Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

CyberMax Data

REMOTE · DATA.CYBERMAXTOOLS.COM

Free US data lookups: ZIP demographics, CISA KEV/EPSS CVEs, domain rank, county spending, recalls.

+3 this week 83 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 minutes ago)

Scores higher than 87% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 580 tokens (~82/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
  • Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://data.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=cybermaxtools.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 3 Oct 2026 1 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 2c11aa4177ba1b4c131d2f5953907a77
SANs: cybermaxtools.com, data.cybermaxtools.com, *.data.cybermaxtools.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of data.cybermaxtools.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
cybermaxtools.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://data.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://data.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry HTTPS enforced 301 https://data.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~531 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
county_federal_spending ~82

FY2025 federal prime contract and grant obligations in a US county (USAspending.gov, place of performance): dollars, per-resident values, population and the county's contract rank in its state.

NameTypeReqDescription
county_fipsstringyes5-digit county FIPS code, e.g. "51059" (Fairfax County, VA)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cve_kev_lookup ~95

Check whether a CVE is in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog; if so return vendor, product, date added, federal due date, known ransomware use, EPSS probability/percentile, CVSS score/severity/vector, CWE and required action.

NameTypeReqDescription
cve_idstringyesCVE identifier, e.g. "CVE-2021-44228"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

domain_rank ~91

Link-graph rank of a popular website (top 5,000): Common Crawl harmonic-centrality and PageRank rank, hosts crawled, previous-crawl rank, Majestic Million rank and referring subnets. For any other domain use Linkheft on Apify (apify.com/cybermax/domain-authority).

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyesRegistrable domain, e.g. "github.com"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

latest_kev ~58

List the CVEs most recently added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, newest first, with EPSS, CVSS and due date in the summary.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–How many items (1-50)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

latest_recalls ~44

List the newest US vehicle and equipment recalls from NHTSA, newest first, with risk and remedy.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–How many items (1-50)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

vehicle_recall ~76

Look up an NHTSA vehicle/equipment recall campaign from the last 12 months: manufacturer, component, units affected, do-not-drive and park-outside flags, summary, risk, remedy and affected make/model/year list.

NameTypeReqDescription
campaignstringyesNHTSA campaign number, e.g. "26V601000"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

zip_lookup ~85

Look up a US ZIP code: city, state, county, coordinates, time zone and Census ACS 2020-2024 demographics (population, median age, household and per-capita income, median home value, median gross rent, housing units, owner-occupied share).

NameTypeReqDescription
zip_codestringyes5-digit US ZIP code, e.g. "10001"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the CyberMax Data MCP server?

CyberMax Data is a hosted endpoint at https://data.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · data.cybermaxtools.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-workers-cybermax-tools-cybermax-cybermax-dat 'https://data.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry'
Common questions

What is the CyberMax Data MCP server?

CyberMax Data is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.workers.cybermax-tools.cybermax/cybermax-data. Free US data lookups: ZIP demographics, CISA KEV/EPSS CVEs, domain rank, county spending, recalls. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://data.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry).

Is the CyberMax Data MCP server safe to use?

CyberMax Data scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the CyberMax Data MCP server expose?

CyberMax Data exposes 7 tools: zip_lookup, cve_kev_lookup, latest_kev, domain_rank, county_federal_spending, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 531 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the CyberMax Data MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to CyberMax Data without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the CyberMax Data MCP server still maintained?

CyberMax Data is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.