com.radveo/radveo

REMOTE · RADVEO.COM · SCANNED AUG 3

Checks if AI assistants name a local business. Free shareable report, honest fixes, no guarantees.

Available components

+2 this week 67 67 Trust /100

Trust breakdown (6 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →

Endpoint Security63

The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 2 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail

Transport & Reachability100

Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass

Schema Quality & AI Usability76

AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 308 tokens (~154/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail

Stability & Change Management27

Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial

Tool Coverage100

100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass

Capabilities60

Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail

Install

Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.

remote · radveo.com

Claude Codex opencode OpenClaw Hermes Other

# add to Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http com-radveo-radveo https://radveo.com/api/mcp

# ~/.codex/config.toml

[mcp_servers.com-radveo-radveo]
url = "https://radveo.com/api/mcp"

// opencode.json

{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-radveo-radveo": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://radveo.com/api/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}

# add to OpenClaw

openclaw mcp add com-radveo-radveo --url https://radveo.com/api/mcp --transport streamable-http

# ~/.hermes/config.yaml

mcp_servers:
  com-radveo-radveo:
    url: "https://radveo.com/api/mcp"

// mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-radveo-radveo": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://radveo.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

2 Aug 26 +1

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
31 Jul 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
30 Jul 26 −2
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
29 Jul 26 +1

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
28 Jul 26 +1

No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
27 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
26 Jul 26 65

First indexed and scored.

Show 6 earlier entries Hide earlier entries

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 3 Aug 2026 · Probed https://radveo.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject	Issuer	Valid from	Valid until	Key	Signature	Serial
CN=radveo.com	CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US	21 Jun 2026	19 Sept 2026	RSA 2048	SHA256-RSA	5c52afcfae84cae1795c70f0e121519a8d3
SANs: radveo.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA)	CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US	3 Sept 2025	2 Sept 2028	RSA 2048	SHA256-RSA	4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA)	CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US	13 May 2026	2 Sept 2032	RSA 4096	SHA256-RSA	f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of radveo.com. — Not signed

Zone	DS	Keys	Algorithms	Outcome
.	trust_anchor	20326, 38696	8, 8	Verified
com.	present	19718	13	Verified
radveo.com.	absent			Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation

Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result	No authorisation required
HTTP status	200

Header	Value
strict-transport-security	max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-content-type-options	nosniff
x-frame-options	DENY
referrer-policy	strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy	camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=(), payment=(self)

Transports 2 probes

Transport	URL	Outcome	Status	Location
streamable-http	https://radveo.com/api/mcp	Verified	200
http (plaintext)	http://radveo.com/api/mcp	HTTPS enforced	308	https://radveo.com/api/mcp

MCP tools — 2 exposed · ~219 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.

Tool Tokens

check_ai_visibility ~158

Check whether a local business currently appears when people ask AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI) to recommend a business in its category — and get a free, shareable Radveo report with the exact fixes to improve its odds of being named. Honest answer-engine optimization: improves the odds of being cited, never guarantees a placement.

Input Output Examples

Name	Type	Req	Description
business_name	string	—	The business name, e.g. "Joe's Plumbing". Provide this OR a website.
location	string	—	City or region, e.g. "Seattle, WA". Optional but improves accuracy.
website	string	—	The business website URL, e.g. https://joesplumbing.com. Optional if business_name is given; improves accuracy.

Name	Type	Req	Description
aiVisibilityScore	number\|null	—	0-100: the share of customer-style AI queries that named the business. Null when the probe didn't produce a measured score.
business	string\|null	—	The business name or website that was checked.
competitorsNamed	array	—	Businesses surfaced instead of this one (deduped). Same list the public shareable report shows.
competitorsSource	string\|null	—	'ai' = an AI engine named them; 'places' = real local leaders from Google's local results (shown when the engines named none). Null when no competitors surfaced.
enginesChecked	array	—	The AI engine panel the probes consult — an indicative read of how AI assistants tend to answer, not a live probe of every public engine.
note	string	yes	Honesty framing: results improve odds and show what AI says today — never a guarantee of placement.
ok	boolean	yes	False when the check could not be completed (bad input, rate limit, or the audit engine timed out).
queriesChecked	array	—	The customer-style questions asked to the AI engines (empty when the probe didn't run).
reportUrl	string	yes	Free, shareable, public report URL for this check.
seoGrade	string\|null	—	Letter grade (A-D) for the readiness score, when measured.
seoScore	number\|null	—	0-100 on-page AI-visibility readiness score, when measured.
topFixes	array	—	The top fixes to improve the odds of being named (max 3 here; full list in the report).
verdict	string	yes	Whether AI engines named this business when asked customer-style recommendation questions. 'named' = at least one query named it; 'absent' = confidently not named; 'unknown' = the engines could not g…

No examples provided.

how_to_appear_in_ai_search ~61

Get Radveo's honest, practical playbook for getting a local business found and cited inside AI engine answers (ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) — answer-engine optimization (AEO) steps any owner can act on.

Input Output Examples

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Name	Type	Req	Description
freeCheckUrl	string	yes	Where to run the free AI-visibility check.
note	string	yes	Honesty framing: these steps improve odds, they never guarantee placement.
ok	boolean	yes	—
steps	array	yes	The AEO steps, in order. Empty only when the server is rate-limiting.

No examples provided.

On this page

Handy links

Scoring key

80+ high trust
60–79 medium
below 60 low

How we score

Score history · last 30 days

26 Jul 3 Aug

Day	Score
26 Jul	65
27 Jul	65
28 Jul	66
29 Jul	67
30 Jul	65
31 Jul	66
1 Aug	66
2 Aug	67
3 Aug	67