Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ATAbooking

REMOTE · ATABOOKING.COM

Book hotels direct through your AI, for a 5% fee. Demo: sample hotels, no real bookings yet.

Available components

72 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 844 tokens (~168/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
  • Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage83
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 48% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • Tool “search_stays” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • “search_stays” added an optional parameter “cursor” cosmetic
  • 1 Nov 26 70

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://atabooking.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=atabooking.com CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 1 Nov 2026 30 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 61c5ae31349175ac8977c8f0ec439029783
SANs: atabooking.com
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of atabooking.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
atabooking.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(self), microphone=(self), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://atabooking.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://atabooking.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://atabooking.com/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~720 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
book_direct ~253

Places a 15-minute HOLD on the room and emails the guest a 6-digit code. Nothing is booked and nothing reaches the hotel until the guest confirms. After calling, tell the guest: check your email (the result shows the masked address), then either read the code back to you (call confirm_booking) or click Confirm in the email. Send an idempotency_key and reuse it if you retry. Confirm name, email, dates and price with the guest before calling. Demo hotels (demo: true) confirm at once and send no email.

NameTypeReqDescription
agentstring–Name of the AI agent/app placing the request
check_instringyes–
check_out–yes–
guest_emailstringyes–
guest_namestringyes–
guest_phonestring––
guestsintegeryes–
idempotency_keystring–One per booking attempt (8-128 of A-Z a-z 0-9 _ -). Reuse it on retries to get the same hold back.
notesstring–Requests for the hotel, e.g. late arrival
room_id–yes–
stay_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_availability ~74

Re-check one room for exact dates and guests right before booking. Returns available yes/no and the live quote. Demo hotels are marked demo: true.

NameTypeReqDescription
check_instringyes–
check_out–yes–
guestsintegeryes–
room_id–yes–
stay_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

confirm_booking ~78

Confirm a held booking with the 6-digit code the guest received by email. Only use a code the guest gave you. Five wrong codes cancel the hold. Confirming twice returns the same booking.

NameTypeReqDescription
codestringyesThe 6-digit code from the guest's email
hold_idstringyeshold_id from book_direct

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_stay ~83

Rooms, prices, what's included, check-in/out times and cancellation terms for one stay. Demo hotels are marked demo: true.

NameTypeReqDescription
check_instring–Optional: with check_out, adds availability and a quote per room
check_out–––
guestsinteger––
stay_idstringyesstay_id from search_stays

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_stays ~232

Find hotels with a room free for the dates and guests. Returns each stay's cheapest fitting room with a quote (price, ATA fee 5%, typical 15-20% OTA cut). Demo hotels are marked demo: true. Results come in pages: when more_results is true, call search_stays again with the same arguments plus cursor: next_cursor to get the rest. Nothing is left out.

NameTypeReqDescription
check_instringyesArrival date, YYYY-MM-DD
check_outstringyesDeparture date, YYYY-MM-DD
cursorstring–next_cursor from the previous page of this same search, to get the next page
guestsintegeryesNumber of guests in one room
max_price_per_nightnumber–Budget per night in the hotel's currency (EUR in the demo)
placestringyesCity, area, country or hotel name, e.g. 'Bangkok' or 'Gamla Stan'
wantsarray–Nice-to-haves, e.g. ['pool','beach','quiet']; ranks matches first

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the ATAbooking MCP server?

ATAbooking is a hosted endpoint at https://atabooking.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · atabooking.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-atabooking-mcp 'https://atabooking.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the ATAbooking MCP server?

ATAbooking is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.atabooking/mcp. Book hotels direct through your AI, for a 5% fee. Demo: sample hotels, no real bookings yet. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://atabooking.com/mcp).

Is the ATAbooking MCP server safe to use?

ATAbooking scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ATAbooking MCP server expose?

ATAbooking exposes 5 tools: search_stays, get_stay, check_availability, book_direct, confirm_booking. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 720 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the ATAbooking MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to ATAbooking without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the ATAbooking MCP server still maintained?

ATAbooking is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.