Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot

REMOTE · JUPIE202020.PYTHONANYWHERE.COM

Find services, draft exact terms and review agreements. Public tools; private account trials.

71 Trust /100

Last scanned (14 hours ago)

Scores higher than 57% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1668 tokens (~185/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management17
  • Stability observed for 5 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +3
    • Tool “aap_public_listing_search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “covenant_contract__compare” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “covenant_contract__draft” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “covenant_contract__inspect” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “covenant_contract__render” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “covenant_review__authority” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “covenant_review__evidence” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “covenant_review__review” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 111 → 185 ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 12% → 100% ▲ functional
    • Schema quality: fair → good functional
    • “aap_public_listing_search” reworded the description of “category” cosmetic
    • “aap_public_listing_search” reworded the description of “limit” cosmetic
    • “aap_public_listing_search” reworded the description of “offset” cosmetic
    • “aap_public_listing_search” reworded the description of “query” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__compare” reworded the description of “after” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__compare” reworded the description of “before” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__draft” reworded the description of “clauses” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__draft” reworded the description of “conditions” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__draft” reworded the description of “dispute” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__draft” reworded the description of “extensions” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__draft” reworded the description of “parties” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__draft” reworded the description of “settlement” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__draft” reworded the description of “title” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__inspect” reworded the description of “body” cosmetic
    • “covenant_contract__render” reworded the description of “body” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “amount” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “archetype” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “buyer” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “compact” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “context” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “description” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “payment_asset” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “seller” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “settlement” cosmetic
    • “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” reworded the description of “terms” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__authority” reworded the description of “agreements” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__authority” reworded the description of “expected_heads” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__authority” reworded the description of “grants” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__authority” reworded the description of “group” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__authority” reworded the description of “policies” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__evidence” reworded the description of “agreement_ids” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__evidence” reworded the description of “items” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__review” reworded the description of “case” cosmetic
    • “covenant_review__review” reworded the description of “expected_id” cosmetic
    • Tool “aap_public_listing_search” changed its title: Find public services cosmetic
    • Tool “covenant_contract__compare” changed its title: Compare changed terms cosmetic
    • Tool “covenant_contract__draft” changed its title: Draft work terms cosmetic
    • Tool “covenant_contract__inspect” changed its title: Inspect contract terms cosmetic
    • Tool “covenant_contract__render” changed its title: Read contract terms cosmetic
    • Tool “covenant_marketplace__quick_trade” changed its title: Prepare a service offer cosmetic
    • Tool “covenant_review__authority” changed its title: Check declared authority cosmetic
    • Tool “covenant_review__evidence” changed its title: Check supplied proofs cosmetic
    • Tool “covenant_review__review” changed its title: Review a work record cosmetic
  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 31 Oct 26 66

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.pythonanywhere.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 21 Sept 2026 20 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 5f42705e4274c8eb2b24a997abb8ecba729
SANs: *.pythonanywhere.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
pythonanywhere.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy no-referrer

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 302 https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/mcp
MCP tools · 9 exposed · ~1,592 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
aap_public_listing_search ~161

Find currently searchable service listings in this shared marketplace. Search this shared marketplace for current active INDEXED public listings. Only explicitly published fields are returned; PRIVATE and UNLISTED records are excluded, including from totals. Ranking matches the existing public listing API. Price, inventory, identity, performance and payment are not verified. No account, signing, publication or provider call.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional category filter; it does not broaden access to unlisted or private records.
limitinteger–Maximum public results to return in this page; use the advertised bound.
offsetinteger–Zero-based offset into the current public result page.
querystring–Optional words describing the service needed; searches only current public listings.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

covenant_contract__compare ~91

Compare two contract bodies and show the changes that need fresh approval. Draft arbitrary clauses, preserve amendment ancestry, compare exact changes, and render an escaped HTML draft. Never supplies assent. Selected action: compare.

NameTypeReqDescription
afterobjectyesThe complete proposed replacement raw contract body; changed terms need fresh assent.
beforeobjectyesThe complete original raw contract body; keep its exact bytes and identifier.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

covenant_contract__draft ~176

Draft an agreement from the exact parties, clauses, conditions and dispute terms you supply. Draft arbitrary clauses, preserve amendment ancestry, compare exact changes, and render an escaped HTML draft. Never supplies assent. Selected action: draft.

NameTypeReqDescription
clausesarrayyesThe exact obligations and terms to include in the unsigned draft.
conditionsarray–Optional exact conditions governing the proposed obligations.
disputeobject–Optional proposed review or dispute procedure; no arbitrator is appointed.
extensionsobject–Optional exact additional terms or adopted profile references supplied by the caller.
partiesarrayyesThe declared parties and roles for this draft; no assent is inferred.
settlementobject–Optional proposed payment or settlement terms; no payment occurs.
titlestringyesA short name for the proposed agreement.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

covenant_contract__inspect ~102

Inspect one exact contract body and return its identifier and structure. Covenant public API and MCP reference: https://covenant-common.github.io/covenant-docs/docs/API_MCP.html. Draft arbitrary clauses, preserve amendment ancestry, compare exact changes, and render an escaped HTML draft. Never supplies assent. Selected action: inspect.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodyobjectyesThe raw contract body from the draft response; supply the contract body rather than the complete response wrapper.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

covenant_contract__render ~98

Render one exact contract body as readable HTML without changing its terms. Covenant public API and MCP reference: https://covenant-common.github.io/covenant-docs/docs/API_MCP.html. Draft arbitrary clauses, preserve amendment ancestry, compare exact changes, and render an escaped HTML draft. Never supplies assent. Selected action: render.

