Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO

REMOTE · PRO-LO.ONRENDER.COM

Coherence-gated signal engine. Paid verdict settled end-to-end 2026-11-01 (SELF-PROOF, XRPL).

+3 this week 73 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 60% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability70
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1352 tokens (~112/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
  • Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "execute_gemini_frontier_reasoning" implies "execute" and declares readOnlyHint instead, contradicting what its own name says it does. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +8
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “classify_microstructure_regime” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “coherence_jev_verdict” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “track_gamma_squeeze_mechanics” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • New tool “earnings_gate_verdict” functional
  • 27 Oct 26 62

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://pro-lo.onrender.com/api/mcp/rpc

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=onrender.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 21 Sept 2026 20 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 6eb1e3fe7d0631ea1337bfa4a321c137
SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of pro-lo.onrender.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
onrender.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://pro-lo.onrender.com/api/mcp/rpc Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://pro-lo.onrender.com/api/mcp/rpc HTTPS enforced 301 https://pro-lo.onrender.com/api/mcp/rpc
MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~1,352 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
analyze_narrative_divergence ~111

Compares real fundamental signals (P/E, real reference data) against a disclosed, real-price-derived momentum/volatility proxy for narrative intensity. Real fundamental/social sentiment data is not currently wired — narrative-side scoring is disclosed as a proxy, not literal sentiment measurement.

NameTypeReqDescription
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol (e.g. NVDA, TSLA, AAPL, MSFT)
timeHorizonDaysnumber–Lookback window in days (default: 90)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

classify_microstructure_regime ~65

Real dealer gamma exposure (GEX) computed from a real fetched options chain (Tradier/Polygon), and Reg SHO threshold-list status from the SEC fails-to-deliver record via the SqueezeOS FTD oracle.

NameTypeReqDescription
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

coherence_gate_review ~116

PRO-LO Coherence Gate: multi-path consensus for one ticker across PRO-LO's independent real directional signals (trade-engine composite, daily SMA20/50 trend, SqueezeOS graded picks, SML Triple-Trigger). Returns each path with direction (long/short/flat) and confidence, the coherence score, and pass/block gate. Same formula as the SML mcp-x402 Coherent Gate. Jev (TypeSafe) review is not run over MCP.

NameTypeReqDescription
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

coherence_jev_verdict ~224

Paid (x402, 0.25 RLUSD) read-only decision product: computes PRO-LO multi-path coherence for a ticker — coherence = |Σ w·d| / Σ w across the signal paths (paths that cannot answer abstain and never vote) — and adds a Jev (TypeSafe AI) review. Verdict is PASS when consensus is non-flat, coherence >= 0.6, at least 2 paths agree, and the agreeing paths span at least 2 distinct data families (the trade composite and daily trend share the price series = one family); otherwise DENY, with a family-blocked DENY naming that reason. Jev review reports status unavailable when TYPESAFE_API_KEY is not configured — never simulated.

NameTypeReqDescription
actionstring–Optional proposed action this verdict is about (context, echoed back in the result)
claimstring–Optional claim or context being evaluated (echoed back in the result)
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol (e.g. NVDA, AMC, GME)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

earnings_gate_verdict ~258

Paid (x402, 0.25 RLUSD) pre-earnings coherence gate: four paths across three data families — SEC EDGAR insider Form 4 open-market direction, SEC fails-to-deliver pressure (SqueezeOS FTD oracle), front-expiration options flow imbalance, and dealer gamma-exposure structure (flow and structure are measured from one chain snapshot = one family) — vote into the fleet coherence formula coherence = |Σ w·d| / Σ w. Verdict is PASS when consensus is non-flat, coherence >= 0.6, at least 2 paths agree, and the agreeing paths span at least 2 distinct data families; otherwise DENY. Paths that cannot answer abstain and are named in the output — they never vote. Includes a Jev (TypeSafe AI) review (status unavailable when not configured — never simulated). SHADOW posture: decision_eligible is false; the gate executes nothing.

NameTypeReqDescription
earnings_datestring–Optional earnings print date (YYYY-MM-DD) to anchor the gate; when omitted, the next real print is read from the Finnhub earnings calendar
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol (e.g. NVDA, AAPL, TSLA)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

execute_gemini_frontier_reasoning ~67

Invokes Google Gemini with real, live-fetched market data as grounding context — no invented inputs are passed to the model.

NameTypeReqDescription
focusQuestionstring–Specific analytical thesis or strategic question to investigate
tickerstringyesTarget ticker or asset name

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

generate_trade_execution_signals ~118

Generates a disclosed-heuristic BUY/SELL/HOLD verdict and selects real, currently-listed option contracts (real strike, real expiration, real bid/ask/greeks) nearest a target delta band from a real fetched chain — never an invented contract.

NameTypeReqDescription
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol (e.g., NVDA, AAPL, TSLA, MSFT)
timeHorizonstring–Target trading horizon (e.g., "14_days", "30_days", "45_days", "90_days")

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

live_universe_scanner_scan ~83

Real wide-market scan (Polygon grouped-daily aggregates across the real US equity universe, not a fixed short symbol list, no pinned symbols) fused with the real per-symbol GEX/Hurst/IV-surface engines above.

NameTypeReqDescription
filterRegimestring–Filter criteria: ALL, SQUEEZE, FRACTAL, SKEW

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

mandelbrot_fractal_analysis ~113

Real Rescaled-Range Hurst exponent computed from real historical bars at each real timeframe (15M/1H/4H/1D/1W). Reports real excess kurtosis of the real return series. Does not compute a true Hölder singularity spectrum (requires tick-level history this build does not ingest) — abstains rather than fabricating one.

NameTypeReqDescription
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol (e.g. NVDA, TSLA, AMC, GME, SPY)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

simulate_counterfactual_stress_test ~78

Runs a disclosed hypothetical shock scenario (from a static, pre-defined scenario catalog) against a real live quote. The projected impact is an explicit heuristic model applied to a real spot price, not a claimed prediction.

NameTypeReqDescription
scenarioIdstringyesPre-configured scenario ID
tickerstringyesTarget ticker symbol

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

track_gamma_squeeze_mechanics ~61

Real squeeze-pressure score from real chain-derived GEX and SEC fails-to-deliver pressure via the SqueezeOS FTD oracle — a disclosed proxy for short-selling pressure, not true short interest.

NameTypeReqDescription
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

track_volatility_surface ~58

Real implied-volatility surface grid built directly from a real fetched options chain across several real expirations — every grid point is a real listed contract, not an interpolated/fabricated one.

NameTypeReqDescription
tickerstringyesStock ticker symbol

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO MCP server?

SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO is a hosted endpoint at https://pro-lo.onrender.com/api/mcp/rpc, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · pro-lo.onrender.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-scriptmasterlabs-pro-lo 'https://pro-lo.onrender.com/api/mcp/rpc'
Common questions

What is the SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO MCP server?

SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.scriptmasterlabs/pro-lo. Coherence-gated signal engine. Paid verdict settled end-to-end 2026-11-01 (SELF-PROOF, XRPL). This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://pro-lo.onrender.com/api/mcp/rpc).

Is the SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO MCP server safe to use?

SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO MCP server expose?

SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO exposes 12 tools: analyze_narrative_divergence, simulate_counterfactual_stress_test, classify_microstructure_regime, execute_gemini_frontier_reasoning, generate_trade_execution_signals, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,352 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO MCP server still maintained?

SCRIPTMASTERLABS — PRO-LO is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.