specpack
REMOTE · PROMPT-GENERATOR-WEBSITE.COM · 2 COMPONENTS
Audit and write CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / Cursor rules; generate full build specs for new projects.
Available components
Last scanned (2 hours ago)
Scores higher than 96% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Developer Tools
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 581 tokens (~116/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage94
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 83% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 0
- Stability: unverified → pass ▲ security
- TLS certificate: unverified → pass ▲ security
- HSTS header: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- Endpoint reachability: unreachable → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
- Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
- HSTS header: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- 18 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 17 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://prompt-generator-website.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=prompt-generator-website.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 13 Sept 2026 | 12 Dec 2026 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 574ad6cdd56524aef8435eac86baa5c98af |
| SANs: prompt-generator-website.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of prompt-generator-website.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| prompt-generator-website.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://prompt-generator-website.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://prompt-generator-website.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 302 | https://prompt-generator-website.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
draft_answers Draft answers with AI ~135
Asks the server's AI (Claude) to fill the whole questionnaire from a plain-language project description; returns the project type, the answers and the assumptions it made. Takes 10-40 s and consumes one AI draft (3 free without an API key). Prefer answering get_questionnaire yourself when you already know the project; use this when you only have a one-line idea. Review the assumptions with the user before calling generate_spec.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| description | string | yes | What the project is, for whom, and what it must do (10-4000 characters) |
| type | string | – | Optional: force the project type |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_spec Generate the spec and agent files ~186
Turns questionnaire answers into a complete build specification (stack, database schema, auth flows, pages, design system, SEO, security, legal, deployment, file structure) and the matching agent files. Deterministic: the same answers always give the same bytes. Values: select/radio = one option value, multiselect = array of option values, boolean = true/false, number = number. Returns the requested files; by default AGENTS.md (full spec + working agreement) and CLAUDE.md (imports AGENTS.md) — write them at the repository root. Uses one spec from the quota (2 free without an API key).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| answers | object | yes | Question id => value, as described by get_questionnaire |
| files | array | – | Files to return. Default: ["AGENTS.md", "CLAUDE.md"] |
| type | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_questionnaire Get the questionnaire ~108
The questions for one project type: universal questions first, then type-specific ones. Each has an id, a type (text, textarea, select, radio, multiselect, boolean, number), options where relevant, and sometimes a condition (ask it only when another answer matches). Answer from what you know of the project, then pass the answers to generate_spec. Only project_name and project_description are required; skipped questions fall back to defaults.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| type | string | yes | Project type id |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_usage Plan and usage ~35
Current plan and quota usage (specs and AI drafts) for the API key, or for this address when no key is set.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_project_types List project types ~38
The project types the spec generator knows (saas, ecommerce, business, marketplace, blog, webapp, landing), with what each covers.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the specpack MCP server?
specpack is a hosted endpoint at https://prompt-generator-website.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · prompt-generator-website.com
claude mcp add --transport http the-kipdev-specpack 'https://prompt-generator-website.com/mcp'
What is the specpack MCP server?
specpack is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.THE-KIPDEV/specpack. Audit and write CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / Cursor rules; generate full build specs for new projects. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://prompt-generator-website.com/mcp).
Is the specpack MCP server safe to use?
specpack scores 88 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the specpack MCP server expose?
specpack exposes 5 tools: list_project_types, get_questionnaire, generate_spec, draft_answers, get_usage. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 502 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the specpack MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to specpack without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the specpack MCP server still maintained?
specpack is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.