# io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview (mcpb · ghost-post-preview.mcpb)

Read a draft post the way its audience and its ranking system will: fold test, hook audit,...

- Trust score: 42/100 (low)
- Change this week: +3
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-11-04

## Components

- mcpb · `ghost-post-preview.mcpb`: 42/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/farssaadeldin7-ux-ghost-post-preview/ghost-post-preview.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/farssaadeldin7-ux-ghost-post-preview/ghost-post-preview)

## Channel facts

- Registry: `mcpb`
- Package: `https://github.com/farssaadeldin7-ux/claude-plugin-suite/releases/download/mcpb-v0.1.3/ghost-post-preview.mcpb`
- Version: `0.1.3`
- Transport: `stdio`
- SHA-256: `f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-11-04.

- **Supply Chain Security**: 0/100
  - No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
  - Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
  - Install-script risk not yet assessed.
  - Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
- **Provenance & Transparency**: 32/100
  - Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL.
  - Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published.
  - License check failed: no license is declared.
  - Actively maintained (last published 14 days ago).
  - Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 84/100
  - 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Tool/resource definitions use about 909 tokens (~82/item across 11 items; 11 tools + 0 resources), lean.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 47/100
  - Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 93/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 79% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 11 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 20/100
  - Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28.

**Unverified: 1 category.** A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

## Install

### How do I install the io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview MCP server?

io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.

- Download bundle: `https://github.com/farssaadeldin7-ux/claude-plugin-suite/releases/download/mcpb-v0.1.3/ghost-post-preview.mcpb`
- SHA-256: `f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8`

### Verify on macOS / Linux

```bash
echo "f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8  ghost-post-preview.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c
```

### Verify on Windows (PowerShell)

```powershell
(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\ghost-post-preview.mcpb).Hash -eq "f7b974ddf6baafe766846cf7a32eca2f166c813d420f6b752995a2aa4d32a3f8"
```

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-11-03 (score 42, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-01 (score 41, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-29 (score 40, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-27 (score 39, +1)

- [security regression] Provenance: unverified → fail

### 2026-10-26 (score 38, 0)

- [security regression] Provenance: fail → unverified

### 2026-10-25 (score 38, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-10-24 (score 37, +1)

- [functional improvement] Stability: unverified → 0.10

### 2026-10-21 (score 36)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (11)

### `platform_mechanics` (~71 tokens)

What each platform's ranking system rewards and suppresses, its fold limits, and its format rules. All approximate and directional — platforms change without announcement. Omit platform to list all of them.

Input parameters:

- `platform` (string): linkedin, x, instagram, tiktok, reddit, youtube, facebook or threads.

### `fold_test` (~123 tokens)

Reconstruct exactly what a reader sees before "see more" truncates the post on a given platform: the visible fragment, what got cut, and the first hidden line. Deterministic mechanics from the truncation table — it does not judge the fragment.

Input parameters:

- `part` (string): On Reddit and YouTube the title truncates separately from the body: "title" or "body" (default). Ignored elsewhere.
- `platform` (string, required): Platform id, e.g. "linkedin".
- `text` (string, required): The exact draft, including line breaks.

### `draft_lint` (~120 tokens)

Mechanical checks on a draft with the evidence quoted: links in the body where the platform punishes them, hashtags on X, throat-clearing openers, yes/no question openers, engagement bait, wall-of-text shape, plus counts (characters, first-line words, position of the first number). Facts only — no scores, no verdicts. Requires a paid plan; counts against the monthly preview quota.

Input parameters:

- `platform` (string, required): Platform id, e.g. "linkedin".
- `text` (string, required): The exact draft, including line breaks.

### `log_call` (~150 tokens)

Record the review's call — verdict, band, confidence — in the local prediction log so the actual result can be checked against it later. A prediction that is never checked has no error bar. Requires a paid plan; the licence check is the only thing this tool sends anywhere.

Input parameters:

- `band` (string): One of: well_below, below, at, above, well_above. Omit if no baseline was supplied.
- `confidence` (string): low, medium or high.
- `hook_summary` (string): The first line as reviewed, for later recognition.
- `notes` (string)
- `platform` (string)
- `verdict` (string, required): ship, rewrite or kill.

### `record_result` (~79 tokens)

Record how a logged call actually landed, as a band against the same baseline. This is what gives the review record an error bar. Requires a paid plan.

Input parameters:

- `actual_band` (string, required): One of: well_below, below, at, above, well_above.
- `call_id` (string, required)
- `notes` (string)

### `review_calls` (~56 tokens)

The record of past calls and a plain tally of how they landed — exact band, one band off, further out. Counting only; it makes no new claim. Requires a paid plan.

Input parameters:

- `limit` (number): Default 20.

### `license_status` (~50 tokens)

Check the Ghost Post Preview licence on this machine: plan, included capabilities, remaining quota and seat usage. Call this when a paid tool reports a licence problem, or when the user asks what their plan includes.

### `license_activate` (~67 tokens)

Store and activate a Ghost Post Preview licence key on this machine. Use when the user pastes a licence key, or after a purchase completes.

Input parameters:

- `license_key` (string, required): The licence key, e.g. PS-XXX-00000-00000-00000-0000

### `start_checkout` (~74 tokens)

Begin a Ghost Post Preview purchase. Returns a Stripe Checkout link. Call list_plans first if the user has not chosen a plan.

Input parameters:

- `email` (string): Email address for the receipt and licence.
- `plan` (string, required): Plan id: "pro" or "team". Use list_plans to see the options.

### `list_plans` (~24 tokens)

List the available Ghost Post Preview plans, prices and what each one includes.

### `billing_portal` (~30 tokens)

Open the Stripe billing portal to change plan, update the card, or cancel the Ghost Post Preview subscription.

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: Provenance. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/farssaadeldin7-ux-ghost-post-preview/ghost-post-preview#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-11-04: 42
- 2026-11-03: 42
- 2026-11-02: 41
- 2026-11-01: 41
- 2026-10-31: 40
- 2026-10-30: 40
- 2026-10-29: 40
- 2026-10-28: 39
- 2026-10-27: 39
- 2026-10-26: 38
- 2026-10-25: 38
- 2026-10-24: 37
- 2026-10-23: 36
- 2026-10-22: 36
- 2026-10-21: 36

## Common questions

### What is the io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview MCP server?

io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview. Read a draft post the way its audience and its ranking system will: fold test, hook audit,... This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/farssaadeldin7-ux/claude-plugin-suite/releases/download/mcpb-v0.1.3/ghost-post-preview.mcpb).

### Is the io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview MCP server safe to use?

io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview scores 42 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview MCP server expose?

io.github.farssaadeldin7-ux/ghost-post-preview exposes 11 tools: platform_mechanics, fold_test, draft_lint, log_call, record_result, and 6 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 844 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

## Links

- Repository: https://github.com/farssaadeldin7-ux/claude-plugin-suite
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/farssaadeldin7-ux-ghost-post-preview/ghost-post-preview.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/farssaadeldin7-ux-ghost-post-preview/ghost-post-preview.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/farssaadeldin7-ux-ghost-post-preview/ghost-post-preview