EDGAR Filings
PYPI · EDGAR-FILINGS-MCP · SCANNED SEP 21
SEC 10-K/10-Q symbols, segment revenue, BDC non-accrual, and Form 4 lines with citations.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security99
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 7 of 62 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency32
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- License check failed: no license is declared. See how to fix → Fail
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 518 tokens (~129/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
How do I install the EDGAR Filings MCP server?
EDGAR Filings runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx edgar-filings-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · edgar-filings-mcp
claude mcp add dxfory-edgar-mcp -- uvx edgar-filings-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"dxfory-edgar-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"edgar-filings-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"dxfory-edgar-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"edgar-filings-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add dxfory-edgar-mcp -- uvx edgar-filings-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"dxfory-edgar-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"edgar-filings-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add dxfory-edgar-mcp --command uvx --arg edgar-filings-mcp
mcp_servers:
dxfory-edgar-mcp:
command: "uvx"
args: ["edgar-filings-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"dxfory-edgar-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"edgar-filings-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add dxfory-edgar-mcp -t stdio -c uvx -a edgar-filings-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"dxfory-edgar-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"edgar-filings-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 21 Sept 26 65
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/edgar-filings-mcp@1.1.2
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 62 packages
| Packages resolved | 62 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 6 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_bdc_nonaccrual ~115
Non-accrual investments from a BDC 10-K or 10-Q, cited to the filing. Use this instead of guessing private-credit quality. ticker_or_cik must be an SEC BDC (814- filer) such as ARCC. Operating companies like NVDA raise. Non-accrual is the filer's tagged status, not Fitch PCDR and not PIK.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accession | – | – | – |
| form | string | – | – |
| ticker_or_cik | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_form4 ~67
Recent Form 4 insider filings: who, role, activity, and transaction lines. limit: 1-20 filings, newest first. P/S are open_market true; A/M/F are false.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| ticker_or_cik | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_segment_revenue ~109
Dimensioned XBRL revenue facts from a 10-K or 10-Q (product, business, geographic axes). This is filing data, not a consolidated income statement. ticker_or_cik: ticker like NVDA or a CIK. accession: optional filing accession; default is the latest of `form`. form: 10-K (default) or 10-Q.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accession | – | – | – |
| form | string | – | – |
| ticker_or_cik | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_trading_symbols ~117
Every dei:TradingSymbol fact on a 10-K or 10-Q, plus the legacy entity_info ticker scalar. Use this when you need the common stock ticker versus preferred, notes, or dual-class symbols. ticker_or_cik: ticker like NVDA or a CIK. accession: optional filing accession; default is the latest of `form`. form: 10-K (default) or 10-Q.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accession | – | – | – |
| form | string | – | – |
| ticker_or_cik | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the EDGAR Filings MCP server?
EDGAR Filings is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Dxfory/edgar-mcp. SEC 10-K/10-Q symbols, segment revenue, BDC non-accrual, and Form 4 lines with citations. This page covers its PyPI package (edgar-filings-mcp).
Is the EDGAR Filings MCP server safe to use?
EDGAR Filings scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 21 September 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the EDGAR Filings MCP server expose?
EDGAR Filings exposes 4 tools: get_trading_symbols, get_segment_revenue, get_bdc_nonaccrual, get_form4. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 408 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the EDGAR Filings MCP server still maintained?
EDGAR Filings is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.