Real Estate Analyzer
REMOTE · REIZER.IO · SCANNED SEP 21
Free real-estate underwriting, no key or account. 6 strategies, stress tests, max offer.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 831 tokens (~207/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage95
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 83% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the Real Estate Analyzer MCP server?
Real Estate Analyzer is a hosted endpoint at https://reizer.io/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · reizer.io
claude mcp add --transport http io-reizer-deal-analysis 'https://reizer.io/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-reizer-deal-analysis": {
"url": "https://reizer.io/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"io-reizer-deal-analysis": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://reizer.io/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.io-reizer-deal-analysis] url = "https://reizer.io/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"io-reizer-deal-analysis": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://reizer.io/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add io-reizer-deal-analysis --url 'https://reizer.io/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
io-reizer-deal-analysis:
url: "https://reizer.io/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"io-reizer-deal-analysis": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://reizer.io/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add io-reizer-deal-analysis -t streamable-http -u 'https://reizer.io/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-reizer-deal-analysis": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://reizer.io/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Sept 26 +4
- Stability: fail → pass ▲ security
- 2 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 61 to 65.
- 31 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 55 to 58.
- 29 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 48 to 51.
- 27 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 41 to 45.
- 26 Aug 26 +2
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 24 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 31 to 35.
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Probed https://reizer.io/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=reizer.io | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6cb6cd2216d384f9e9297cb9b1f3f61be6c |
| SANs: reizer.io, www.reizer.io | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of reizer.io. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| io. | present | 57355 | 8 | Verified |
| reizer.io. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://reizer.io/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://reizer.io/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://reizer.io/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
analyze_deal Analyze a real-estate deal ~240
Underwrite a real-estate investment deal and get a 0-100 score, verdict, cash flow, cap rate, DSCR, stress tests, break-even thresholds, and a shareable report link. Strategies: ltr (long-term rental), str (short-term rental), brrr, multifamily, flip (fix-n-flip), newc (new construction). All rates/percents are FRACTIONS (0.0675 = 6.75%). Omitted operating inputs are filled with documented defaults and listed in assumptions.estimated_fields. Output is a software estimate, not financial, investment, tax or legal advice — figures are projections to verify, not recommendations. Free, no key; the response includes a shareable report_url.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| inputs | object | yes | Deal inputs in camelCase engine keys. Anything omitted gets a documented default, listed back under assumptions.estimated_fields. Minimum: price + the strategy's income driver (marketRent / adr+occup… |
| strategy | string | yes | Investment strategy to analyze. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| assumptions | object | – | estimated_fields lists every input REIzer defaulted. |
| breakdown | array | – | Ordered cash-flow / profit waterfall rows {label, amount, kind}; outflows are negative. |
| data_note | string | – | REIzer data tools that can refine this analysis (needs an API key). |
| disclaimer | string | – | Not financial advice — software estimate only. |
| inputs_used | object | – | The resolved input set the analysis ran on — caller values plus documented defaults. |
| levers | array | – | Top input changes that would each add ~$1,000/yr cash flow (STR). |
| metrics | object | yes | Headline metrics for this strategy. |
| report_url | string | – | Shareable public report page (30 days). |
| score | number | yes | 0-100 deal score. |
| sensitivity | array | – | Which input drivers move the result most — {driver, range, low_impact, high_impact, swing}, sorted by swing (STR). |
| strategy | string | yes | – |
| stress | array | – | Stress scenarios, each with a verdict. |
| summary | string | yes | Deterministic one-paragraph summary. |
| thresholds | object|null | – | – |
| upfront | array | – | Cash-into-the-deal / project-cost stack rows {label, amount, kind}. |
| verdict | string | yes | Strong / Solid / Thin / Weak. |
No examples provided.
best_use Rank the best use of a property ~167
Screen ONE property across every strategy the provided inputs qualify for and rank them by deal score — answers "what is the best use of this property?". Provide a superset of inputs (price, marketRent, adr, occupancy, rehabBudget, arv, units, …); strategies missing inputs are skipped with reasons. All rates/percents are FRACTIONS (0.0675 = 6.75%). Omitted operating inputs are filled with documented defaults and listed in assumptions.estimated_fields. Free, no key.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| inputs | object | yes | Deal inputs in camelCase engine keys. Anything omitted gets a documented default, listed back under assumptions.estimated_fields. Send a SUPERSET across strategies — whatever you know. Strategies mis… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| best_use | string | yes | Highest-scoring strategy id. |
| data_note | string | – | REIzer data tools that can refine this analysis (needs an API key). |
| disclaimer | string | – | Not financial advice — software estimate only. |
| note | string | – | – |
| ranked | array | yes | – |
| skipped | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
list_strategies List strategies and their inputs ~38
List every supported strategy with its required and optional input fields. Call this first when unsure which inputs a strategy needs. Free, no key.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| strategies | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
solve_max_offer Solve the maximum offer ~243
Reverse-solve the Maximum Allowable Offer: the highest purchase price that still meets every return target (defaults: CoC 8%, DSCR 1.20, cash flow ≥ 0; flip: 10% after-tax margin + 15% annualized ROI). Returns the MAO, the binding constraint, and per-target price ceilings. Strategies: ltr, str, brrr, multifamily, flip. Provide the deal inputs WITHOUT committing to a price (use arv or an asking price as reference). Override targets via the targets object. All rates/percents are FRACTIONS (0.0675 = 6.75%). Omitted operating inputs are filled with documented defaults and listed in assumptions.estimated_fields. Free, no key.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| inputs | object | yes | Deal inputs in camelCase engine keys. Anything omitted gets a documented default, listed back under assumptions.estimated_fields. price is optional here — the asking price or ARV anchors the price-de… |
| strategy | string | yes | – |
| targets | object | – | Return targets the price must still satisfy. Omit to use each strategy's defaults. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| binding_constraint | object | – | – |
| ceilings_per_target | object | – | – |
| disclaimer | string | – | Not financial advice — software estimate only. |
| mao | number | yes | Maximum allowable offer in dollars. |
| metrics_at_mao | object | – | – |
| strategy | string | – | – |
| summary | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
What is the Real Estate Analyzer MCP server?
Real Estate Analyzer is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.reizer/deal-analysis. Free real-estate underwriting, no key or account. 6 strategies, stress tests, max offer. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://reizer.io/mcp).
Is the Real Estate Analyzer MCP server safe to use?
Real Estate Analyzer scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Real Estate Analyzer MCP server expose?
Real Estate Analyzer exposes 4 tools: analyze_deal, best_use, solve_max_offer, list_strategies. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 688 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Real Estate Analyzer MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Real Estate Analyzer without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Real Estate Analyzer MCP server still maintained?
Real Estate Analyzer is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.