Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Signal by StackEnhance

REMOTE · MCP.STACKENHANCE.COM

How often 750+ e-commerce brands send marketing emails: counts, send dates, recent subject lines.

+3 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1054 tokens (~351/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
  • Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “get_brand_summary” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “get_brand_email_frequency” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.stackenhance.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mcp.stackenhance.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 9 Oct 2026 7 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 524ed5fb8fa01bce9680c4c1151647eb2ac
SANs: mcp.stackenhance.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of mcp.stackenhance.com. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
stackenhance.com. present 940 13 Verified
mcp.stackenhance.com. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.stackenhance.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.stackenhance.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://mcp.stackenhance.com/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~859 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
find_brands ~216

Ecommerce brands StackEnhance Signal tracks in one market, ranked by current email frequency (average marketing emails per week over the last 90 days), optionally within a category such as "Fashion & Apparel" or "Home & Interior". Use for questions like "Which brands email most frequently in Swedish ecommerce?" or to find a brand when the user names a kind of brand ("a Swedish fashion brand"). Rankings are available for SE, NO, DK, FI and DE. Brands with too little observed data are left out of rankings. Returns brand names, categories and emails per week only. Each brand has a details_url to cite.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional category, e.g. "Fashion & Apparel", "Home & Interior", "Beauty & Cosmetics", "Sports & Outdoor".
limitinteger–How many brands to return (1-10, default 10).
marketstringyesCountry as a two-letter code (SE, NO, DK, FI or DE) or its name ("Sweden").
NameTypeReqDescription
brandsarrayyes–
brands_trackedintegeryes–
categorystring|nullyes–
marketstringyes–
window_daysintegeryes–

No examples provided.

get_brand_email_frequency ~431

How many marketing emails a brand sent in a calendar period, and when, as observed by StackEnhance Signal (ecommerce brands, mostly in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland and Germany). Use for questions like "How many emails did Newport send in August 2026?", "What did Newport send last week?" or "What has X sent recently?". Without a market, a brand tracked in several countries gets one result per market. Resolve relative dates yourself to YYYY-MM-DD: "last week" is the previous Monday–Sunday, "last month" the previous calendar month, "recently" the last 14 days. Dates are the brand's local calendar dates. The period must start within the last six months (older history is in a Signal account) and may span up to two years. Returns the count; for periods of up to 31 days also the date of each send; and at most two subject lines, only ones already shown on the brand's public StackEnhance page and sent in the period. Every listed send was captured in full; a send without a quoted subject is listed in sends_with_subject_in_signal because its subject is withheld by that limit, not missing. Counts are de-duplicated marketing sends (welcome, birthday and transactional emails excluded). There is no open, click or revenue data. Full campaigns, other subject lines, offers, products and creative analysis are not available through this tool. Cite each result's details_url as the source and as where the full campaigns are.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringyesBrand name as the user wrote it, e.g. "Newport" or "IKEA". A domain such as newport.se also works.
fromstringyesFirst day of the period, YYYY-MM-DD.
marketstring–Country of one storefront as a two-letter code (SE, NO, DK, FI, DE) or its name ("Sweden"). Omit it to get every market the brand is tracked in.
tostringyesLast day of the period, inclusive, YYYY-MM-DD.
NameTypeReqDescription
resultsarrayyes–
unavailablearray––

No examples provided.

get_brand_summary ~212

A brand's email-marketing profile as observed by StackEnhance Signal: market, category, the date Signal first observed it, marketing emails observed in the last 6 months, current frequency (average emails per week over the last 90 days) and the date of the latest observed campaign. Use for questions like "How often does Newport email customers?" or "Is IKEA still sending newsletters?". Without a market, a brand tracked in several countries gets one summary per market. Returns aggregates only — no campaign list, subject lines, offers or creative analysis. Cite each result's details_url as the source.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringyesBrand name as the user wrote it, e.g. "Newport" or "IKEA". A domain such as newport.se also works.
marketstring–Country of one storefront as a two-letter code (SE, NO, DK, FI, DE) or its name ("Sweden"). Omit it to get every market the brand is tracked in.
NameTypeReqDescription
resultsarrayyes–
unavailablearray––

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Signal by StackEnhance MCP server?

Signal by StackEnhance is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.stackenhance.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.stackenhance.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-stackenhance-signal 'https://mcp.stackenhance.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Signal by StackEnhance MCP server?

Signal by StackEnhance is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.stackenhance/signal. How often 750+ e-commerce brands send marketing emails: counts, send dates, recent subject lines. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.stackenhance.com/mcp).

Is the Signal by StackEnhance MCP server safe to use?

Signal by StackEnhance scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Signal by StackEnhance MCP server expose?

Signal by StackEnhance exposes 3 tools: get_brand_email_frequency, get_brand_summary, find_brands. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 859 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Signal by StackEnhance MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Signal by StackEnhance without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Signal by StackEnhance MCP server still maintained?

Signal by StackEnhance is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.