTypeReqDescription
ccystring–comma-separated ISO codes, e.g. USD,JPY
datestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

kr_law_article ~79

One article of a Korean statute quoted verbatim with paragraphs and items, promulgation and enforcement dates and the official link. Accepts official names, abbreviations (자본시장법) and common English names.

NameTypeReqDescription
lawstringyes–
nostringyesarticle number, e.g. 178 or 178의2

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

kr_rates ~63

Official Korean interest rates on a date: BoK base rate, call, KOFR, CD, CP, MSB, KTB 1y-50y and spreads, each with its observation date.

NameTypeReqDescription
datestring–YYYY-MM-DD, default today

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pine_integrity ~92

Check TradingView Pine Script v5/v6 for structures that make backtests look better than live trading: future data (lookahead_on without offset), unconfirmed higher-timeframe values, signals drawn on past bars, realtime-only state, fill and cost assumptions, alerts on unconfirmed bars. Returns verdict, findings with line and rule, and what was not checked.

NameTypeReqDescription
sourcestringyesPine Script source

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pine_lint ~57

Lint TradingView Pine Script: version annotation, declaration, brackets, strings, v4 remnants in v5/v6 code, undeclared reassignment, limits, plus all integrity checks.

NameTypeReqDescription
sourcestringyesPine Script source

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pocket_catalog ~152

Find any service in the Pocket Network agentic catalog (100+ pay-per-call APIs: blockchain, finance, documents, government, web, compliance, security, health, AI, research). Returns service id, name, category, price in USD per call, the x402 endpoint URL and a short description; call the endpoint directly with an x402 payment on Base. 포켓 네트워크 전체 에이전트 서비스 검색(한국어 질문 가능).

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–blockchain|finance|documents|government|web|compliance|security|health|ai|research
limitinteger–max rows, default 10
querystring–keywords, Korean or English

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the POKT Agent tools MCP server?

POKT Agent tools is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.pokt-agent.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.pokt-agent.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http jsymen1290-pokt-agent 'https://mcp.pokt-agent.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the POKT Agent tools MCP server?

POKT Agent tools is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.jsymen1290/pokt-agent. Pine Script backtest-trap checks, backtest reconciliation and official Korean finance data. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.pokt-agent.com/mcp).

Is the POKT Agent tools MCP server safe to use?

POKT Agent tools scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the POKT Agent tools MCP server expose?

POKT Agent tools exposes 12 tools: pine_integrity, pine_lint, backtest_reconcile, kr_figure_check, dart_correction_impact, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 982 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the POKT Agent tools MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to POKT Agent tools without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the POKT Agent tools MCP server still maintained?

POKT Agent tools is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.