Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Weekend Gap Board

REMOTE · WEEKEND-GAP-BOARD.PAGES.DEV

Tokenized-stock weekend gaps vs Friday close, issuer dispersion, HIP-3 perps, cross-venue funding

71 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 57% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 267 tokens (~267/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
  • Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • Tool “get_weekend_board” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 235 → 267 ▼ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 1 Nov 26 70

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://weekend-gap-board.pages.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=weekend-gap-board.pages.dev CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 1 Nov 2026 30 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 5f62fbf265c78b9f9d9f02ef6c7f8a1fafe
SANs: *.weekend-gap-board.pages.dev, weekend-gap-board.pages.dev
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of weekend-gap-board.pages.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. DS published 60074 8 Verified
pages.dev. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://weekend-gap-board.pages.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://weekend-gap-board.pages.dev/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://weekend-gap-board.pages.dev/mcp
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~222 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_weekend_board ~222

Latest snapshot of (1) the weekend gap of tokenized US stocks vs a Fri 16:00 ET reference (Hyperliquid oracle, or token last-hour avg; each row's reference_source says which; not the official close), as a volume-weighted consensus across issuers (Ondo, xStocks, bStocks, Remora, Robinhood, Coinbase...) with cross-issuer dispersion and the matching Hyperliquid HIP-3 stock-perp gap; and (2) cross-venue funding APR for the same stock perps. All gaps in basis points vs that Fri 16:00 ET reference. Read-only, free, no key. Thin weekend liquidity; not advice.

NameTypeReqDescription
include_breakdownboolean–Include per-issuer / per-venue rows (default true).
limitinteger–Max rows per table (default: all rows).
sectionstring–Which table to return (default all).
tickerstring–Optional US ticker filter, e.g. NVDA. Case-insensitive.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Weekend Gap Board MCP server?

Weekend Gap Board is a hosted endpoint at https://weekend-gap-board.pages.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · weekend-gap-board.pages.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-pages-weekend-gap-board-weekend-gap-board 'https://weekend-gap-board.pages.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Weekend Gap Board MCP server?

Weekend Gap Board is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.pages.weekend-gap-board/weekend-gap-board. Tokenized-stock weekend gaps vs Friday close, issuer dispersion, HIP-3 perps, cross-venue funding. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://weekend-gap-board.pages.dev/mcp).

Is the Weekend Gap Board MCP server safe to use?

Weekend Gap Board scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Weekend Gap Board MCP server expose?

Weekend Gap Board exposes 1 tool: get_weekend_board. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 222 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Weekend Gap Board MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Weekend Gap Board without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Weekend Gap Board MCP server still maintained?

Weekend Gap Board is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Weekend Gap Board MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Weekend Gap Board, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.