io.tooloracle/cybershield
REMOTE · TOOLORACLE.IO · SCANNED SEP 23
CyberShield - 12 cybersecurity tools: NIS2 mapping, MITRE ATT&CK, vulns, threat intel.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security66
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 12 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 890 tokens (~74/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage70
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 11% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the io.tooloracle/cybershield MCP server?
io.tooloracle/cybershield is a hosted endpoint at https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · tooloracle.io
claude mcp add --transport http io-tooloracle-cybershield 'https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/'
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-tooloracle-cybershield": {
"url": "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"io-tooloracle-cybershield": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.io-tooloracle-cybershield] url = "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"io-tooloracle-cybershield": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add io-tooloracle-cybershield --url 'https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
io-tooloracle-cybershield:
url: "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/" {
"McpServers": {
"io-tooloracle-cybershield": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/"
}
}
} assistant mcp add io-tooloracle-cybershield -t streamable-http -u 'https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/'
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-tooloracle-cybershield": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 26 Aug 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 75
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 27 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Jul 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 23 Sept 2026 · Probed https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=tooloracle.io | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 13 Sept 2026 | 12 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6375d594a6b9fdf6754e5a9a3d1f38b0dbd |
| SANs: mcp.tooloracle.io, tooloracle.io, www.tooloracle.io | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of tooloracle.io. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| io. | present | 57355 | 8 | Verified |
| tooloracle.io. | present | 45856 | 8 | Verified |
| tooloracle.io. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self' data: https:; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://api.feedoracle.io https://tooloracle.io https://*.tooloracle.io https://fonts.googleapis.com wss://*.tooloracle.io; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/ | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/ | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
attack_surface_check ~76
Attack surface assessment checklist. Web apps, remote access, cloud, IoT, email. Prioritized security checks.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cloud_services | boolean | – | – |
| employee_count | integer | – | – |
| iot_devices | boolean | – | – |
| remote_access_vpn | boolean | – | – |
| web_applications | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
cve_risk_score ~110
CVE risk prioritization combining CVSS, EPSS, KEV catalog, exploit availability. Returns weighted priority score with patching SLA.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| affected_systems | integer | – | – |
| cve_id | string | – | – |
| cvss_score | number | – | – |
| epss_score | number | – | 0-1 EPSS probability |
| in_kev_catalog | boolean | – | – |
| internet_facing | boolean | – | – |
| public_exploit | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
dora_ict_risk ~100
DORA Art. 5-12 ICT risk management compliance check. 8 articles assessed with specific requirements per article.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| communication_plans | boolean | – | – |
| detection_measures | boolean | – | – |
| ict_asset_inventory | boolean | – | – |
| ict_risk_framework | boolean | – | – |
| learning_evolving | boolean | – | – |
| protection_prevention | boolean | – | – |
| response_recovery | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
incident_playbook ~47
Incident response playbook for ransomware, data breach, phishing compromise. Phase-by-phase actions with legal obligations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| incident_type | string | – | ransomware | data_breach | phishing_compromise |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
iso27001_gap ~54
ISO 27001:2022 Annex A gap analysis. All 93 controls across 4 themes, new 2022 controls highlighted, certification process.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| controls | object | – | Optional: status of specific controls |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
nis2_compliance ~160
NIS2 Directive (EU 2022/2555) compliance assessment. All 10 Art. 21 measures, entity classification, penalties, incident reporting.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_control | boolean | – | – |
| annual_turnover_meur | number | – | – |
| business_continuity | boolean | – | – |
| cryptography_policy | boolean | – | – |
| cyber_hygiene_training | boolean | – | – |
| employee_count | integer | – | – |
| incident_handling | boolean | – | – |
| incident_reporting_process | boolean | – | – |
| mfa_deployed | boolean | – | – |
| risk_management | boolean | – | – |
| sector | string | – | – |
| supply_chain_security | boolean | – | – |
| vulnerability_management | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
nis2_incident_report ~79
NIS2 incident notification template. 24h early warning, 72h notification, 1-month final report templates.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| affected_services | string | – | – |
| affected_users_estimate | integer | – | – |
| cross_border_impact | boolean | – | – |
| incident_type | string | – | – |
| severity | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
password_policy ~37
Generate password policy per NIST SP 800-63B (2024) and BSI recommendations. Modern best practices — no forced rotation.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
phishing_indicators ~85
Analyze email/URL for phishing indicators. Scores sender, urgency, attachments, URL patterns. Returns verdict and recommended actions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| asks_for_credentials | boolean | – | – |
| creates_urgency | boolean | – | – |
| has_unexpected_attachment | boolean | – | – |
| sender_email | string | – | – |
| subject | string | – | – |
| suspicious_url | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
risk_matrix ~58
Risk assessment matrix (likelihood × impact). ISO 31000/27005 methodology. Provide risks for assessment or get template.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| risks | string | – | JSON array [{name, likelihood(1-5), impact(1-5)}] |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
security_metrics ~33
Security KPI/metrics dashboard template. MTTD, MTTR, patch compliance, phishing rate. Board-ready reporting guidance.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
threat_landscape ~51
Current cyber threat landscape overview per ENISA categories. Top 8 threats with sector relevance and mitigations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| sector | string | – | energy|finance|healthcare|manufacturing|public_admin|general |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.tooloracle/cybershield MCP server?
io.tooloracle/cybershield is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.tooloracle/cybershield. CyberShield - 12 cybersecurity tools: NIS2 mapping, MITRE ATT&CK, vulns, threat intel. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/).
Is the io.tooloracle/cybershield MCP server safe to use?
io.tooloracle/cybershield scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.tooloracle/cybershield MCP server expose?
io.tooloracle/cybershield exposes 12 tools: threat_landscape, cve_risk_score, attack_surface_check, phishing_indicators, nis2_compliance, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 890 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the io.tooloracle/cybershield MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to io.tooloracle/cybershield without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the io.tooloracle/cybershield MCP server still maintained?
io.tooloracle/cybershield is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.