GPU Rental Prices (Tanod)
REMOTE · TANOD.DEV
Compare GPU rental prices per hour on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and Akash, by chip, with free GPUs.
Available components
Last scanned (21 hours ago)
Scores higher than 54% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Cloud Infrastructure
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security83
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability41
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 915 tokens (~915/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management3
- Stability observed for 1 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 3 Nov 26 69
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://tanod.dev/mcp/gpu-prices
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=tanod.dev | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 6 Oct 2026 | 4 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6851725ddb26a21f8940bb1e8043a72f07f |
| SANs: *.tanod.dev, tanod.dev | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of tanod.dev. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| tanod.dev. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| tanod.dev. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://tanod.dev/mcp/gpu-prices | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://tanod.dev/mcp/gpu-prices | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://tanod.dev/mcp/gpu-prices |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_gpu_prices utilpeek: cheapest GPU per hour on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and Akash, on-demand, spot and marketplace bids, by chip, memory and region ~497
utilpeek: GPU prices: cheapest H100, A100, L4 per GPU-hour on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Akash. Returns cheapest GPU prices per GPU-hour on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud (list prices) and Akash (marketplace bids with GPUs free), by chip, memory, minimum GPUs per cloud machine, region and price ceiling; returns USD per machine-hour or null for unknown shape and an unknown-shape exclusion count; optionally rent-or-buy break-even. Input: all optional: `chip`, `min_gpu_mem_gb`, `min_gpus_per_machine`, `provider`, `regions`, `pricing`, `max_usd_per_gpu_hour`, `limit`, `rent_vs_buy`. List prices from a snapshot refreshed twice a day, excluding tax, egress and storage; spot changes often. A snapshot over 36 hours old is a 503 (not charged). Typically under 0.1 s. Price: USD 0.002. Free: 10 utilpeek calls per IP per UTC day. Docs: https://tanod.dev/learn/cloud-gpu-price-api.html
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| chip | – | – | GPU chip, any case, e.g. H100 or A100 80GB. |
| limit | integer | – | Rows to return, 1-100. |
| max_usd_per_gpu_hour | – | – | Ceiling on the ranked price, USD. |
| min_gpu_mem_gb | – | – | Minimum GPU memory in GB. |
| min_gpus_per_machine | – | – | Minimum GPUs in one cloud machine (1-16). Excludes rows without a known machine shape, including Akash marketplace inventory; count_excluded_unknown_machine_shape reports otherwise-matching rows excl… |
| pricing | string | – | Price to rank by; any is the lower of the two and also includes Akash marketplace rows (ranked by median bid); on_demand and spot are cloud list prices only. |
| provider | – | – | AWS, Azure, Google Cloud or Akash (marketplace bids, with GPUs free). |
| regions | – | – | Region names, e.g. us-east-1. |
| rent_vs_buy | – | – | Rent-or-buy break-even against the cheapest matching row: monthly cloud cost, monthly ownership cost, break-even month and totals. When min_gpus_per_machine is set and rent_vs_buy.gpus is omitted, co… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| count_excluded_unknown_machine_shape | integer|null | – | Otherwise-matching priced rows excluded because min_gpus_per_machine is set and their machine shape is unknown (including Akash inventory). Before limit; zero without the filter. Only rows available… |
| count_matched | integer|null | – | – |
| count_returned | integer|null | – | – |
| error | – | – | Only on an error result: an object {code, message}, or the reason string of an x402 PaymentRequired object. |
| generated_at | string|null | – | – |
| note | string|null | – | – |
| pricing | string|null | – | – |
| rent_vs_buy | object|null | – | Only with the rent_vs_buy input: break-even against the cheapest matching row; null when no row matches (see rent_vs_buy_unavailable). |
| rent_vs_buy_unavailable | string|null | – | – |
| rows | array|null | – | – |
| sources | object|null | – | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) MCP server?
GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) is a hosted endpoint at https://tanod.dev/mcp/gpu-prices, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · tanod.dev
claude mcp add --transport http dev-tanod-gpu-prices 'https://tanod.dev/mcp/gpu-prices'
What is the GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) MCP server?
GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.tanod/gpu-prices. Compare GPU rental prices per hour on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and Akash, by chip, with free GPUs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://tanod.dev/mcp/gpu-prices).
Is the GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) MCP server safe to use?
GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) MCP server expose?
GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) exposes 1 tool: get_gpu_prices. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 497 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) MCP server still maintained?
GPU Rental Prices (Tanod) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.