Orbitwren
REMOTE · ORBITWREN.CYBERMAXTOOLS.COM
Orbital data center & space AI compute tracker MCP: projects, launches, orbits, alerts. 100 free/day
Available components
Last scanned (17 hours ago)
Scores higher than 74% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.
Category Maps and Location
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 816 tokens (~136/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management43
- Stability observed for 13 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Oct 26 72
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=cybermaxtools.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 3 Oct 2026 | 1 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 308624ed6942b3d50e71ca721704e6da |
| SANs: cybermaxtools.com, orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com, *.orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| cybermaxtools.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compute_satellite_orbits Compute satellite orbits ~83
CelesTrak orbit elements with perigee/apogee and period for tracked orbital-compute satellites (by NORAD ID or project).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| norad | string | – | NORAD catalog number(s), comma separated (empty = every tracked compute satellite) |
| project | string | – | Tracker project id (part of it), e.g. starcloud |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
next_compute_launch Next orbital-compute launch ~46
The next launch carrying a tracked orbital data center / space AI compute project, with NET, window, status, seconds to launch and the projects on board (null when none is scheduled).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
orbital_compute_alerts Orbital data center alerts (paid key) ~125
Orbitwren Alerts: classified events for orbital data centers and space AI compute (new_project, launch, date_change, status_change) with companies and source URLs. Needs a paid Orbitwren key (Alerts plan $5/month).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | – | Company name (part of it) |
| limit | integer | – | Rows (1-500) |
| since | string | – | Only alerts on or after this date (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| type | string | – | Alert types, comma separated: new_project, launch, date_change, status_change, update |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
orbital_compute_projects Orbital compute projects ~215
Orbital data centers and space AI compute projects (data centers in space, AI chips in orbit, FCC constellation filings): company, partners, hardware in orbit, launch date, vehicle, status, scale, publicly stated funding, NORAD IDs and source URLs. Use for questions like "who is building orbital data centers?" or "are there data centers in space?". Filter by company, status, category or text.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Text in the category, e.g. satellite, constellation filing, hardware platform |
| company | string | – | Company or partner name (part of it), e.g. starcloud, google |
| inOrbit | boolean | – | Only projects with hardware in orbit now |
| limit | integer | – | Rows (1-100) |
| q | string | – | Free text over company, project, hardware and summary, e.g. TPU or H100 |
| status | string | – | One of: scheduled, in orbit, deployed, flown, planned, filed, announced, development |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
tracker_changes Tracker change log ~58
Day-to-day changes: project status, launch dates, NORAD IDs, tracked launch NET/status.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Rows (1-200) |
| since | string | – | Only changes on or after this date (YYYY-MM-DD) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
upcoming_launches Upcoming launches ~192
Upcoming orbital launches from The Space Devs Launch Library 2 with rideshare and orbital-compute flags; filter by days ahead, rideshare, compute, provider, country or text.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| compute | boolean | – | Only launches carrying a tracked orbital-compute project or mentioning data centres/TPUs/GPUs |
| country | string | – | Pad country, ISO 3166 alpha-3, e.g. USA, CHN, NZL |
| days | integer | – | Look ahead N days (1-730) |
| limit | integer | – | Rows (1-100) |
| provider | string | – | Launch provider (part of the name), e.g. SpaceX, Rocket Lab |
| q | string | – | Free text over launch name, mission and rocket |
| rideshare | boolean | – | true = only rideshare missions (Transporter, Bandwagon ...), false = exclude them |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Orbitwren MCP server?
Orbitwren is a hosted endpoint at https://orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com
claude mcp add --transport http dev-workers-cybermax-tools-cybermax-orbitwren 'https://orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry'
What is the Orbitwren MCP server?
Orbitwren is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.workers.cybermax-tools.cybermax/orbitwren. Orbital data center & space AI compute tracker MCP: projects, launches, orbits, alerts. 100 free/day. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://orbitwren.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry).
Is the Orbitwren MCP server safe to use?
Orbitwren scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Orbitwren MCP server expose?
Orbitwren exposes 6 tools: orbital_compute_projects, next_compute_launch, upcoming_launches, compute_satellite_orbits, orbital_compute_alerts, tracker_changes. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 719 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Orbitwren MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Orbitwren without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Orbitwren MCP server still maintained?
Orbitwren is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.