OptiLibra Optical Networking
REMOTE · OPTILIBRA.COM
Search 400G/800G DCI, DWDM and optical switching gear for AI data centers and request quotes.
Available components
Last scanned (22 hours ago)
Scores higher than 54% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Cloud Infrastructure
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS check failed: the endpoint is reachable over plaintext HTTP. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 610 tokens (~203/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management37
- Stability observed for 11 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 24 Oct 26 64
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://optilibra.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=optilibra.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 22 Oct 2026 | 20 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 256bb288726d7b90e3a39600165eead |
| SANs: optilibra.com, *.optilibra.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of optilibra.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| optilibra.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://optilibra.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://optilibra.com/mcp | Served over HTTP | 200 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_product Get product specifications ~72
Get the documented specifications, images and source of one product by slug or model (from search_products). Figures not documented are not invented; reach, OSNR, prices and lead times are confirmed per quote.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| product | string | yes | Product slug or model, e.g. dci5800-t8e2 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
request_quote Request a quote ~282
Submit a request for quotation (RFQ) to OptiLibra on behalf of a buyer. Only call this when the buyer has asked for a quote and provided their real name, work email, company and country. Returns a tracking ID; an engineer replies to the work email within 24 hours.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agentName | string | – | Name of the AI agent or application submitting on the buyer's behalf |
| company | string | yes | Buyer's company |
| country | string | yes | Buyer's country |
| destinationCountry | string | – | Delivery country |
| fullName | string | yes | Buyer's full name |
| networkDistance | string | – | Approximate fiber distance, e.g. 80 km |
| products | array | – | Product slugs or models from search_products, e.g. dci5800-t8e2 |
| projectDescription | string | yes | What the buyer needs: application, sites, distances, capacity, timeline |
| projectTimeline | string | – | When the equipment is needed |
| quantity | string | – | Quantity or range |
| requiredCapacity | string | – | Target capacity, e.g. 4 × 800G |
| technicalRequirements | string | – | Interfaces, wavelengths, port counts, protection, power or other constraints |
| workEmail | string | yes | Buyer's work email; the quote is sent here |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_products Search optical networking products ~158
Search OptiLibra's catalog of optical networking equipment for AI and data center networks: 400G/800G DCI/DWDM transport (DCI5800, DCI5800-T8E2 800G transponder), optical switches and OXC matrices up to 64×64, EDFA amplifiers, OLP protection, OTDR/OCM monitoring, WSS and passive DWDM components. Returns product names, summaries and URLs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Optional category filter, e.g. 'Data center interconnect', 'Optical switching' |
| query | string | – | Free text, e.g. '800G DCI', 'optical switch 32x32', 'line protection' |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the OptiLibra Optical Networking MCP server?
OptiLibra Optical Networking is a hosted endpoint at https://optilibra.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · optilibra.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-optilibra-catalog 'https://optilibra.com/mcp'
What is the OptiLibra Optical Networking MCP server?
OptiLibra Optical Networking is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.optilibra/catalog. Search 400G/800G DCI, DWDM and optical switching gear for AI data centers and request quotes. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://optilibra.com/mcp).
Is the OptiLibra Optical Networking MCP server safe to use?
OptiLibra Optical Networking scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the OptiLibra Optical Networking MCP server expose?
OptiLibra Optical Networking exposes 3 tools: search_products, get_product, request_quote. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 512 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the OptiLibra Optical Networking MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to OptiLibra Optical Networking without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the OptiLibra Optical Networking MCP server still maintained?
OptiLibra Optical Networking is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.