SaaS Think Tank — Software Research
REMOTE · SAASTHINKTANK.COM
Published software research from SaaS Think Tank. Current MCP edition: app-builder findings.
Available components
Last scanned (23 hours ago)
Scores higher than 84% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Developer Tools
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability82
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 449 tokens (~112/item across 4 items; 3 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
- Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 0
- Server version: 1.0.1 → 1.0.2 functional
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://saasthinktank.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=saasthinktank.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 23 Oct 2026 | 21 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 9b8c4f6a3ea13abd1360dd15c59bf8cc |
| SANs: saasthinktank.com, *.saasthinktank.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of saasthinktank.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| saasthinktank.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://saasthinktank.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://saasthinktank.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://saasthinktank.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_products Compare published findings ~100
Compare 2–4 covered app builders on the released code, GitHub, backend and database questions. Specify capability IDs from coverage or search results, or omit them for all four questions. Preserves separate dates and unknowns; provides no overall ranking.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability_ids | array | – | Exact capability IDs from coverage or search results. Omit to compare all four covered questions. |
| products | array | yes | Two to four distinct covered product names or IDs. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| capabilities | array | – | – |
| coverage | object | yes | – |
| dataset | object | – | – |
| error | object | – | – |
| limitations | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| products | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_finding Get a published finding ~67
Retrieve one exact finding using a record ID returned by search_findings or compare_products. Returns the published answer, scope, original dates, conditions, limits, source links and dataset attribution.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| record_id | string | yes | Exact record_id from a prior result. Do not invent an ID. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| coverage | object | yes | – |
| dataset | object | – | – |
| error | object | – | – |
| finding | object | – | – |
| limitations | array | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search_findings Search published findings ~131
Find dated findings about code export, GitHub sync, backend connections and databases for Bubble, Lovable, Base44 and Replit. Use this to discover record IDs; get_finding retrieves one exact record. Other topics return no matches, not a product verdict.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Maximum findings to return, from 1 to 16. Default: 16. |
| products | array | – | Covered product names or IDs. Use the coverage resource to see available products. |
| query | string | yes | A product question or covered topic, such as “Can Bubble and Lovable export source code?” |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| coverage | object | yes | – |
| dataset | object | – | – |
| error | object | – | – |
| findings | array | – | – |
| limitations | array | – | – |
| matched_count | integer | – | – |
| no_matches | string | – | – |
| ok | boolean | yes | – |
| query | string | – | – |
| returned_count | integer | – | – |
| truncated | boolean | – | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the SaaS Think Tank — Software Research MCP server?
SaaS Think Tank — Software Research is a hosted endpoint at https://saasthinktank.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · saasthinktank.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-saasthinktank-evidence 'https://saasthinktank.com/mcp'
What is the SaaS Think Tank — Software Research MCP server?
SaaS Think Tank — Software Research is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.saasthinktank/evidence. Published software research from SaaS Think Tank. Current MCP edition: app-builder findings. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://saasthinktank.com/mcp).
Is the SaaS Think Tank — Software Research MCP server safe to use?
SaaS Think Tank — Software Research scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the SaaS Think Tank — Software Research MCP server expose?
SaaS Think Tank — Software Research exposes 3 tools: search_findings, get_finding, compare_products. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 298 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the SaaS Think Tank — Software Research MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to SaaS Think Tank — Software Research without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the SaaS Think Tank — Software Research MCP server still maintained?
SaaS Think Tank — Software Research is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.