SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402)
REMOTE · SCV-AGENT.ONLINE
Honeypot & rug-pull detection, token risk feed, wallet risk, approvals audit. x402 USDC on Base.
Available components
Last scanned (23 hours ago)
Scores higher than 43% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Crypto and Web3
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security46
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS check failed: the endpoint is reachable over plaintext HTTP. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 496 tokens (~99/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
- Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 0
- Server version: 1.7.3 → 1.7.4 functional
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Server version: 1.7.1 → 1.7.3 functional
- 27 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 26 Oct 26 57
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://scv-agent.online/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=scv-agent.online | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 24 Oct 2026 | 22 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 524788d20fea1cdb005da81096cd00e3d92 |
| SANs: *.scv-agent.online, scv-agent.online | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of scv-agent.online. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| online. | present | 30961 | 13 | Verified |
| scv-agent.online. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://scv-agent.online/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://scv-agent.online/mcp | Served over HTTP | 200 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
scv_approvals ~68
Paid token approvals audit ($0.01 USDC via x402): active ERC-20 approvals of a wallet, unlimited/unknown spender detection.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| network | string | – | default: eth |
| wallet | string | yes | EVM wallet, 0x + 40 hex |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
scv_feed ~74
Paid fresh-token feed with instant risk scores ($0.005 USDC via x402): newest tokens creating liquidity pairs, market data included.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| count | integer | – | default 25 |
| min_liquidity | number | – | only pools with liquidity >= this USD |
| network | string | – | default: base |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
scv_honeypot ~104
Paid honeypot check ($0.005 USDC via x402): can this token be sold, or is it a trap? Trading gate, on-chain blacklist probe, taxes, mint/pause, proxy. Verdict HONEYPOT_LIKELY/SUSPICIOUS/CAUTION/UNLIKELY.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | yes | EVM token contract, 0x + 40 hex |
| network | string | – | default: eth |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
scv_scan ~96
Paid rug-pull risk scan of an EVM contract ($0.005 USDC via x402). Returns score 0-100, verdict, flags (mint/pause/blacklist/tax/proxy/ownership).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | yes | EVM contract address, 0x + 40 hex |
| network | string | – | default: eth |
| verify | boolean | – | check verified sources (default true) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
scv_wallet_risk ~89
Paid wallet risk check ($0.01 USDC via x402): drainer/phishing blacklists (ScamSniffer+MEW), on-chain profile, optional token relation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| network | string | – | default: eth |
| token | string | – | optional: relation to this token |
| wallet | string | yes | EVM wallet, 0x + 40 hex |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) MCP server?
SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) is a hosted endpoint at https://scv-agent.online/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · scv-agent.online
claude mcp add --transport http polkovnikvasinb-scv 'https://scv-agent.online/mcp'
What is the SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) MCP server?
SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.PolkovnikVasinB/scv. Honeypot & rug-pull detection, token risk feed, wallet risk, approvals audit. x402 USDC on Base. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://scv-agent.online/mcp).
Is the SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) MCP server safe to use?
SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) scores 61 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) MCP server expose?
SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) exposes 5 tools: scv_scan, scv_feed, scv_wallet_risk, scv_approvals, scv_honeypot. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 431 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) MCP server still maintained?
SCV - Smart Contract Verification (x402) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.