# io.tooloracle/cybershield (remote · tooloracle.io)

CyberShield - 12 cybersecurity tools: NIS2 mapping, MITRE ATT&CK, vulns, threat intel.

- Trust score: 63/100 (medium)
- Change this week: +6
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-08-03

## Components

- remote · `tooloracle.io`: 63/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/io-tooloracle-cybershield/cybershield-mcp.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/io-tooloracle-cybershield/cybershield-mcp)

## Channel facts

- Endpoint: `https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/`
- Transports: `streamable-http`
- Auth: `none`
- Version: `1.0.0`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-08-03.

- **Endpoint Security**: 66/100
  - The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key.
  - Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 12 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.
  - HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path.
  - The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present.
  - DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root.
- **Transport & Reachability**: 100/100
  - Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 66/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Tool/resource definitions use about 890 tokens (~74/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 27/100
  - Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 70/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 11% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Capabilities**: 40/100
  - Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28.

## Install

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add --transport http io-tooloracle-cybershield https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/
```

### Codex

```toml
[mcp_servers.io-tooloracle-cybershield]
url = "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/"
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "io-tooloracle-cybershield": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add io-tooloracle-cybershield --url https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/ --transport streamable-http
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  io-tooloracle-cybershield:
    url: "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/"
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "io-tooloracle-cybershield": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/"
    }
  }
}
```

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-08-03 (score 63, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-08-01 (score 62, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-07-31 (score 61, +3)

- [functional] We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server

### 2026-07-30 (score 58, 0)

- [functional] We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server

### 2026-07-29 (score 58, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-07-27 (score 57, +1)

- [functional] We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server

### 2026-07-26 (score 56)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (12)

### `threat_landscape` (~51 tokens)

Current cyber threat landscape overview per ENISA categories. Top 8 threats with sector relevance and mitigations.

Input parameters:

- `sector` (string): energy|finance|healthcare|manufacturing|public_admin|general

### `cve_risk_score` (~110 tokens)

CVE risk prioritization combining CVSS, EPSS, KEV catalog, exploit availability. Returns weighted priority score with patching SLA.

Input parameters:

- `affected_systems` (integer)
- `cve_id` (string)
- `cvss_score` (number)
- `epss_score` (number): 0-1 EPSS probability
- `in_kev_catalog` (boolean)
- `internet_facing` (boolean)
- `public_exploit` (boolean)

### `attack_surface_check` (~76 tokens)

Attack surface assessment checklist. Web apps, remote access, cloud, IoT, email. Prioritized security checks.

Input parameters:

- `cloud_services` (boolean)
- `employee_count` (integer)
- `iot_devices` (boolean)
- `remote_access_vpn` (boolean)
- `web_applications` (boolean)

### `phishing_indicators` (~85 tokens)

Analyze email/URL for phishing indicators. Scores sender, urgency, attachments, URL patterns. Returns verdict and recommended actions.

Input parameters:

- `asks_for_credentials` (boolean)
- `creates_urgency` (boolean)
- `has_unexpected_attachment` (boolean)
- `sender_email` (string)
- `subject` (string)
- `suspicious_url` (string)

### `nis2_compliance` (~160 tokens)

NIS2 Directive (EU 2022/2555) compliance assessment. All 10 Art. 21 measures, entity classification, penalties, incident reporting.

Input parameters:

- `access_control` (boolean)
- `annual_turnover_meur` (number)
- `business_continuity` (boolean)
- `cryptography_policy` (boolean)
- `cyber_hygiene_training` (boolean)
- `employee_count` (integer)
- `incident_handling` (boolean)
- `incident_reporting_process` (boolean)
- `mfa_deployed` (boolean)
- `risk_management` (boolean)
- `sector` (string)
- `supply_chain_security` (boolean)
- `vulnerability_management` (boolean)

### `nis2_incident_report` (~79 tokens)

NIS2 incident notification template. 24h early warning, 72h notification, 1-month final report templates.

Input parameters:

- `affected_services` (string)
- `affected_users_estimate` (integer)
- `cross_border_impact` (boolean)
- `incident_type` (string)
- `severity` (string)

### `iso27001_gap` (~54 tokens)

ISO 27001:2022 Annex A gap analysis. All 93 controls across 4 themes, new 2022 controls highlighted, certification process.

Input parameters:

- `controls` (object): Optional: status of specific controls

### `dora_ict_risk` (~100 tokens)

DORA Art. 5-12 ICT risk management compliance check. 8 articles assessed with specific requirements per article.

Input parameters:

- `communication_plans` (boolean)
- `detection_measures` (boolean)
- `ict_asset_inventory` (boolean)
- `ict_risk_framework` (boolean)
- `learning_evolving` (boolean)
- `protection_prevention` (boolean)
- `response_recovery` (boolean)

### `password_policy` (~37 tokens)

Generate password policy per NIST SP 800-63B (2024) and BSI recommendations. Modern best practices — no forced rotation.

### `incident_playbook` (~47 tokens)

Incident response playbook for ransomware, data breach, phishing compromise. Phase-by-phase actions with legal obligations.

Input parameters:

- `incident_type` (string): ransomware | data_breach | phishing_compromise

### `risk_matrix` (~58 tokens)

Risk assessment matrix (likelihood × impact). ISO 31000/27005 methodology. Provide risks for assessment or get template.

Input parameters:

- `risks` (string): JSON array [{name, likelihood(1-5), impact(1-5)}]

### `security_metrics` (~33 tokens)

Security KPI/metrics dashboard template. MTTD, MTTR, patch compliance, phishing rate. Board-ready reporting guidance.

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: TLS, DNSSEC, Authorisation, Transports. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/io-tooloracle-cybershield/cybershield-mcp#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-08-03: 63
- 2026-08-02: 62
- 2026-08-01: 62
- 2026-07-31: 61
- 2026-07-30: 58
- 2026-07-29: 58
- 2026-07-28: 57
- 2026-07-27: 57
- 2026-07-26: 56

## Links

- Remote endpoint: https://tooloracle.io/cybershield/mcp/
- Repository: https://github.com/ToolOracle/cybershield
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/io-tooloracle-cybershield/cybershield-mcp/changelog.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/io-tooloracle-cybershield/cybershield-mcp/changelog.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/io-tooloracle-cybershield/cybershield-mcp