Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call)
REMOTE · AGENT-TOOLS.FALING-BOT.WORKERS.DEV
URL-to-Markdown ($0.002) and summarization ($0.003), paid per call in USDC on Solana via x402.
Available components
Last scanned (7 hours ago)
Scores higher than 43% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Crypto and Web3
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security46
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 7 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability60
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1391 tokens (~198/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
- Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage94
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 81% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 0
- Tool “token_verdict” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 0
- Tool “api_endpoint” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “api_lookup” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “site_contacts” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “solana_token_check” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “summarize” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “token_verdict” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “url_to_markdown” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 153 → 194 ▼ functional
- 28 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 27 Oct 26 57
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://agent-tools.faling-bot.workers.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=faling-bot.workers.dev | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 26 Oct 2026 | 24 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6ecc92800ad6b4807cc7ab432cd7c94e47d |
| SANs: *.faling-bot.workers.dev, faling-bot.workers.dev | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of agent-tools.faling-bot.workers.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| workers.dev. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://agent-tools.faling-bot.workers.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://agent-tools.faling-bot.workers.dev/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
api_endpoint ~179
Find the exact operation in a public API's OpenAPI spec for a task: method, path, parameters, request body fields, auth. Deterministic search, no LLM. Input: {api, query}. Optional {spec_url} if you already know the spec. Costs $0.002 USDC per call via x402 (Base preferred, or Solana); no charge on errors. Free tier: pass free_trial=true (10 calls/day).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| api | string | yes | – |
| free_trial | boolean | – | set true to use the free tier (10 calls/day) without payment |
| query | string | yes | what you want to do, e.g. 'list repository issues' |
| spec_url | string | – | – |
| x402_payment | string | – | base64 x402 payment payload; omit to receive payment requirements |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
api_lookup ~193
Look up any public API for an agent: finds its OpenAPI spec and llms.txt/docs, and returns base URL, auth scheme, rate-limit and error notes, key endpoints and source links (LLM-condensed, cached 7d). Input: {api} (name like 'stripe', a domain, or docs URL), optional {question}. Costs $0.005 USDC per call via x402 (Base preferred, or Solana); no charge on errors. Free tier: pass free_trial=true (10 calls/day).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| api | string | yes | API name, domain or docs URL |
| free_trial | boolean | – | set true to use the free tier (10 calls/day) without payment |
| question | string | – | optional focus, e.g. 'how to create a payment' |
| x402_payment | string | – | base64 x402 payment payload; omit to receive payment requirements |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
site_contacts ~159
Company/website enrichment: crawl a domain's homepage plus contact/about pages and return public emails, phone numbers, social profiles (X, LinkedIn, GitHub, etc.), page title/description and detected tech. Input: {url} or {domain}. Costs $0.005 USDC per call via x402 (Base preferred, or Solana); no charge on errors. Free tier: pass free_trial=true (10 calls/day).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | – | – |
| free_trial | boolean | – | set true to use the free tier (10 calls/day) without payment |
| url | string | – | website URL or bare domain |
| x402_payment | string | – | base64 x402 payment payload; omit to receive payment requirements |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
solana_token_check ~145
Solana SPL token snapshot + rug-risk flags: name/symbol, supply, decimals, USD price (when indexed), mint & freeze authority status, top-10 holder concentration, token program. Input: {mint}. Costs $0.003 USDC per call via x402 (Base preferred, or Solana); no charge on errors. Free tier: pass free_trial=true (10 calls/day).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| free_trial | boolean | – | set true to use the free tier (10 calls/day) without payment |
| mint | string | yes | SPL token mint address |
| x402_payment | string | – | base64 x402 payment payload; omit to receive payment requirements |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
summarize ~135
Summarize text or a web page URL into concise bullet points (LLM, Llama 3.1 8B fp8). Input: {text} or {url}, optional {max_words}. Costs $0.003 USDC per call via x402 (Base preferred, or Solana); no charge on errors.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_words | number | – | – |
| text | string | – | text to summarize (max 12000 chars) |
| url | string | – | or a page URL to fetch and summarize |
| x402_payment | string | – | base64 x402 payment payload; omit to receive payment requirements |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
token_verdict ~403
Is this crypto token safe? Use whenever a user or agent asks if a token is a scam, rug pull or honeypot, or before buying, swapping, approving or listing a token on Base (0x ERC-20) or Solana (mint). Returns a grade SAFE / CAUTION / RISKY / DANGER, a 0-100 score and plain-English reasons from live on-chain contract checks (upgradeable proxy, active owner, mint/blacklist/pause functions; Solana mint/freeze authority, top holders) plus DEX liquidity, 24h volume, buys/sells, price change and pair age. Input: {tokenAddress, chain?} (chain auto-detected). Typical latency 1-3 s. Not financial advice. Costs $0.008 USDC per call via x402 (Base preferred, or Solana); no charge on errors. Free tier: pass free_trial=true (10 calls/day). Example output: {"chain":"base","grade":"CAUTION","score":79,"one_liner":"Active owner can pause/blacklist transfers","reasons":["has an active owner","pausable transfers","capped at CAUTION: an active owner can pause or blacklist transfers (your sell could be blocked)"],"token":{"name":"Degen","symbol":"DEGEN","decimals":18},"market":{"pools":30,"liquidity_usd":261202,"volume_24h_usd":48000,"buys_24h":900,"sells_24h":850,"oldest_pair_age_days":900}}
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| chain | string | – | – |
| free_trial | boolean | – | set true to use the free tier (10 calls/day) without payment |
| tokenAddress | string | yes | Base 0x token contract or Solana mint |
| x402_payment | string | – | base64 x402 payment payload; omit to receive payment requirements |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
url_to_markdown ~112
Fetch a public web page and return clean Markdown (title, main text, links). Input: {url}. Costs $0.002 USDC per call via x402 (Base preferred, or Solana); no charge on errors.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_chars | number | – | truncate output (default 20000, max 50000) |
| url | string | yes | http(s) URL of the page |
| x402_payment | string | – | base64 x402 payment payload; omit to receive payment requirements |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) MCP server?
Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) is a hosted endpoint at https://agent-tools.faling-bot.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · agent-tools.faling-bot.workers.dev
claude mcp add --transport http dev-workers-faling-bot-agent-tools-x402-web-tool 'https://agent-tools.faling-bot.workers.dev/mcp'
What is the Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) MCP server?
Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.workers.faling-bot.agent-tools/x402-web-tools. URL-to-Markdown ($0.002) and summarization ($0.003), paid per call in USDC on Solana via x402. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://agent-tools.faling-bot.workers.dev/mcp).
Is the Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) MCP server safe to use?
Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) scores 61 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) MCP server expose?
Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) exposes 7 tools: url_to_markdown, summarize, site_contacts, solana_token_check, api_lookup, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,326 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) MCP server still maintained?
Agent Tools (x402 pay-per-call) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.