# Starlecta influencer tools (remote · starlecta.com)

Instagram influencer lookup, compare, AI search, account check, Trend Cloud, Brand of the Day.

- Trust score: 75/100 (medium)
- Change this week: +5
- Registry status: active
- Liveness: live
- Owner verified: no
- Last scored: 2026-11-06

## Components

- remote · `starlecta.com`: 75/100 (this document), [markdown](https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-starlecta-influencer-tools/starlecta.md), [page](https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-starlecta-influencer-tools/starlecta)

## Channel facts

- Endpoint: `https://starlecta.com/mcp`
- Transports: `streamable-http`
- Auth: `none`
- Version: `1.1.0`

## Trust breakdown

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. Scores are 0–100 per category. Scoring method: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring (what has changed: https://verifymcp.io/docs/scoring/changelog)

Scored 2026-11-06.

- **Endpoint Security**: 83/100
  - The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key.
  - No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation.
  - HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path.
  - The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present.
  - DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root.
- **Transport & Reachability**: 100/100
  - Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake.
- **Schema Quality & AI Usability**: 71/100
  - AI-judged instruction clarity (good).
  - Tool/resource definitions use about 748 tokens (~106/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.
  - Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples.
- **Stability & Change Management**: 23/100
  - Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.
- **Tool Coverage**: 94/100
  - 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).
  - 82% of tool parameters carry a description.
- **Tool Safety**: 100/100
  - No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.
  - We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.
  - An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.
- **Capabilities**: 60/100
  - Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28.

## Install

### How do I install the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server?

Starlecta influencer tools is a hosted endpoint at https://starlecta.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

### Claude

```bash
claude mcp add --transport http com-starlecta-influencer-tools 'https://starlecta.com/mcp'
```

### Cursor

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-starlecta-influencer-tools": {
      "url": "https://starlecta.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### VS Code

```json
{
  "servers": {
    "com-starlecta-influencer-tools": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://starlecta.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Codex

```toml
[mcp_servers.com-starlecta-influencer-tools]
url = "https://starlecta.com/mcp"
```

### opencode

```json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-starlecta-influencer-tools": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://starlecta.com/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
```

### OpenClaw

```bash
openclaw mcp add com-starlecta-influencer-tools --url 'https://starlecta.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
```

### Hermes

```yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-starlecta-influencer-tools:
    url: "https://starlecta.com/mcp"
```

### Netclaw

```json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "com-starlecta-influencer-tools": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://starlecta.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

### Vellum

```bash
assistant mcp add com-starlecta-influencer-tools -t streamable-http -u 'https://starlecta.com/mcp'
```

### Other

```json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-starlecta-influencer-tools": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://starlecta.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}
```

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

## Changelog

Every change recorded for this component, newest first. Days that predate change tracking, or that we cannot explain, say so: "we were watching and nothing happened" and "we were not watching" are different claims.

### 2026-11-06 (score 75, 0)

- [functional] We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server

### 2026-11-05 (score 75, +1)

- [functional improvement] Tool coverage: 55% → 82%
- [cosmetic] “search_influencers” reworded the description of “category”
- [cosmetic] “search_influencers” reworded the description of “er_measured”
- [cosmetic] “search_influencers” reworded the description of “followers_max”
- [cosmetic] “search_influencers” reworded the description of “followers_min”

### 2026-11-04 (score 74, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-03 (score 73, 0)

- [security] Tool “ai_search_influencers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads

### 2026-11-02 (score 73, +1)

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

### 2026-11-01 (score 72, +1)

- [security] The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads
- [security] Tool “ai_search_influencers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [security] Tool “audit_influencer” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [security] Tool “lookup_influencer” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [functional regression] Schema quality: 90 → 106
- [functional regression] Schema quality: 90 → 103
- [functional improvement] Tool coverage: 50% → 55%
- [functional] Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0
- [functional] New tool “brand_of_the_day”
- [cosmetic] Tool “audit_influencer” changed its title: Instagram account check → Global Account Check

### 2026-10-31 (score 71, +1)

- [security] Tool “ai_search_influencers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads
- [functional regression] Schema quality: 414 → 543
- [functional improvement] Tool coverage: 44% → 50%
- [functional improvement] Stability: unverified → 0.03
- [functional] New tool “audit_influencer”

### 2026-10-30 (score 70)

First indexed and scored.