NameTypeReqDescription
bodyobjectyesThe raw contract body to display; a readable copy does not create assent.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

covenant_marketplace__quick_trade ~353

Prepare an unsigned service offer with a buyer, seller, price and optional deal structure. Create a general market, listing or reusable transaction archetype. quick_trade prepares the complete simple agreement in one call. Every record carries seven question dimensions. Credit/escrow/custom terms require adopted execution; no funds or inventory are inferred. Selected action: quick_trade.

NameTypeReqDescription
amountintegeryesInteger price in the payment asset's exact stated unit. For USD cents, 25 dollars is 2500 cents; never infer a currency conversion.
archetypeobject–Optional exact reusable deal structure supplied by the caller; preparation does not execute it.
buyerstringyesThe proposed buyer role and identifier; a role label does not prove authority.
compactboolean–Return the supported compact view; retain the complete exact packet when approving.
contextstringyesCaller-chosen exact context for this unsigned proposal.
descriptionstringyesThe work or resource being offered, including the intended deliverable.
payment_assetobjectyesThe exact namespace, identifier and unit of the proposed payment asset. Named resource; adapter and transfer_terms default to null and {}. Naming never proves title, custody or transfer.
sellerstringyesThe proposed seller role and identifier; a label does not verify the supplier.
settlementobject–Optional proposed settlement terms; no rail is connected or payment sent. Optional explicit settlement terms. A pinned archetype settlement may be repeated exactly, but cannot be silently replaced.
termsobject–Optional exact additional terms to preserve in this unsigned offer. Optional exact inspection, correction, return or other terms adopted in this first offer.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

covenant_review__authority ~221

Inspect supplied role summaries and any supported owner-local authority evidence. Inspect caller-supplied role summaries and any supported local authority evidence. Each agreements row has exactly id, kind and parties (role to direct Ed25519 public key). Do not pass a contract-draft wrapper. Read https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/review-reference.json for examples. A declared role is not verified permission; this does not authorize signing, payment or execution.

NameTypeReqDescription
agreementsarrayyesCaller-declared role summaries. Each row has exactly id, kind and parties; parties maps role names to supported public verification keys. These are not signed contract wrappers.
expected_headsarray–Optional retained sorted causal heads for the group review.
grantsarray–Optional exact grant records for owner-local access review; do not provide private keys or credentials.
groupstring–Optional exact group reference; it does not appoint a controller or grant authority.
policiesarray–Optional exact policy records; declarations are separate from installed authority.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

covenant_review__evidence ~129

Check supplied proof envelopes against the supported installed verifiers and exact expectations. Check supplied proof envelopes with the supported installed verifiers. Read https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/review-reference.json for item fields. Empty input reports no proofs supplied. A verified proof covers its exact statement and assumptions, not outside truth or execution permission.

NameTypeReqDescription
agreement_idsarrayyesExact agreement identifiers already verified separately; a supplied identifier alone does not prove assent.
itemsarrayyesSupplied proof envelopes and exact verifier/context/statement expectations. Empty input means no proofs were supplied.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

covenant_review__review ~261

Review a raw coordination case, its supplied agreements, approvals and remaining duties. Review an exact coordination case, its supplied approvals and remaining obligations. Read https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/review-reference.json for the case format and a complete empty example. A contract draft is not a verified agreement. Case builders such as start/case/spec are installed SDK helpers, not tools on this public endpoint. No signing or execution.

NameTypeReqDescription
caseobjectyesA raw coordination case with version, title and agreements. A contract draft or prior review report is not a case. See the service review-reference.json. Exact coordination case. Use start or case to…
expected_idstring–Optional retained exact case SHA256 identifier. A mismatch refuses; never replace a trusted pin merely to pass.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot MCP server?

Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot is a hosted endpoint at https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http covenant-common-covenant-aap 'https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot MCP server?

Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.covenant-common/covenant-aap. Find services, draft exact terms and review agreements. Public tools; private account trials. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://jupie202020.pythonanywhere.com/mcp).

Is the Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot MCP server safe to use?

Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot MCP server expose?

Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot exposes 9 tools: covenant_marketplace__quick_trade, covenant_contract__draft, covenant_contract__inspect, covenant_contract__compare, covenant_contract__render, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,592 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot MCP server still maintained?

Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Covenant AAP - hosted developer pilot, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.