Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ELD Hub

REMOTE · GOELDHUB.COM

FMCSA-registered ELD for small fleets: pricing, ELD comparisons, Highway check and signup.

Available components

+3 this week 80 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 81% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Cloud Infrastructure

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1621 tokens (~108/item across 15 items; 15 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
  • Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 15 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 16 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 22 Oct 26 74

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://goeldhub.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=goeldhub.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 2 Nov 2026 1 Feb 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 14ff781786b99e2513f78ef228ca34f2
SANs: goeldhub.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of goeldhub.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
goeldhub.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://goeldhub.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://goeldhub.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://goeldhub.com/mcp
MCP tools · 15 exposed · ~1,317 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_broker_integration ~98

Answer whether an ELD HUB account satisfies a broker or carrier-vetting platform that requires a connected ELD — Highway, Trucker Tools, and broker-side vetting generally — and return the exact setup steps, pricing and hardware availability.

NameTypeReqDescription
platformstring|nullyesPlatform or broker name, e.g. 'Highway', 'Trucker Tools', 'RMIS', or a broker's name. Null for a general answer.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_eld_requirement ~177

Determine whether a vehicle needs an FMCSA electronic logging device: takes vehicle type, gross weight, operating radius, interstate status and CDL status, and returns whether the ELD mandate applies, which exemption fits, and why a broker may still require a connected ELD anyway.

NameTypeReqDescription
airMileRadiusnumber|nullyesTypical operating radius from the home terminal in air miles. Null if unknown.
grossWeightLbsnumber|nullyesGross vehicle weight rating, or combined rating when towing, in pounds. Null if unknown.
interstateboolean|nullyesTrue if the vehicle crosses state lines or hauls interstate commerce. Null if unknown.
vehiclestringyesVehicle type, e.g. 'sprinter van', 'cargo van', 'box truck', 'pickup truck / hotshot', 'semi truck'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_hardware_compatibility ~119

Check whether an existing ELD device (PT-30, IOSiX ELD-BT/ELD-DX, or another provider's gateway) can be re-registered to ELD Hub, or buy a new PT-30 or IOSiX for $150 each with free shipping (IOSiX device only, PT-30 with cable).

NameTypeReqDescription
devicestringyesDevice or provider name, e.g. 'PT-30', 'IOSiX ELD-BT', 'Samsara VG34'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

compare_eld_providers ~109

Compare FMCSA-registered ELD providers on monthly price per truck, contract length, hardware cost, three-year total cost of ownership and hidden fees. Optionally filter to a specific provider and size the cost to a fleet.

NameTypeReqDescription
providerstring|nullyesOptional provider name to focus on, e.g. 'Motive' or 'Samsara'. Null returns all providers.
trucks–yesOptional fleet size used to compute annual software cost per provider. Null omits it.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

estimate_switch_savings ~87

Estimate what a carrier saves per year by moving from their current ELD provider to ELD Hub at $15/truck/month, including a link to the provider's cancellation guide.

NameTypeReqDescription
currentProviderstring|nullyesCurrent ELD provider name, e.g. 'Motive'. Null uses a mid-tier average.
trucksintegeryesNumber of trucks in the fleet.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_loads_for_vehicle ~101

Return where freight comes from for a given vehicle type (box truck, cargo or sprinter van, hotshot pickup, dry van): load boards, Amazon Relay, final-mile and direct broker sources, plus the carrier-vetting requirements a carrier must clear before a broker releases a load.

NameTypeReqDescription
vehiclestringyesVehicle type, e.g. 'box truck', 'cargo van', 'sprinter van', 'hotshot', 'dry van'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_blog_post ~65

Fetch a single published ELD Hub blog post by slug. Returns full body (markdown or HTML), title, excerpt, cover image, category, and publish date.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyesPost slug, e.g. 'pt-30-eld-how-it-works'.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_contact_info ~31

Return ELD Hub contact details: phone, email, working hours, book-a-call link, and website.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_eld_pricing ~57

Return ELD Hub's verified pricing: $15/truck/month software with no contract, PT-30 and IOSiX hardware at $150 each with free shipping, package contents, three-year total cost and sign-up URL.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_hos_rules ~103

Return the current FMCSA hours-of-service limits for property-carrying or passenger-carrying CMV drivers: the 11-hour driving limit, 14-hour on-duty window, 30-minute break, 60/70-hour weekly cap, 34-hour restart, sleeper-berth split and the 150 air-mile short-haul exception.

NameTypeReqDescription
driverType–yesType of CMV driver. Null defaults to property-carrying (freight).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_blog_posts ~87

List published ELD Hub blog posts (trucking, ELD, factoring, fuel cards, insurance, compliance). Returns slug, title, excerpt, category, cover image, and publish date.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional category filter (e.g. 'compliance', 'factoring', 'fuel').
limitinteger–Max posts to return (default 20).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_services ~38

Return the list of ELD Hub services (ELD compliance, fuel cards, factoring, working capital, freight) with descriptions and sign-up URLs.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

recommend_eld ~79

Give a short ELD recommendation and cost for a trucking fleet, using ELD Hub's verified offer, Highway integration and hardware reuse.

NameTypeReqDescription
needsHighwayboolean–Whether the carrier needs Highway integration.
ownsHardwarestring–ELD hardware the carrier already owns.
trucksintegeryesNumber of trucks in the fleet.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

start_signup ~42

Get the tracked ELD Hub signup link, the 4 signup steps and the hand-over rules so an assistant can help a carrier register (customer enters their own card).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

start_trucking_business ~124

Return the full launch sequence for starting a trucking business with a given vehicle type (box truck, cargo or sprinter van, hotshot pickup, semi): licensing and CDL reality, USDOT/MC/BOC-3/UCR/IFTA filings, typical year-one cost ranges, where the loads come from, and the ELD brokers ask for.

NameTypeReqDescription
vehiclestring|nullyesVehicle type: 'box truck', 'cargo van', 'sprinter van', 'hotshot pickup', or 'semi truck'. Null returns the general new-authority path.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the ELD Hub MCP server?

ELD Hub is a hosted endpoint at https://goeldhub.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · goeldhub.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-goeldhub-eldhub 'https://goeldhub.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the ELD Hub MCP server?

ELD Hub is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.goeldhub/eldhub. FMCSA-registered ELD for small fleets: pricing, ELD comparisons, Highway check and signup. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://goeldhub.com/mcp).

Is the ELD Hub MCP server safe to use?

ELD Hub scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ELD Hub MCP server expose?

ELD Hub exposes 15 tools: recommend_eld, start_signup, check_eld_requirement, get_hos_rules, check_broker_integration, and 10 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,317 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the ELD Hub MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to ELD Hub without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the ELD Hub MCP server still maintained?

ELD Hub is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the ELD Hub MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on ELD Hub, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.