Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists
REMOTE · REALCRYPTOSIGNALS.COM
Check sites and firms against regulator scam warning lists: SEC, CFTC, AMF, FSMA, BaFin, AFM, CBI
Available components
Last scanned (19 hours ago)
Scores higher than 58% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.
Category Security
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 540 tokens (~108/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management3
- Stability observed for 1 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage76
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 29% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 18 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 17 Oct 26 68
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://realcryptosignals.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=realcryptosignals.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 23 Sept 2026 | 22 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 447e32b8779661960ef320abfd25f49d |
| SANs: realcryptosignals.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of realcryptosignals.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| realcryptosignals.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://realcryptosignals.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://realcryptosignals.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://realcryptosignals.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_name Check a company or brand name against regulator warning lists ~75
Search the compiled regulator warning lists for a firm, brand or platform name (legal suffixes such as Ltd or LLC are ignored). Returns up to `limit` closest entries with the regulators that warned about them and the official notice URLs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| name | string | yes | Company, brand or platform name. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_website Check a website against regulator warning lists ~89
Look up a website or URL (for example 'example-trade.com' or 'https://app.example-trade.com/login') in the official regulator warning lists compiled by Real Crypto Signals. Returns every matching warning with the regulator, country, date and official notice URL. An empty result does not mean the site is safe.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | Website, domain or full URL to check. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
how_to_report Where to report a crypto or investment scam ~70
Official places to report a crypto or investment scam in a given country (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code, for example US, GB, AU, CA, DE, FR, ES, IT, IN, SG). Returns agencies with their official URLs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
latest_warnings Latest regulator warnings ~76
The newest warnings added to the compiled lists, newest first. Optionally filter by regulator code (from list_sources) or by ISO country code of the regulator (for example GB, US, FR, ES, IT, SG).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| regulator | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_sources Warning lists included ~33
Which official warning lists are included, how many entries each one contributed, the official list URL and when it was last fetched.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists MCP server?
Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists is a hosted endpoint at https://realcryptosignals.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · realcryptosignals.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-realcryptosignals-scam-warnings 'https://realcryptosignals.com/mcp'
What is the Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists MCP server?
Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.realcryptosignals/scam-warnings. Check sites and firms against regulator scam warning lists: SEC, CFTC, AMF, FSMA, BaFin, AFM, CBI. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://realcryptosignals.com/mcp).
Is the Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists MCP server safe to use?
Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists scores 68 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists MCP server expose?
Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists exposes 5 tools: check_website, check_name, latest_warnings, list_sources, how_to_report. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 343 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists MCP server still maintained?
Real Crypto Signals: crypto scam warning lists is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.