Uganda Online Business Directory
REMOTE · UG-ONLINE.DOMUS-DEI-TECH.WORKERS.DEV
Search a Ugandan business directory for businesses and services by keyword, category, or district
Available components
Last scanned (5 hours ago)
Scores higher than 85% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category Search and Retrieval
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability85
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 617 tokens (~88/item across 7 items; 5 tools + 2 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
- Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage98
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 94% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
- Capabilities
Checks we could not complete (1)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- HTTPS in Endpoint SecurityHTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement.
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 0
- Tool coverage: 100% → 94% ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 63 → 88 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: excellent → good functional
- New resource “marketplace-results-widget” functional
- Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 functional
- New tool “search_marketplace” functional
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://ug-online.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=domus-dei-tech.workers.dev | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 9 Oct 2026 | 7 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 65ff53a2461640e211e3b6a6c5cf82db2d4 |
| SANs: *.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev, domus-dei-tech.workers.dev | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of ug-online.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | DS published | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| workers.dev. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://ug-online.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://ug-online.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_business ~65
Fetch full public details for one business listing by id, including contact info (phone, WhatsApp, email, website). Use the id returned by search_businesses.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string|number | yes | Listing id, as returned by search_businesses (accepts string or number) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_listing_signup_link ~80
Return the link for a Ugandan business owner to create a free listing in the Muyiribi directory. This tool does not create, edit, or verify any listing itself — the business owner completes signup and listing creation on the website. Use this whenever a business is not found in search results, or when a business owner asks how to get listed.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_categories ~29
List every business category available in the directory, so a search can be narrowed to an exact category name.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_businesses ~127
Search the Muyiribi Uganda business directory by keyword, category, and/or district, and show the matches as a card list.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Exact category name from list_categories. Use it when the request fits a category. Optional. |
| district | string | – | District name, e.g. Kampala |
| keyword | string | – | Several plain words describing what is needed, e.g. 'tv lcd repair'. Any word can match; listings matching more words rank higher. Not a phrase. |
| limit | integer | – | Number of results, 1 to 5 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_marketplace ~285
Search available marketplace product listings in Uganda so users can compare options. Supply complete alternate item phrases in synonyms (e.g. wedding dress and bridal gown for wedding gown). Relevant listings are ranked and capped; price bounds are in UGX. Results include original marketplace links; confirm current availability, condition and seller details there. Explicit price sorts return a single unscored page. For businesses or service providers instead, use search_businesses.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_fetch_pages | integer | – | Maximum marketplace pages fetched |
| max_price | integer | – | Maximum price in UGX |
| min_price | integer | – | Minimum price in UGX |
| min_relevance_score | integer | – | Minimum complete-phrase score; two-word phrases score at least 2 |
| page | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | Item to search for, e.g. wedding gown |
| region | string | – | Marketplace region slug, if known; omit rather than guessing a district-to-slug mapping |
| sort | string | – | rel/new: newest-first with phrase ranking; price sorts: one unscored page |
| source | string | – | Optional marketplace source identifier if supported; omit to use the default source |
| synonyms | array | – | Complete alternative item phrases, e.g. ['wedding dress', 'bridal gown'] |
| target_results | integer | – | Maximum results returned |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Uganda Online Business Directory MCP server?
Uganda Online Business Directory is a hosted endpoint at https://ug-online.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · ug-online.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev
claude mcp add --transport http domusdeiug-muyiribi 'https://ug-online.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev/mcp'
What is the Uganda Online Business Directory MCP server?
Uganda Online Business Directory is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.domusdeiug/muyiribi. Search a Ugandan business directory for businesses and services by keyword, category, or district. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://ug-online.domus-dei-tech.workers.dev/mcp).
Is the Uganda Online Business Directory MCP server safe to use?
Uganda Online Business Directory scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Uganda Online Business Directory MCP server expose?
Uganda Online Business Directory exposes 5 tools: search_marketplace, search_businesses, get_business, get_listing_signup_link, list_categories. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 586 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Uganda Online Business Directory MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Uganda Online Business Directory without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Uganda Online Business Directory MCP server still maintained?
Uganda Online Business Directory is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Uganda Online Business Directory MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Uganda Online Business Directory, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 9 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Uganda Online Business Directory: HTTPS. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.