Corrie Site Check
REMOTE · CORRIE.IO
Free HTTPS and security header check from Corrie, uptime monitoring for small teams. No auth.
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 87% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Security
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 589 tokens (~196/item across 3 items; 1 tools + 2 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
- Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 0
- Server version: 1.1.0 → 1.1.1 functional
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://corrie.io/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=corrie.io | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 22 Oct 2026 | 20 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 4e7e44b0662fcbcd13118ad9c3c47dbd |
| SANs: corrie.io, *.corrie.io | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of corrie.io. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| io. | DS published | 38690 | 8 | Verified |
| corrie.io. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://static.cloudflareinsights.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://cloudflareinsights.com; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'none'; object-src 'none'; form-action 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://corrie.io/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://corrie.io/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://corrie.io/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_website Check a website's HTTPS and security headers ~396
Loads the homepage of one public website over HTTPS, the way a visitor's browser would, and reports its HTTPS setup, TLS certificate and security headers (Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, cookie flags, mixed content and server banners). Returns a score from 0 to 100, a verdict, the TLS certificate issuer and expiry date, and each finding with a severity (critical, high, medium or low) and a plain-English fix that includes nginx or Cloudflare examples. Use it for questions like 'is example.com secure?', 'what security headers is my site missing?', 'when does this site's certificate expire?' or 'why does Chrome say my site is not secure?'. Input is a bare domain (example.com) or an https:// address. A bare domain checks the homepage; if you include a path, that one page is loaded instead. It does not log in, submit forms, scan ports, crawl other pages or test for vulnerabilities, and nothing is stored. It refuses private, internal and local addresses, plain http://, ports other than 443 and addresses with a user name; those come back as an isError result with a message saying what to change. A check usually takes 1 to 10 seconds. Running it twice on the same site gives the same result unless the site changed. Read corrie://docs/scoring for how the score and verdict work.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | The public website to check: a bare domain such as example.com, or an https:// address such as https://www.example.com/. If you leave out the scheme, https:// is added. Only port 443 is allowed. Priv… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| certificate | object|null | yes | Facts about the site's TLS certificate. Fields are null when not observed. |
| counts | object | yes | Number of findings at each severity. |
| final_url | string | yes | The address after following up to 3 redirects. |
| findings | array | yes | Problems found, most severe first. Empty when nothing was found. |
| http_status | integer|null | yes | HTTP status code of the final response. |
| limitations | array | yes | What this quick check does not cover. |
| report_url | string | yes | Where a person can run the same check in a browser. |
| score | integer | yes | Starts at 100. Each finding subtracts points: critical 35, high 15, medium 6, low 2. Never below 0. |
| url | string | yes | The normalized https:// address that was requested. |
| verdict | string | yes | One-line summary based on the most severe finding. |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Corrie Site Check MCP server?
Corrie Site Check is a hosted endpoint at https://corrie.io/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · corrie.io
claude mcp add --transport http io-corrie-site-check 'https://corrie.io/mcp'
What is the Corrie Site Check MCP server?
Corrie Site Check is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.corrie/site-check. Free HTTPS and security header check from Corrie, uptime monitoring for small teams. No auth. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://corrie.io/mcp).
Is the Corrie Site Check MCP server safe to use?
Corrie Site Check scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Corrie Site Check MCP server expose?
Corrie Site Check exposes 1 tool: check_website. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 396 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Corrie Site Check MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Corrie Site Check without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Corrie Site Check MCP server still maintained?
Corrie Site Check is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Corrie Site Check MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Corrie Site Check, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.