io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview
MCPB · GHOST-POST-PREVIEW.MCPB
Read a draft post the way its audience and its ranking system will: fold test, hook audit,...
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 73% of MCPB servers
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
Provenance & Transparency32
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- License check failed: no license is declared. See how to fix → Fail
- Actively maintained (last published 14 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 909 tokens (~82/item across 11 items; 11 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
- Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage93
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 79% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 11 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- 26 Oct 26 0
- Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.10 ▲ functional
- 21 Oct 26 36
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/farssaadeldin7-ux/claude-plugin-suite/releases/download/mcpb-v0.1.3/ghost-post-preview.mcpb@0.1.3
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
billing_portal ~30
Open the Stripe billing portal to change plan, update the card, or cancel the Ghost Post Preview subscription.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
draft_lint ~120
Mechanical checks on a draft with the evidence quoted: links in the body where the platform punishes them, hashtags on X, throat-clearing openers, yes/no question openers, engagement bait, wall-of-text shape, plus counts (characters, first-line words, position of the first number). Facts only — no scores, no verdicts. Requires a paid plan; counts against the monthly preview quota.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| platform | string | yes | Platform id, e.g. "linkedin". |
| text | string | yes | The exact draft, including line breaks. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
fold_test ~123
Reconstruct exactly what a reader sees before "see more" truncates the post on a given platform: the visible fragment, what got cut, and the first hidden line. Deterministic mechanics from the truncation table — it does not judge the fragment.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| part | string | – | On Reddit and YouTube the title truncates separately from the body: "title" or "body" (default). Ignored elsewhere. |
| platform | string | yes | Platform id, e.g. "linkedin". |
| text | string | yes | The exact draft, including line breaks. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
license_activate ~67
Store and activate a Ghost Post Preview licence key on this machine. Use when the user pastes a licence key, or after a purchase completes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| license_key | string | yes | The licence key, e.g. PS-XXX-00000-00000-00000-0000 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
license_status ~50
Check the Ghost Post Preview licence on this machine: plan, included capabilities, remaining quota and seat usage. Call this when a paid tool reports a licence problem, or when the user asks what their plan includes.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_plans ~24
List the available Ghost Post Preview plans, prices and what each one includes.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
log_call ~150
Record the review's call — verdict, band, confidence — in the local prediction log so the actual result can be checked against it later. A prediction that is never checked has no error bar. Requires a paid plan; the licence check is the only thing this tool sends anywhere.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| band | string | – | One of: well_below, below, at, above, well_above. Omit if no baseline was supplied. |
| confidence | string | – | low, medium or high. |
| hook_summary | string | – | The first line as reviewed, for later recognition. |
| notes | string | – | – |
| platform | string | – | – |
| verdict | string | yes | ship, rewrite or kill. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
platform_mechanics ~71
What each platform's ranking system rewards and suppresses, its fold limits, and its format rules. All approximate and directional — platforms change without announcement. Omit platform to list all of them.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| platform | string | – | linkedin, x, instagram, tiktok, reddit, youtube, facebook or threads. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
record_result ~79
Record how a logged call actually landed, as a band against the same baseline. This is what gives the review record an error bar. Requires a paid plan.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| actual_band | string | yes | One of: well_below, below, at, above, well_above. |
| call_id | string | yes | – |
| notes | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
review_calls ~56
The record of past calls and a plain tally of how they landed — exact band, one band off, further out. Counting only; it makes no new claim. Requires a paid plan.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | number | – | Default 20. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
start_checkout ~74
Begin a Ghost Post Preview purchase. Returns a Stripe Checkout link. Call list_plans first if the user has not chosen a plan.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| string | – | Email address for the receipt and licence. | |
| plan | string | yes | Plan id: "pro" or "team". Use list_plans to see the options. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview MCP server?
io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.
mcpb · ghost-post-preview.mcpb
Download bundleCheck the download matches the SHA-256 the MCP registry declares before you open it. If it does not match, do not open the file.
SHA-256
f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8
macOS / Linux
echo "f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8 ghost-post-preview.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c
Windows (PowerShell)
(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\ghost-post-preview.mcpb).Hash -eq "f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8"
Run it in the folder you saved the bundle to, then open the file with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.
What is the io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview MCP server?
io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview. Read a draft post the way its audience and its ranking system will: fold test, hook audit,... This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/farssaadeldin7-ux/claude-plugin-suite/releases/download/mcpb-v0.1.3/ghost-post-preview.mcpb).
Is the io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview MCP server safe to use?
io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview scores 42 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview MCP server expose?
io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview exposes 11 tools: platform_mechanics, fold_test, draft_lint, log_call, record_result, and 6 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 844 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.