AIGROW
REMOTE · AIGROW.GG
Does AI recommend a business? The free AI visibility scan and the AI Visibility Index, by AIGROW.
Available components
Last scanned (12 hours ago)
Scores higher than 89% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 25 Oct 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 693 tokens (~346/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
- Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “check_ai_visibility” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 16 Oct 26 +10
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- 15 Oct 26 −9
- Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 25 Oct 2026 · Probed https://aigrow.gg/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=aigrow.gg | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 6 Sept 2026 | 5 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 4f04fdafb96f3b7f0e4949798feadcdc |
| SANs: aigrow.gg, *.aigrow.gg | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of aigrow.gg. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| gg. | present | 4975 | 8 | Verified |
| aigrow.gg. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| aigrow.gg. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://aigrow.gg/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://aigrow.gg/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://aigrow.gg/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
ai_index_lookup AI Visibility Index lookup ~214
Reads the AI Visibility Index by AIGROW: for a kind of business and a city or country, which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok name when buyers ask for a recommendation, with each one's share of the answers, the edition and the link to the Index page. Covers 44 categories (local trades such as dentists and plumbers by city, software such as CRM by country) across 88 cities and 20 countries. Category and place may be written in any of the eleven supported languages.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | The kind of business, for example "dentist", "Zahnarzt" or "crm". |
| language | string | – | The language to answer in, as an ISO 639-1 code: en, de, fr, es, pt, it, nl, pl, sv, da or no. Any other code answers in English. |
| place | string | yes | A city or a country, for example "Berlin", "Milano" or "Germany". |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_ai_visibility Check AI visibility ~270
Runs AIGROW's free AI visibility scan of one business: reads its website, writes the buyer questions a customer would ask an assistant, puts them to the models behind ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Meta AI, and reports how often the business was named, a score out of 100, who was named instead and what holds it back. Takes about three minutes and reports progress as the answers come in. Shares the free scan's limits on aigrow.gg: two new websites an hour per network address (a hosted client shares one among its users), and a daily cap. A city or category makes it a new scan, even of a website scanned before.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | What the business is, for example "dentist" or "CRM software". |
| city | string | – | The city or area the business serves, if the website may not say. |
| language | string | – | The language to answer in, as an ISO 639-1 code: en, de, fr, es, pt, it, nl, pl, sv, da or no. Any other code answers in English. |
| name | string | – | The business name, if known. |
| website | string | yes | The business's website address, for example bakery-example.com. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the AIGROW MCP server?
AIGROW is a hosted endpoint at https://aigrow.gg/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · aigrow.gg
claude mcp add --transport http gg-aigrow-ai-visibility 'https://aigrow.gg/mcp'
What is the AIGROW MCP server?
AIGROW is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as gg.aigrow/ai-visibility. Does AI recommend a business? The free AI visibility scan and the AI Visibility Index, by AIGROW. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://aigrow.gg/mcp).
Is the AIGROW MCP server safe to use?
AIGROW scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the AIGROW MCP server expose?
AIGROW exposes 2 tools: check_ai_visibility, ai_index_lookup. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 484 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the AIGROW MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to AIGROW without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the AIGROW MCP server still maintained?
AIGROW is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.