Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard)
REMOTE · FLOORGUARD-KAPPA.VERCEL.APP
Sourced prop-firm daily-loss and max-drawdown rules and a drawdown-room checker. Read-only, no auth.
Available components
Last scanned (9 hours ago)
Scores higher than 82% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 501 tokens (~167/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management43
- Stability observed for 13 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 6 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.07 ▲ functional
- 4 Oct 26 73
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://floorguard-kappa.vercel.app/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.vercel.app | CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 29 Aug 2026 | 27 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | f7911168ffa7d0f4135e24792e7a52a8 |
| SANs: *.vercel.app | ||||||
| CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 7fd9e2c2d2048a0474b627a26d0868a7 |
| CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 19 Jun 2020 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of floorguard-kappa.vercel.app. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| app. | present | 23684 | 8 | Verified |
| vercel.app. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://floorguard-kappa.vercel.app/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://floorguard-kappa.vercel.app/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://floorguard-kappa.vercel.app/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_drawdown Check remaining drawdown room ~289
Remaining daily-loss and max-drawdown room in dollars for an account, the binding limit and breach flags, computed with the same model as the FloorGuard calculator. Same inputs as GET /api/v1/check.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountSize | number | yes | Nominal account size, e.g. 100000 (must be one of the program sizes when the rule is a fixed $ amount per size) |
| currentBalance | number | – | Current closed balance (default: currentEquity) |
| currentEquity | number | yes | Current equity including open P&L |
| customDailyLoss | number | – | Your own daily loss limit in $ for programs without one (e.g. Topstep optional DLL) |
| dayStartBalance | number | – | Balance at the daily reset, if positions were held through it (default: currentEquity - todayPnl) |
| highWaterMark | number | – | Peak the firm trails from (highest EOD balance / closed balance / intraday equity, per program mode). Default: computed like the site calculator |
| program | string | yes | Program id from /api/v1/firms, e.g. ftmo_2step |
| startingBalance | number | – | Initial balance the percentages apply to (default: accountSize) |
| todayPnl | number | – | Today's P&L since the firm's daily reset, closed + open (default 0) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_rules Get rules for one program ~81
Full daily-loss and max-drawdown rules for one program (static/trailing mode, lock, reset time, notes, official source links, firm copy-trading/automation policy). Same as GET /api/v1/rules?program=<id>.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| program | string | yes | Program id from list_firms, e.g. ftmo_2step |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_firms List prop firms and programs ~42
List supported prop firms and their programs: program ids, account sizes, verified flags and last-verified dates. Same data as GET /api/v1/firms.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) MCP server?
Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) is a hosted endpoint at https://floorguard-kappa.vercel.app/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · floorguard-kappa.vercel.app
claude mcp add --transport http kburrus64-max-prop-firm-rules 'https://floorguard-kappa.vercel.app/api/mcp'
What is the Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) MCP server?
Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.kburrus64-max/prop-firm-rules. Sourced prop-firm daily-loss and max-drawdown rules and a drawdown-room checker. Read-only, no auth. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://floorguard-kappa.vercel.app/api/mcp).
Is the Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) MCP server safe to use?
Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) MCP server expose?
Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) exposes 3 tools: list_firms, get_rules, check_drawdown. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 412 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) MCP server still maintained?
Prop Firm Rules (FloorGuard) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.