Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Unite Research

REMOTE · RESEARCH.UNITEBR.COM

Read published Brazil Black Friday creative benchmarks, chart data and citations.

+3 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (12 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 290 tokens (~72/item across 4 items; 3 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
  • Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
  • Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://research.unitebr.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=research.unitebr.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 7 Oct 2026 5 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 587864655b66f9cb580713acad29e7eed0c
SANs: research.unitebr.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of research.unitebr.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
unitebr.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://research.unitebr.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://research.unitebr.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://research.unitebr.com/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~272 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_chart_data ~109

Retrieve a published chart with its values, units, comparison, period, population, source and methodology. Values keep their Portuguese display formatting. Follow next_cursor for remaining rows.

NameTypeReqDescription
chart_idstringyesA chart_id returned by list_charts.
cursorstring–Opaque next_cursor from the previous response.
limitinteger–Maximum items per page, from 1 to 50.
offsetinteger–Legacy zero-based offset. Use either cursor or offset.
NameTypeReqDescription
okbooleanyes–

No examples provided.

get_citation ~53

Retrieve source, canonical URL, dates, methodology, interpretation limits and reuse terms. Optionally include a chart-specific comparison, period and population.

NameTypeReqDescription
chart_idstring–A chart_id returned by list_charts.
NameTypeReqDescription
okbooleanyes–

No examples provided.

list_charts ~110

Find published Black Friday Brazil research charts by topic. Returns chart IDs, column labels, comparisons, periods and population. Use get_chart_data to retrieve the values.

NameTypeReqDescription
cursorstring–Opaque next_cursor from the previous response.
limitinteger–Maximum items per page, from 1 to 50.
offsetinteger–Legacy zero-based offset. Use either cursor or offset.
querystring–Topic such as CPM, oferta, conversão or thumbstop.
NameTypeReqDescription
okbooleanyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Unite Research MCP server?

Unite Research is a hosted endpoint at https://research.unitebr.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · research.unitebr.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-unitebr-research-benchmark 'https://research.unitebr.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Unite Research MCP server?

Unite Research is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.unitebr.research/benchmark. Read published Brazil Black Friday creative benchmarks, chart data and citations. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://research.unitebr.com/mcp).

Is the Unite Research MCP server safe to use?

Unite Research scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Unite Research MCP server expose?

Unite Research exposes 3 tools: list_charts, get_chart_data, get_citation. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 272 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Unite Research MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Unite Research without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Unite Research MCP server still maintained?

Unite Research is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.