Metruvo portfolio analysis
REMOTE · METRUVO.COM
Portfolio analysis from published fund data: charges, exposure and overlap. Read-only.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 60% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 544 tokens (~136/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
- Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage80
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 40% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 26 Oct 26 68
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://metruvo.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=metruvo.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 14 Sept 2026 | 13 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 533446698df0be2b7152131190a512eaecb |
| SANs: metruvo.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of metruvo.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| metruvo.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://metruvo.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://metruvo.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://metruvo.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_funds ~164
Analyze two ETFs as a 50/50 portfolio, with overlap and issuer facts including dated ongoing charges side by side, and each fund's own region and sector exposure. Identify each side with exactly one ISIN or ticker; a ticker can be ambiguous across exchanges. Unknown facts remain null. Returns checkUrl: a shareable link to the same result.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| isinA | string | – | ISIN with a valid check digit. |
| isinB | string | – | ISIN with a valid check digit. |
| tickerA | string | – | Exchange ticker, e.g. VWCE or SWDA.L; may match listings on several exchanges. |
| tickerB | string | – | Exchange ticker, e.g. VWCE or SWDA.L; may match listings on several exchanges. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rank_funds ~104
Sort 2 to 10 funds by up to three published facts: ongoing charge, US share, pairwise overlap and holdings count. Rows follow the criteria in order. A missing fact sorts last and stays null; it is never estimated. Rates are decimal fractions (0.07 = 7%). Analysis based on published fund data. Returns checkUrl: a shareable link to the same result.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| criteria | array | yes | – |
| isins | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_funds ~55
Search the published instrument catalogue by name, ISIN or ticker; includes currency and listing identifiers. Returns checkUrl: a shareable link to the same result.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
xray_portfolio ~124
Analyze free-preview ETF overlap/concentration findings, known ongoing charges and regional/sector exposures from published evidence. Identify each holding with exactly one ISIN or ticker; a ticker can be ambiguous across exchanges. Use positive relative weights, values in one base currency, or omit all amounts for equal weights. Never mix weights and values. At most 10 distinct tickers per call. Dates, coverage and all data gaps accompany the result. Returns checkUrl: a shareable link to the same result.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseCurrency | string | – | – |
| holdings | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Metruvo portfolio analysis MCP server?
Metruvo portfolio analysis is a hosted endpoint at https://metruvo.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · metruvo.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-metruvo-fund-comparison 'https://metruvo.com/api/mcp'
What is the Metruvo portfolio analysis MCP server?
Metruvo portfolio analysis is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.metruvo/fund-comparison. Portfolio analysis from published fund data: charges, exposure and overlap. Read-only. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://metruvo.com/api/mcp).
Is the Metruvo portfolio analysis MCP server safe to use?
Metruvo portfolio analysis scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Metruvo portfolio analysis MCP server expose?
Metruvo portfolio analysis exposes 4 tools: search_funds, xray_portfolio, compare_funds, rank_funds. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 447 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Metruvo portfolio analysis MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Metruvo portfolio analysis without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Metruvo portfolio analysis MCP server still maintained?
Metruvo portfolio analysis is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.