Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

agent-intercom

NPM · AGENT-INTERCOM

Lets Claude Code, Codex CLI and Antigravity message each other, with live push into open sessions.

Available components

+3 this week 88 Trust /100

Last scanned (21 hours ago)

Scores higher than 92% of npm servers

Category Communication

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to iambashar/agent-intercom). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 16 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 552 tokens (~184/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/agent-intercom@0.2.5

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo iambashar/agent-intercom
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/iambashar/agent-intercom/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.2.5
Rekor log index 3315987510
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:50100dc73d46b43e4bcfa465ec30bb62254d3252b6ac51d66f3cbcd9c3f64f8947b4ae63d6b9b07c70a1121c016f1096e14c0e156843d9f236ed7192d

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~510 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
mail_check ~174

Fetch the unread messages addressed to you ("claude"), oldest first. Use it when you expect a reply or want to see if another agent wrote to you. Reading consumes the messages: each one is moved to your read folder and is not returned again, so act on or note what you need. With wait_seconds above 0 the call blocks until at least one message arrives or the time runs out. Returns each message as "[<id>] from <sender> (re <id>) at <time>:" followed by its body, or "no new messages". When live push is installed, new mail may already appear in your session without calling this tool.

NameTypeReqDescription
wait_secondsnumber–How long to wait for a message if the inbox is empty, in seconds (0 to 300). 0 returns immediately.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

mail_peers ~100

List every agent name that has a mailbox here, so you know valid recipients for mail_send. Read-only: it changes nothing. Returns one line per agent: "<name> - last started <ISO time>", or "never started" for an agent that has mail waiting but has not run yet. Your own name is marked "(you)". A recent start time suggests the agent is active, but it does not guarantee a session is open right now.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

mail_send ~236

Deliver a text message from you ("claude") to another coding agent's inbox, for example to hand off a task, ask a question or report a result. Call mail_peers first if you are unsure of the recipient name. To answer a message you received from mail_check, pass its id as reply_to. Each call writes one new message and never edits or removes existing mail. If the recipient has not started yet, the message waits in its inbox. Returns "sent <id> to <name>"; keep the id if you expect a reply that references it.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodystringyesMessage text, in plain text or Markdown. Include everything the recipient needs, since it cannot see your conversation.
reply_tostring–Optional. The id of the message you are answering (the value in [brackets] from mail_check), so the recipient can match the reply to its question.
tostringyesRecipient agent name as listed by mail_peers, e.g. "codex", "claude" or "gemini". Letters, digits, _ and -, with optional .suffix segments.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the agent-intercom MCP server?

agent-intercom runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y agent-intercom. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · agent-intercom

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add iambashar-agent-intercom -- npx -y agent-intercom
Common questions

What is the agent-intercom MCP server?

agent-intercom is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.iambashar/agent-intercom. Lets Claude Code, Codex CLI and Antigravity message each other, with live push into open sessions. This page covers its npm package (agent-intercom).

Is the agent-intercom MCP server safe to use?

agent-intercom scores 88 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the agent-intercom MCP server expose?

agent-intercom exposes 3 tools: mail_send, mail_check, mail_peers. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 510 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the agent-intercom MCP server still maintained?

agent-intercom is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the agent-intercom MCP server under?

agent-intercom declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.