## MCP tools (7)

### `lookup_influencer` (~62 tokens)

Look up an influencer

Public card of one Instagram influencer Starlecta tracks every day: tier, category, rounded followers and the measured engagement rate with its date. Status is open, tracked or not_listed.

Input parameters:

- `handle` (string, required): Instagram handle, with or without @

### `compare_influencers` (~59 tokens)

Compare two influencers

Two influencers side by side on the same method and dates: followers, engagement rate and an engagement band.

Input parameters:

- `a` (string, required): Instagram handle, with or without @
- `b` (string, required): Instagram handle, with or without @

### `search_influencers` (~119 tokens)

Search influencers by filters

Count of matching influencers and up to two open cards. Filters: category code, tier (nano, micro, macro, mega), follower bounds, measured engagement only.

Input parameters:

- `category` (string): Category code: one of the listed values
- `er_measured` (boolean): Only influencers whose engagement rate is measured
- `followers_max` (integer): Upper follower bound: one of the listed values
- `followers_min` (integer): Lower follower bound: one of the listed values; below followers_max
- `tier` (string)

### `ai_search_influencers` (~138 tokens)

AI search for influencers

One sentence in Turkish or English (2 to 200 characters), read as filters and niche words; the best candidates are then scored for relevance (detailed mode, about 30 seconds). Returns the count and up to two strong matches as open cards, each with the niches that matched (cards are ordered by relevance, then measured engagement, then followers; no score is returned); sometimes one or none. The ranking field tells how they were chosen. An optional safety object (flagged true, reason filtered or sensitive_condition) says details were withheld for privacy or safety; it never repeats the words.

Input parameters:

- `sentence` (string, required)

### `trend_cloud` (~45 tokens)

Trend Cloud

What influencers share in the last 7 days: rising hashtags with post counts, and the most shared products, platforms and brands with share counts. Aggregate counts only; no key needed.

### `audit_influencer` (~99 tokens)

Global Account Check

Reads one public Instagram account live and returns dated, counted metrics: followers, engagement rate over the latest items with n, average likes and comments, median Reel plays, posting frequency, Stories seen now, last post. Public accounts with 10,000+ followers. Not a score. Limited daily. Accounts Starlecta tracks every day show more in lookup_influencer.

Input parameters:

- `handle` (string, required): Instagram handle, with or without @

### `brand_of_the_day` (~119 tokens)

Brand of the Day

The brand or shopping platform of the day on Instagram in Turkey: last week's creators and contents against the week before, share of the conversation against its rivals, the head-to-head with rivals (Reel plays, likes and comments, average creator quality) and who it reached (gender, age, city, two top interests). Aggregate figures only; no creator is named. Optional day (YYYY-MM-DD) returns an earlier day. No key needed.

Input parameters:

- `day` (string): A day, YYYY-MM-DD; the latest day when omitted

## Diagnostics

Captured diagnostic sections: TLS, DNSSEC, Authorisation, Transports. The full working is on the page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-starlecta-influencer-tools/starlecta#diagnostics

## Score history

- 2026-11-06: 75
- 2026-11-05: 75
- 2026-11-04: 74
- 2026-11-03: 73
- 2026-11-02: 73
- 2026-11-01: 72
- 2026-10-31: 71
- 2026-10-30: 70

## Common questions

### What is the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server?

Starlecta influencer tools is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.starlecta/influencer-tools. Instagram influencer lookup, compare, AI search, account check, Trend Cloud, Brand of the Day. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://starlecta.com/mcp).

### Is the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server safe to use?

Starlecta influencer tools scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

### What tools does the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server expose?

Starlecta influencer tools exposes 7 tools: lookup_influencer, compare_influencers, search_influencers, ai_search_influencers, trend_cloud, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 641 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

### Does the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Starlecta influencer tools without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

### Is the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server still maintained?

Starlecta influencer tools is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

### What did VerifyMCP test on the Starlecta influencer tools MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Starlecta influencer tools, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.

## Links

- Remote endpoint: https://starlecta.com/mcp
- Repository: https://github.com/Starlecta/starlecta-examples
- Website: https://starlecta.com/en/mcp
- Changelog RSS feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-starlecta-influencer-tools/starlecta.xml
- Changelog JSON feed: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-starlecta-influencer-tools/starlecta/changelog.json
- Trust report (JSON): https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-starlecta-influencer-tools/starlecta.json
- HTML version of this page: https://verifymcp.io/servers/com-starlecta-influencer-tools/starlecta