Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Codemate website

REMOTE · CODEMATE.COM

Read-only tools for codemate.com: search, articles, case studies, company and contact facts, jobs.

Available components

+3 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (18 hours ago)

Scores higher than 85% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1029 tokens (~128/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
  • Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “get_topic” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 functional
  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://codemate.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=codemate.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 23 Oct 2026 21 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 332c8d7a8640da9a0eeaeec94728354c
SANs: codemate.com, *.codemate.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of codemate.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
codemate.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://consent.cookiebot.com https://consentcdn.cookiebot.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://sc.lfeeder.com https://connect.facebook.net https://snap.licdn.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://*.doubleclick.net https://www.google.com https://www.gstatic.com https://www.youtube.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://use.typekit.net https://p.typekit.net; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com https://use.typekit.net; img-src 'self' https://cdn.sanity.io https://codemate.com https://media.codemate.com https://imgsct.cookiebot.com https://i.ytimg.com https://tr.lfeeder.com https://www.facebook.com https://px.ads.linkedin.com https://dc.ads.linkedin.com https://www.linkedin.com https://*.doubleclick.net https://www.google.com https://www.google.fi https://www.googletagmanager.com data:; media-src 'self' https://media.codemate.com; frame-src https://media.codemate.com https://www.youtube.com https://www.
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy accelerometer=(), camera=(), geolocation=(), gyroscope=(), magnetometer=(), microphone=(), payment=(), usb=(), interest-cohort=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://codemate.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://codemate.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://codemate.com/mcp
MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~1,029 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_company_info ~102

Get authoritative facts about Codemate as a company: what it does, its legal entities, and whatever else it publishes about itself. Use this when asked to describe or introduce Codemate, rather than assembling an answer from service pages and articles. Only states facts Codemate has verified — if something is not returned, it is not published, so do not infer it.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Which language edition of the site to answer from. Defaults to English.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_contact_info ~145

Get how to reach Codemate: office addresses with map links, named people with their role, email, phone, LinkedIn and photo, plus the general sales email and phone numbers. Filter by role or office. Use this when asked how to contact Codemate, who to speak to about something, or where its offices are.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Which language edition of the site to answer from. Defaults to English.
officestring–Office filter, e.g. "Helsinki", "Oulu".
rolestring–Role filter, e.g. "sales", "CEO", "recruit". Matches part of the job title.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_page_data ~113

Read the full text of a codemate.com article or client case study, given the URL that search_site, list_articles or list_references returned. Returns the title, date, metadata and the page's prose. Use this after a search to actually read a result — search only returns a summary. For Codemate's main service and product pages, use get_topic instead.

NameTypeReqDescription
urlstringyesThe codemate.com URL (or path) of an article or case study, from a search or list result.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_topic ~124

Read the full text of one of Codemate's main pages. Valid ids: what-we-do, design, code, care, how-we-deliver, ai-transformation, solutions, paimen-ai, about, google-partnership. Returns the page summary, its sections and any FAQ. Use this to answer questions about Codemate's services, delivery model, AI transformation offering or the Paimen agentic UX platform.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesWhich page to read.
langstring–Which language edition of the site to answer from. Defaults to English.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_articles ~139

List Codemate's published articles, newest first, with date, category, summary and URL. Filter by category or by date. Use this when asked what Codemate has written or published about something, or for recent news — search_site only returns the closest few matches.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Category filter, matching the site's own article filter tabs.
langstring–Which language edition of the site to answer from. Defaults to English.
limitinteger–Maximum articles, 1-50.
sincestring–Only articles published on or after this date. A year ("2026") or an ISO date.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_open_positions ~88

List the jobs Codemate is currently hiring for, with location, the job page URL and the application link. Use this when asked whether Codemate is hiring, or about careers and open roles.

NameTypeReqDescription
langstring–Which language edition of the site to answer from. Defaults to English.
locationstring–Optional city or country filter, e.g. "Helsinki".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_references ~164

List Codemate's client case studies (called references on the site), with the client name, industries, services, a summary and the URL. Filter by industry, service or client. Use this when asked what Codemate has delivered, for whom, or for proof of experience in a sector — search_site only returns the closest few matches and mixes in articles.

NameTypeReqDescription
clientstring–Client name filter, e.g. "Restel".
industrystring–Industry filter, e.g. "Finance and insurance" or just "finance".
langstring–Which language edition of the site to answer from. Defaults to English.
servicestring–Service filter, e.g. "AI and data", "Software development", "Testing".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_site ~154

Search Codemate's website: service pages, client case studies and articles. Returns the best-matching titles with their URLs and a one-line summary. Use this to find out what Codemate does, which industries and technologies it has delivered in, or whether it has written about a topic.

NameTypeReqDescription
kindstring–Restrict to one kind: "reference" for client case studies, "article" for published articles, "page" for service and product pages. Omit to search all three.
langstring–Which language edition of the site to answer from. Defaults to English.
limitinteger–Maximum results, 1-10.
querystringyesWords to search for.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Codemate website MCP server?

Codemate website is a hosted endpoint at https://codemate.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · codemate.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-codemate-website 'https://codemate.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Codemate website MCP server?

Codemate website is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.codemate/website. Read-only tools for codemate.com: search, articles, case studies, company and contact facts, jobs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://codemate.com/mcp).

Is the Codemate website MCP server safe to use?

Codemate website scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Codemate website MCP server expose?

Codemate website exposes 8 tools: search_site, list_references, list_articles, get_topic, list_open_positions, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,029 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Codemate website MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Codemate website without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Codemate website MCP server still maintained?

Codemate website is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.