com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck
REMOTE · WWW.EDGETHIRTEEN.COM · SCANNED SEP 20
Scan a public GitHub repo for known Vercel Python-runtime deploy footguns.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 226 tokens (~226/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability check failed: schema churn in the 6 days we've observed: 0 tool removals, 1 breaking changes, 0 auth/transport breaks, 0 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 1 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck MCP server?
com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck is a hosted endpoint at https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.edgethirteen.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck 'https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck": {
"url": "https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck] url = "https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck --url 'https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck:
url: "https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck" {
"McpServers": {
"com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck"
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck -t streamable-http -u 'https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck'
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-edgethirteen-www-vercelpycheck": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 18 Sept 26 +2
- MCP protocol: fail → pass ▲ functional
- MCP protocol version: 2025-03-26 → 2025-11-25 functional
- 17 Sept 26 +7
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Tool “check_vercel_python_project” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 15 Sept 26 −1
- Stability: unverified → fail ▼ security
- A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 1.0.0 ▼ security
- Tool “check_vercel_python_project” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
- “check_vercel_python_project” added a required parameter “files”, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “check_vercel_python_project” dropped the required parameter “repo” ▼ functional
- 14 Sept 26 66
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.edgethirteen.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 24 Aug 2026 | 22 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 6839f6f39d66a38fe8deece9986a25a4546 |
| SANs: www.edgethirteen.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.edgethirteen.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| edgethirteen.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_vercel_python_project ~226
Scan pasted project files for known Vercel Python-runtime deploy footguns: conflicting requirements.txt/pyproject.toml manifests, a dependency manifest missing from the project root, sibling-module imports that need sys.path, multiple top-level ASGI apps under api/, streaming/SSE responses that can crash the Python runtime, oversized dependencies (torch/tensorflow/etc.), and unrouted .well-known/ files. Static analysis over file contents -- it doesn't run a real build, so a clean result means 'no known footgun found,' not a deploy guarantee. To scan a public GitHub repo automatically instead of pasting files, use the $29 checkout at https://www.edgethirteen.com/tools/vercelpycheck.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| files | string | yes | Project files bundled as repeated '### FILE: path' markers followed by that file's content, e.g. '### FILE: requirements.txt\nfastapi\n### FILE: api/index.py\n...'. Include api/*.py files plus root m… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck MCP server?
com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck. Scan a public GitHub repo for known Vercel Python-runtime deploy footguns. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.edgethirteen.com/api/mcp/vercelpycheck).
Is the com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck MCP server safe to use?
com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck MCP server expose?
com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck exposes 1 tool: check_vercel_python_project. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 226 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck MCP server still maintained?
com.edgethirteen.www/vercelpycheck is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.