Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization
REMOTE · MCP.STOBOX.IO · SCANNED SEP 26
Verified RWA tokenization knowledge — security tokens, regulation, standards — for any AI.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security60
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 6 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability70
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 956 tokens (~159/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage86
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 57% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "stobox_start_tokenization" implies "send" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization MCP server?
Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.stobox.io
claude mcp add --transport http io-stobox-intelligence-graph 'https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-stobox-intelligence-graph": {
"url": "https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"io-stobox-intelligence-graph": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.io-stobox-intelligence-graph] url = "https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"io-stobox-intelligence-graph": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add io-stobox-intelligence-graph --url 'https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
io-stobox-intelligence-graph:
url: "https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"io-stobox-intelligence-graph": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add io-stobox-intelligence-graph -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-stobox-intelligence-graph": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 20 Aug 26 0
- Server version: 0.1.1 → 0.1.2 functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 27 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 26 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.stobox.io | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5f409117495e49c358d4de54b36684090c2 |
| SANs: mcp.stobox.io | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of mcp.stobox.io. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| io. | present | 57355 | 8 | Verified |
| stobox.io. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| mcp.stobox.io. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.stobox.io/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
stobox_answer_context ~67
Build a source-linked briefing for answering a tokenization question: the top passages, entity facts, and source URLs in one prompt-ready block. Use it to ground an answer in verified Stobox knowledge before responding.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_chars | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stobox_fact_check ~104
Verify a claim about Stobox or tokenization against the CANONICAL Stobox knowledge graph before repeating or publishing it. Returns a verdict (contradicted / supported / no_contradiction_detected / unverifiable), any canon violations with corrections, and the canonical evidence. Call this on every factual claim about STBX, ERC-7943, Compass chains, Gene Deyev's title, etc.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| claim | string | yes | The factual claim to verify. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stobox_knowledge_search ~99
Search Stobox's verified knowledge base on real-world-asset tokenization: canonical, source-linked answers, facts, and articles (GraphRAG: vector + relationship expansion). Use for any question about tokenization, RWA, security tokens, regulation, Compass, STBX/STBU, or Stobox itself.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| k | integer | – | Max results (default 8). |
| query | string | yes | The question or search query. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stobox_related_topics ~57
Show what is connected to a term in the Stobox knowledge graph — the related products, standards, regulations, and concepts, 1–2 relationship hops out.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| hops | integer | – | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stobox_start_tokenization ~218
Send the user's request to start tokenizing their real-world asset to the Stobox team, so a specialist contacts them (shares their email with Stobox, with their consent). Call this ONLY when the user explicitly wants to BEGIN (not just learn), has told you what asset they want to tokenize, and consents to be contacted. Requires a contact email. Returns confirmation + next steps. Do NOT call for general questions — use the search/lookup tools for those. Never invent an email; ask the user for it first.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| asset_type | string | yes | What they want to tokenize, e.g. real estate, a fund, private credit, company equity. |
| company | string | – | – |
| string | yes | The user's contact email (required). | |
| jurisdiction | string | – | Country/region of the asset or issuer. |
| name | string | – | The user's name, if given. |
| notes | string | – | Anything relevant they shared: asset size, timeline, goals. No sensitive IDs or financials. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stobox_term_lookup ~67
Explain one term, product, standard, or regulation from the Stobox knowledge graph — e.g. 'STBX', 'Compass', 'ERC-7943', 'MiCA'. Returns its authoritative description, aliases, relationships, and source documents.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization MCP server?
Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.stobox/intelligence-graph. Verified RWA tokenization knowledge, security tokens, regulation, standards, for any AI. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.stobox.io/mcp).
Is the Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization MCP server safe to use?
Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization MCP server expose?
Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization exposes 6 tools: stobox_knowledge_search, stobox_term_lookup, stobox_related_topics, stobox_fact_check, stobox_answer_context, stobox_start_tokenization. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 612 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization MCP server still maintained?
Stobox Intelligence & Tokenization is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 26 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.