Tradoshi rankings and research
REMOTE · TRADOSHI.COM
2027 rankings of trading schools and prop firms, every criterion sourced, plus market data
Available components
Last scanned (11 hours ago)
Scores higher than 58% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 717 tokens (~79/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage78
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 35% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “get_methodology” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_rankings” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Server version: 1.3.0 → 1.3.1 functional
- 1 Nov 26 +1
- Server version: 1.2.0 → 1.3.0 functional
- 31 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Server version: 1.1.0 → 1.2.0 functional
- 30 Oct 26 69
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://tradoshi.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=tradoshi.com | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 1 Nov 2026 | 30 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 57b378abe4556a117e6c296eec0b7ad04c6 |
| SANs: tradoshi.com, www.tradoshi.com | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of tradoshi.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| tradoshi.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://tradoshi.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://tradoshi.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://tradoshi.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare Compare two schools or two prop firms ~50
Side by side ratings of two trading schools or two prop firms of the Tradoshi 2027 rankings.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | string | yes | – |
| b | string | yes | – |
| type | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_market_figures Trading journal market figures ~36
Size of the trading journal market, paying subscribers, leader's share and retained growth rate, from the Tradoshi Observatory study.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_methodology How the rankings are scored ~49
Pillars, weights and criteria of the Tradoshi 2027 ranking of trading and investing schools or of prop firms, with the link to the full methodology.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| type | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_prop_firm A prop firm's rating ~88
The Tradoshi 2027 rating of a prop firm: score out of 100, international and market ranks, pillars, trading platforms, rated programme and price of a $100,000 account, regulator warnings, and each criterion with its evidence, source URL and the date it was read.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | Prop firm slug, from search_entities or get_rankings |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_rankings A ranking ~150
A page of the Tradoshi 2027 ranking of trading and investing schools (filter by country or continent) or prop firms (filter by market: futures, forex-cfd, crypto, stocks, by trading platform: ctrader, mt5, match-trader, tradovate…, or by country).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| continent | string | – | – |
| country | string | – | ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| market | string | – | – |
| offset | integer | – | – |
| platform | string | – | Prop firms only: trading platform offered, for example ctrader, mt5, match-trader |
| type | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_recent_changes Latest changes ~85
Dated changes: new features of the Tradoshi trading journal (product changelog) and changes to prop firm ratings in the Tradoshi 2027 ranking (score, rank and each criterion before and after).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| since | string | – | Only changes on or after this date, YYYY-MM-DD |
| type | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_school A trading school's rating ~75
The Tradoshi 2027 rating of a trading school: score out of 100, international, continental and national ranks, pillars, rated programme, regulator warnings, and each criterion with its evidence, source URL and the date it was read.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | School slug, from search_entities or get_rankings |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_tradoshi_facts Official facts about Tradoshi ~62
The official facts about Tradoshi, the trading journal publishing these rankings: legal entity and company number, public launch date, platforms, languages, number of supported brokers, plans and prices, trial, payment methods, with the date they were checked.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_entities Find a school or a prop firm ~57
Find trading schools and prop firms by name in the Tradoshi 2027 rankings. Returns slugs to use with get_school or get_prop_firm.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | string | yes | Part of the name, at least 2 characters |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Tradoshi rankings and research MCP server?
Tradoshi rankings and research is a hosted endpoint at https://tradoshi.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · tradoshi.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-tradoshi-rankings 'https://tradoshi.com/mcp'
What is the Tradoshi rankings and research MCP server?
Tradoshi rankings and research is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.tradoshi/rankings. 2027 rankings of trading schools and prop firms, every criterion sourced, plus market data. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://tradoshi.com/mcp).
Is the Tradoshi rankings and research MCP server safe to use?
Tradoshi rankings and research scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Tradoshi rankings and research MCP server expose?
Tradoshi rankings and research exposes 9 tools: search_entities, get_school, get_prop_firm, compare, get_rankings, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 652 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Tradoshi rankings and research MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Tradoshi rankings and research without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Tradoshi rankings and research MCP server still maintained?
Tradoshi rankings and research is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Tradoshi rankings and research MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Tradoshi rankings and research, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.