Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ConnectorReport

REMOTE · CONNECTORREPORT.COM

Hands-on test results for 560+ remote MCP connectors: does it work, how to sign in, what breaks.

+56 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 84% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 284 tokens (~56/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
  • Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage87
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 60% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +55
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.57 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 28 Oct 26 −52
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.37 → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://connectorreport.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.connectorreport.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 16 Oct 2026 14 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 6be224f203d899ea4e0fc3b0ae7e4916b32
SANs: *.connectorreport.com, connectorreport.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of connectorreport.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
connectorreport.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://connectorreport.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://connectorreport.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://connectorreport.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~284 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_connector_status ~57

Current Connector Weather (Clear, Cloudy or Stormy) for a connector by name, plus the last test date. Check this before relying on a connector.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesConnector name or slug, for example "Slack"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

compare_connectors ~33

Side-by-side hands-on results for 2 to 10 connector slugs.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugsarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_connector_report ~68

Full hands-on test report for one connector by slug: status, pass rate, tested date, each task, gotchas, fix recipes and page URL.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyesConnector slug, for example "notion" or "github". Use list_connectors to find slugs.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_connectors ~86

List every MCP connector ConnectorReport has tested hands-on, with status, pass rate and last test date. Optional category: ai-ml, cloud, developer-tools, docs, other, productivity, public-data, search, travel.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–One of: ai-ml, cloud, developer-tools, docs, other, productivity, public-data, search, travel

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_reports ~40

Full-text search across tested connectors, task details, run notes and gotchas, for example "OAuth" or "token".

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the ConnectorReport MCP server?

ConnectorReport is a hosted endpoint at https://connectorreport.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · connectorreport.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-connectorreport-connectorreport 'https://connectorreport.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the ConnectorReport MCP server?

ConnectorReport is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.connectorreport/connectorreport. Hands-on test results for 560+ remote MCP connectors: does it work, how to sign in, what breaks. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://connectorreport.com/api/mcp).

Is the ConnectorReport MCP server safe to use?

ConnectorReport scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ConnectorReport MCP server expose?

ConnectorReport exposes 5 tools: list_connectors, get_connector_report, check_connector_status, compare_connectors, search_reports. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 284 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the ConnectorReport MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to ConnectorReport without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the ConnectorReport MCP server still maintained?

ConnectorReport is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.