Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm

REMOTE · CALDOGBITEEVIDENCE.COM · SCANNED SEP 20

Bitten or injured by a dog in California? Use this private checklist to understand what evidence to

+4 this week 65 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability53
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 817 tokens (~817/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm MCP server?

California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm is a hosted endpoint at https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · caldogbiteevidence.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com 'https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com": {
      "url": "https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com]
url = "https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com --url 'https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com:
    url: "https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com -t streamable-http -u 'https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "janoliverautomation-stack-caldogbiteevidence-com": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 7 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 5 Sept 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=caldogbiteevidence.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 28 Aug 2026 26 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 5151c8a815ae1b030e04adc886dc04b8
SANs: caldogbiteevidence.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of caldogbiteevidence.com. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
caldogbiteevidence.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~735 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_dog_bite_evidence ~735

California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist. Given a plain-language description of a dog bite or animal attack in California (how it happened, who was injured, when/where, dog-owner and insurance situation, injuries and medical care, and what evidence exists), returns a personalized, educational checklist: evidence to preserve now, what to avoid, plain-language questions that may be worth attorney review, and an educational urgency indicator. Educational evidence-preservation support only. This tool does NOT provide legal advice, does NOT assess liability or fault, does NOT determine whether you have a valid claim or case, does NOT estimate case value, does NOT predict the probability of winning, and does NOT guarantee compensation or any legal outcome. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. Only an attorney can evaluate the facts of your specific situation.

NameTypeReqDescription
incident_typestringType of incident, e.g. "Dog bite that broke the skin", "Dog knocked me down", "Dog attacked my child", "Dog attacked my pet and I was also injured", "Other animal attack".
injuriesarrayInjuries present, e.g. "Facial injury", "Scarring or disfigurement", "Nerve damage/numbness", "Infection concern", "Emotional trauma/fear/anxiety".
insurance_contactedstringWhether an insurance adjuster has contacted the user, e.g. "Yes", "No", "Not sure".
insurance_infostringDog-owner insurance status, e.g. "Yes", "No", "They said they have no insurance", "They are avoiding me", "They offered to pay cash", "I have not asked yet".
medical_carearrayMedical care received, e.g. "Emergency room", "Urgent care", "Primary doctor", "None yet".
property_involvedstringWhether the incident happened at a property controlled by someone other than the dog owner (landlord, apartment, business).
recorded_statementstringRecorded statement status, e.g. "Yes", "They asked but I have not done it", "No".
settlement_offeredstringSettlement offer status, e.g. "Yes", "Insurance offer", "Informal cash offer from owner", "No".
signed_anythingstringWhether the user signed or was asked to sign anything, e.g. "Yes", "I was asked to sign", "No".
video_evidencearrayPossible video/camera evidence sources, e.g. "Ring/doorbell camera", "Business security camera", "Bystander phone video", "Not sure".
when_happenedstringWhen it happened, e.g. "Today", "Yesterday", "Within the last 7 days", "Within the last 30 days", "1–6 months ago", "6–24 months ago", "More than 2 years ago", "Not sure".
where_happenedstringWhere it happened, e.g. "Neighbor's home", "Apartment complex", "Delivery route", "Public sidewalk or street".
who_injuredstringWho was injured, e.g. "Me", "My child", "Me and my child were injured", "A delivery worker / employee", "Multiple people were injured".
workingstringWhether the user was working (e.g. delivery/gig work) when injured, e.g. "Yes, delivering packages", "No", "Not sure".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm MCP server?

California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.janoliverautomation-stack/caldogbiteevidence-com. Bitten or injured by a dog in California? Use this private checklist to understand what evidence to. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://caldogbiteevidence.com/api/mcp).

Is the California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm MCP server safe to use?

California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm MCP server expose?

California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm exposes 1 tool: check_dog_bite_evidence. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 735 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm MCP server still maintained?

California Dog Bite Evidence Checklist | JSM Injury Firm is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.