California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury Firm
REMOTE · CASLIPANDFALL.COM · SCANNED SEP 20
Not sure what to do after a slip and fall in California? Use this free evidence checker to find out
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability55
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 908 tokens (~908/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
- Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… MCP server?
California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… is a hosted endpoint at https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · caslipandfall.com
claude mcp add --transport http janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com 'https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com": {
"url": "https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com] url = "https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com --url 'https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com:
url: "https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com -t streamable-http -u 'https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"janoliverautomation-stack-caslipandfall-com": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=caslipandfall.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 13 Sept 2026 | 12 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | e1d0531f664051d90edb723a538785b5 |
| SANs: caslipandfall.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of caslipandfall.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| caslipandfall.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_slip_fall_evidence California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker ~778
Educational decision-support tool for people injured in a slip and fall in California. Given answers describing how a fall happened, injuries, evidence already preserved, and any insurance or property-owner communications, it returns a structured, educational evidence-preservation checklist: an urgency level, the specific evidence to preserve, what to avoid, and questions worth asking an attorney. SAFEGUARDS: Informational/educational ONLY — NOT legal advice. It does NOT assess liability or fault, does NOT determine claim validity, does NOT calculate case value, does NOT estimate probability of winning, does NOT guarantee outcomes, and does NOT create an attorney-client relationship. Any response must be conveyed to the end user as educational information only.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fallType | string | – | How the fall happened, e.g. slip_wet_floor, trip_uneven, fell_stairs, fell_parking, fell_sidewalk, fell_store, fell_apartment, fell_restaurant, fell_pool, fell_elevator, other. |
| faultQuestioning | string | – | Whether fault has been questioned, e.g. yes_insurance, yes_both, no. |
| hazardDuration | string | – | How long the hazard likely existed, e.g. minutes, hours, days, weeks_months, permanent. |
| incidentReport | string | – | Whether an incident report was created, e.g. yes, no, refused. |
| injurySymptoms | array | – | List of injury symptoms, e.g. fracture, head_injury, surgery_recommended, back_injury, nerve_damage, bruising, sprain. |
| medicalCare | string | – | Medical care status, e.g. yes_treated, no_cant_afford, no_not_yet. |
| priorComplaints | string | – | Whether prior complaints about the hazard were made, e.g. yes_written, yes_verbal, others_complained, none. |
| publicPrivate | string | – | Whether the fall was on public/government property or private property. Public property falls involve shorter government-claim deadlines in California. |
| recordedStatement | string | – | Insurance recorded-statement status, e.g. yes_gave, asked_not_given, not_asked. |
| recurringProblem | string | – | Whether the hazard was a recurring problem, e.g. yes, heard, no. |
| rentalProperty | string | – | Whether the fall involved a rental/landlord property, e.g. yes_tenant, yes_visitor, no. |
| settlementOffer | string | – | Settlement offer status, e.g. yes_accepted, yes_considering, yes_declined, none. |
| signedDocuments | string | – | Whether any insurance/property documents were signed, e.g. yes, no. |
| staffAwareness | string | – | Whether staff/owner were aware of the hazard, e.g. yes_definitely, told_them, should_have, no. |
| surveillanceVideo | string | – | Whether surveillance cameras may exist, e.g. yes_cameras, maybe, no_cameras. |
| symptomProgression | string | – | How symptoms are progressing, e.g. worse, new_symptoms, same, improving. |
| timing | string | – | How long ago the incident occurred, e.g. within_24h, within_48h, within_week, within_2weeks, within_month, within_3months, within_6months, over_6months. |
| videoPreservation | string | – | Status of any request to preserve video, e.g. no_not_yet, requested, refused, preserved. |
| warningSign | string | – | Whether a warning sign was present, e.g. yes_adequate, yes_inadequate, no_sign. |
| witnesses | string | – | Witness status, e.g. yes_contact, yes_no_contact, no_witnesses. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… MCP server?
California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.janoliverautomation-stack/caslipandfall-com. Not sure what to do after a slip and fall in California? Use this free evidence checker to find out. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://caslipandfall.com/api/mcp).
Is the California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… MCP server safe to use?
California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… MCP server expose?
California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… exposes 1 tool: check_slip_fall_evidence. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 778 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… MCP server still maintained?
California Slip & Fall Evidence Checker | JSM Injury… is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.